Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden.
Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Sweden.
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021 Apr 23;28(3):250-259. doi: 10.1177/2047487320909300. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
It is not clear if the European Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation algorithm is useful for identifying prevalent subclinical atherosclerosis in a population of apparently healthy individuals. Our aim was to explore the association between the risk estimates from Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation and prevalent subclinical atherosclerosis.
The design of this study was as a cross-sectional analysis from a population-based study cohort.
From the general population, the Swedish Cardiopulmonary Bioimage Study randomly invited individuals aged 50-64 years and enrolled 13,411 participants mean age 57 (standard deviation 4.3) years; 46% males between November 2013-December 2016. Associations between Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation risk estimates and coronary artery calcification and plaques in the carotid arteries by using imaging data from a computed tomography of the heart and ultrasonography of the carotid arteries were examined.
Coronary calcification was present in 39.5% and carotid plaque in 56.0%. In men, coronary artery calcium score >0 ranged from 40.7-65.9% and presence of carotid plaques from 54.5% to 72.8% in the age group 50-54 and 60-65 years, respectively. In women, the corresponding difference was from 17.1-38.9% and from 41.0-58.4%. A doubling of Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation was associated with an increased probability to have coronary artery calcium score >0 (odds ratio: 2.18 (95% confidence interval 2.07-2.30)) and to have >1 carotid plaques (1.67 (1.61-1.74)).
Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation estimated risk is associated with prevalent subclinical atherosclerosis in two major vascular beds in a general population sample without established cardiovascular disease or diabetes mellitus. Thus, the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation risk chart may be of use for estimating the risk of subclinical atherosclerosis.
目前尚不清楚欧洲系统性冠状动脉风险评估算法是否可用于识别一般健康人群中普遍存在的亚临床动脉粥样硬化。我们的目的是探讨系统性冠状动脉风险评估的风险估计与普遍存在的亚临床动脉粥样硬化之间的关系。
本研究的设计是一项基于人群的研究队列的横断面分析。
从一般人群中,瑞典心肺生物影像学研究随机邀请年龄在 50-64 岁的个体,并于 2013 年 11 月至 2016 年 12 月期间招募了 13411 名参与者,平均年龄为 57(标准差 4.3)岁;男性占 46%。使用心脏计算机断层扫描和颈动脉超声的影像学数据,检查系统性冠状动脉风险评估风险估计与冠状动脉钙化和颈动脉斑块之间的关联。
39.5%的人存在冠状动脉钙化,56.0%的人存在颈动脉斑块。在男性中,50-54 岁和 60-65 岁年龄组的冠状动脉钙评分>0 的范围分别为 40.7-65.9%和颈动脉斑块的存在率分别为 54.5%-72.8%。在女性中,相应的差异分别为 17.1-38.9%和 41.0-58.4%。系统性冠状动脉风险评估增加一倍与冠状动脉钙评分>0 的概率增加相关(比值比:2.18(95%置信区间 2.07-2.30))和存在>1 个颈动脉斑块(1.67(1.61-1.74))。
在没有既定心血管疾病或糖尿病的一般人群样本中,系统性冠状动脉风险评估估计的风险与两个主要血管床的普遍亚临床动脉粥样硬化相关。因此,系统性冠状动脉风险评估风险图表可能有助于估计亚临床动脉粥样硬化的风险。