Mosti Mats Peder, Aagård Norun, Stunes Astrid Kamilla, Brobakken Cathrine Langlie, Brevig Martin Siksjø, Gustafsson Miriam K, Thorsby Per Medbøe, Wang Eivind, Syversen Unni
Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU, Trondheim, NORWAY.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2025 Jun 1;57(6):1189-1201. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003658. Epub 2025 Jan 24.
The effect of exercise on serum concentration of vitamin D metabolites remains inconclusive, with studies reporting deviating results. This study evaluated the acute effect of a single session of two specific exercise forms; strength training (ST) and high-intensity interval training (HIIT), on circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), free 25(OH)D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH) 2 D), and skeletal muscle vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene expression, in healthy adults.
Thirty-nine participants (19 women and 20 men, aged 21-30 yr) completed a single bout of ST and HIIT exercise, separated by 2 weeks. Serum concentration of total 25(OH)D, free 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH) 2 D were assessed before exercise, immediately after, and 3 and 24 h after each session. Muscle biopsies were obtained at rest (first visit), and at 3 and 24 h post ST and HIIT, and analyzed for VDR gene expression. Repeated-measures ANOVA was used to assess serum concentration across time, whereas a one-way ANOVA was used for muscle VDR gene expression analyses.
Serum concentration of 25(OH)D or free 25(OH)D did not change after either exercise mode when correcting for plasma volume alterations. 1,25(OH) 2 D was reduced by 13.1 ± 18.3 pmol·L -1 and 7.1 ± 9.6 pmol·L -1 immediately after ST and HIIT, respectively ( P < 0.001). Muscle VDR mRNA expression increased after ST by 3.1 ± 1.8 (3 h) and 2.2 ± 1.7 (24 h) fold change ( P < 0.05).
One single session of ST or HIIT did not alter serum concentration of 25(OH)D and free 25(OH)D when correcting for plasma volume changes. Both exercise modes caused a transient reduction in 1,25(OH) 2 D suggesting utilization of 1,25(OH) 2 D by muscle cells after exercise. Elevated VDR gene expression after ST suggests a functional role of VDR in fast-twitch muscle fibers.
运动对血清维生素D代谢产物浓度的影响尚无定论,各项研究报告的结果存在差异。本研究评估了单次特定两种运动形式,即力量训练(ST)和高强度间歇训练(HIIT),对健康成年人循环25-羟基维生素D(25(OH)D)、游离25(OH)D和1,25-二羟基维生素D(1,25(OH)₂D)以及骨骼肌维生素D受体(VDR)基因表达的急性影响。
39名参与者(19名女性和20名男性,年龄21 - 30岁)完成了单次ST和HIIT运动,两次运动间隔2周。在每次运动前、运动后即刻、运动后3小时和24小时评估血清总25(OH)D、游离25(OH)D和1,25(OH)₂D的浓度。在静息状态(首次就诊)以及ST和HIIT运动后3小时和24小时采集肌肉活检样本,并分析VDR基因表达。采用重复测量方差分析评估不同时间点的血清浓度,而采用单因素方差分析进行肌肉VDR基因表达分析。
在校正血浆容量变化后,两种运动模式后血清25(OH)D或游离25(OH)D浓度均未改变。ST和HIIT运动后即刻,1,25(OH)₂D分别降低了13.1±18.3 pmol·L⁻¹和7.1±9.6 pmol·L⁻¹(P<0.001)。ST运动后肌肉VDR mRNA表达在3小时增加了3.1±1.8倍,24小时增加了2.2±1.7倍(P<0.05)。
在校正血浆容量变化后,单次ST或HIIT运动未改变血清25(OH)D和游离25(OH)D浓度。两种运动模式均导致1,25(OH)₂D短暂降低,提示运动后肌肉细胞对1,25(OH)₂D的利用。ST运动后VDR基因表达升高表明VDR在快肌纤维中发挥功能作用。