Suppr超能文献

注意缺陷多动障碍中的情绪加工困难:一项贝叶斯元分析研究。

Emotion processing difficulties in ADHD: a Bayesian meta-analysis study.

作者信息

Soler-Gutiérrez Ana-María, Sánchez-Carmona Alberto J, Albert Jacobo, Hinojosa José Antonio, Cortese Samuele, Bellato Alessio, Mayas Julia

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Despacho 2.36 bis, Calle Juan del Rosal, 10, 28040, Madrid, Spain.

Escuela Internacional de Doctorado de la UNED (EIDUNED), Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 24. doi: 10.1007/s00787-025-02647-3.

Abstract

We investigated whether there is an emotional processing deficit in ADHD and whether this only applies to specific emotional categories. In this PRISMA-compliant systematic review based on a pre-registered protocol ( https://osf.io/egp7d ), we searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, ERIC, Scopus and Web of Science databases until 3rd December 2023, to identify empirical studies comparing emotional processing in individuals meeting DSM (version III to 5-TR) or ICD (version 9 or 10) criteria for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and in a non-psychiatric control group. Study quality was assessed with the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS). Eighty studies were included and meta-analysed (encompassing 6191 participants and 465 observations). Bayesian meta-analyses were conducted to compare individuals with ADHD and non-psychiatric controls on overall emotional processing measures (meta-analysis 1) and across emotional categories (meta-analysis 2). The type of stimulus employed, outcome measurement reported, age, sex, and medication status were analysed as moderators. We found poorer performance in both overall emotion processing (g =  - 0.65) and across emotional categories (anger g =  - 0.37; disgust g =  - 0.24; fear g =  - 0.37; sadness g =  - 0.34; surprise g =  - 0.26; happiness/positive g =  - 0.31; negative g =  - 0.20; neutral g =  - 0.25) for individuals with ADHD compared to non-psychiatric controls. Scales items and accuracy outcome being the most effective moderators in detecting such differences. No effects of age, sex, or medication status were found. Overall, these results show that impaired emotional processing is a relevant feature of ADHD and suggest that it should be systematically assessed in clinical practice.

摘要

我们研究了注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)患者是否存在情绪加工缺陷,以及这是否仅适用于特定的情绪类别。在这项基于预先注册方案(https://osf.io/egp7d)且符合PRISMA标准的系统评价中,我们检索了MEDLINE、PsycINFO、ERIC、Scopus和Web of Science数据库,直至2023年12月3日,以识别比较符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM,第三版至5-TR)或《国际疾病分类》(ICD,第九版或第十版)注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)标准的个体与非精神科对照组的情绪加工的实证研究。使用横断面研究评估工具(AXIS)对研究质量进行评估。纳入80项研究并进行荟萃分析(涉及6191名参与者和465项观察)。进行贝叶斯荟萃分析,以比较ADHD患者与非精神科对照组在整体情绪加工指标(荟萃分析1)和不同情绪类别(荟萃分析2)上的差异。将所采用的刺激类型、报告的结果测量、年龄、性别和用药状态作为调节因素进行分析。我们发现,与非精神科对照组相比,ADHD患者在整体情绪加工(g = -0.65)以及不同情绪类别(愤怒g = -0.37;厌恶g = -0.24;恐惧g = -0.37;悲伤g = -0.34;惊讶g = -0.26;快乐/积极g = -0.31;消极g = -0.20;中性g = -0.25)方面的表现均较差。量表项目和准确性结果是检测此类差异最有效的调节因素。未发现年龄、性别或用药状态的影响。总体而言,这些结果表明情绪加工受损是ADHD的一个相关特征,并建议在临床实践中对其进行系统评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验