Suppr超能文献

低强度激光疗法与神经肌肉电刺激对偏瘫肩痛和上肢功能影响的比较

Comparison of low-level laser therapy versus neuromuscular electrical nerve stimulation at hemiplegic shoulder pain and upper extremity functions.

作者信息

Başaran Pınar Özge, Büyükşireci Dilek Eker

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hitit University Erol Olçok Education and Research Hospital, Çorum, Turkey.

出版信息

Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Jan 24;40(1):42. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04305-1.

Abstract

This study aimed to assess and compare the effectiveness of adding low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and neuromuscular electrical nerve stimulation (NMES) to conventional physical therapy exercises, for stroke patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain (HSP). Seventy-five stroke patients with shoulder pain were included in this prospective randomized controlled study. Participants were divided into three groups. All patients underwent a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program five days a week for four weeks for a total of twenty sessions with classical physical therapy exercises. In addition, Group 1 received LLLT for three days a week for four weeks. Group 2 received NMES for twenty minutes for five days a week for four weeks. Group 3 control group received classical physical therapy exercises. Brunnstrom (BRS) upper extremity, BRS Hand, Barthel index, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), Fugl Meyer, Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and visual analog scale (VAS) were assessed, prior to the treatment and at the end of four weeks. After treatment, statistically significant improvements were found in BRS upper extremity, BRS Hand, Barthel index, SPADI, Fugl Meyer and VAS in all three groups (all p < 0.005). When the groups were compared, significant improvements in Bartel, SPADI and VAS in the LLLT and NMES groups than the control group(all p < 0.005), however the LLLT and NMES groups were statistically similar. LLLT, NMES and conventional exercise therapy have demonstrated efficacy in treating HSP and improving upper extremity functions and disability. Laser and NMES were more effective while the effects of laser and NMES were similar.

摘要

本研究旨在评估并比较在传统物理治疗运动基础上增加低强度激光治疗(LLLT)和神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)对偏瘫性肩痛(HSP)中风患者的有效性。本前瞻性随机对照研究纳入了75例患有肩痛的中风患者。参与者被分为三组。所有患者每周进行五天的多学科康复计划,为期四周,共进行20次经典物理治疗运动。此外,第1组每周接受三次LLLT治疗,为期四周。第2组每周五天接受20分钟的NMES治疗,为期四周。第3组对照组接受经典物理治疗运动。在治疗前和四周结束时评估Brunnstrom(BRS)上肢、BRS手部、Barthel指数、肩痛与功能障碍指数(SPADI)、Fugl Meyer、改良Ashworth量表(MAS)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)。治疗后,三组患者的BRS上肢、BRS手部、Barthel指数、SPADI、Fugl Meyer和VAS均有统计学意义的改善(所有p < 0.005)。比较各组时,LLLT组和NMES组的Bartel、SPADI和VAS改善程度均显著高于对照组(所有p < 0.005),但LLLT组和NMES组在统计学上相似。LLLT、NMES和传统运动疗法在治疗HSP以及改善上肢功能和残疾方面均显示出疗效。激光和NMES更有效,而激光和NMES的效果相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7cb/11761826/f14e051ac445/10103_2025_4305_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验