• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响抗生素处方的背景因素:全科医生实习生的离散选择实验

Contextual Factors that Influence Antibiotic Prescribing: A Discrete Choice Experiment of GP Registrars.

作者信息

Merlo Gregory, Hall Lisa, Magin Parker, Tapley Amanda, Mulquiney Katie J, Fielding Alison, Davey Andrew, Davies Joshua, van Driel Mieke

机构信息

School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Healthcare Improvement Unit, Clinical Excellence Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Mar;23(2):311-317. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-00944-1. Epub 2025 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1007/s40258-025-00944-1
PMID:39853598
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11811472/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Antimicrobial resistance is a global emergency related to overprescribing of antibiotics. Few studies have explored how prescribing behaviours may change as the consequence of changing resistance. Understanding how contextual factors influence antibiotic prescribing will facilitate improved communication strategies to promote appropriate antibiotic prescribing. We aimed to develop and conduct a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to measure how contextual factors influence intended antibiotic prescribing of general practitioner (GP) registrars.

METHODS

Factors included as attributes in the DCE were level of antibiotic resistance, requirement for an authority to prescribe, existence of a Practice Incentives Program (PIP) for low prescribing and supervisor support for low prescribing. The survey was administered in an online format for GP registrars undergoing training between 2020 and 2021. Regression analysis using a conditional logit model with interaction effects was used on the basis of the assumptions of independence of irrelevant alternatives, independence of error terms and no preference heterogeneity.

RESULTS

In total, 617 unique respondents answered at least one choice set question. Respondents showed significant preference for avoiding prescribing antibiotics when antibiotic resistance was 25-35% or 40-60% compared with 5-8%. There was also a significant preference for avoiding prescribing when an authority to prescribe was required, or when there was supervisory support of low antibiotic prescribing. In the main effects analysis, respondents were significantly less likely to choose a prescribing option if there was a PIP; however, when interaction effects were included in the regression analysis there was a significant interaction between PIP and resistance rates, but the preference weights for PIP was no longer significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge about community resistance impacts the stated intention of GP registrars to prescribe antibiotics. The use of the DCE may have made it possible to determine factors influencing prescribing that would not be detected using other survey methods. These findings provide guidance for producing, explaining and communicating issues regarding antibiotic prescribing to GP registrars.

摘要

引言

抗生素耐药性是一个与抗生素过度处方相关的全球紧急情况。很少有研究探讨随着耐药性的变化,处方行为可能如何改变。了解背景因素如何影响抗生素处方将有助于改进沟通策略,以促进合理的抗生素处方。我们旨在开展并进行一项离散选择实验(DCE),以衡量背景因素如何影响全科医生(GP)注册实习生的预期抗生素处方。

方法

作为DCE属性纳入的因素包括抗生素耐药水平、处方授权要求、低处方量的实践激励计划(PIP)的存在以及低处方量的上级支持。该调查以在线形式对2020年至2021年期间接受培训的GP注册实习生进行。基于无关替代品独立性、误差项独立性和无偏好异质性的假设,使用具有交互效应的条件logit模型进行回归分析。

结果

共有617名不同的受访者回答了至少一个选择集问题。与5%-8%相比,当抗生素耐药率为25%-35%或40%-60%时,受访者表现出明显倾向于避免开具抗生素处方。当需要处方授权或有低抗生素处方的上级支持时,也有明显的避免处方倾向。在主效应分析中,如果存在PIP,受访者选择处方选项的可能性显著降低;然而,当回归分析中纳入交互效应时,PIP与耐药率之间存在显著交互作用,但PIP的偏好权重不再显著。

结论

关于社区耐药性的知识会影响GP注册实习生开具抗生素处方的既定意图。DCE的使用可能使确定影响处方的因素成为可能,而这些因素使用其他调查方法无法检测到。这些发现为向GP注册实习生提出、解释和传达有关抗生素处方的问题提供了指导。

相似文献

1
Contextual Factors that Influence Antibiotic Prescribing: A Discrete Choice Experiment of GP Registrars.影响抗生素处方的背景因素:全科医生实习生的离散选择实验
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Mar;23(2):311-317. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-00944-1. Epub 2025 Jan 24.
2
Prevalence of Antibiotic Prescribing for Acute Respiratory Tract Infection in Telehealth Versus Face-to-Face Consultations: Cross-Sectional Analysis of General Practice Registrars' Clinical Practice.远程医疗与面对面咨询中急性呼吸道感染抗生素处方的患病率:全科医生注册学员临床实践的横断面分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 13;27:e60831. doi: 10.2196/60831.
3
Antibiotic prescribing for upper respiratory tract infections and acute bronchitis: a longitudinal analysis of general practitioner trainees.上呼吸道感染和急性支气管炎的抗生素处方:全科医生培训生的纵向分析。
Fam Pract. 2022 Nov 22;39(6):1063-1069. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmac052.
4
Reducing early career general practitioners' antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections: a pragmatic prospective non-randomised controlled trial.减少早期职业全科医生对呼吸道感染的抗生素处方:一项实用的前瞻性非随机对照试验。
Fam Pract. 2018 Jan 16;35(1):53-60. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmx070.
5
Temporal patterns of antibiotic prescribing for sore throat, otitis media, and sinusitis: a longitudinal study of general practitioner registrars.咽喉痛、中耳炎和鼻窦炎抗生素处方的时间模式:全科医生住院医师的纵向研究。
Fam Pract. 2024 Jun 12;41(3):283-291. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmad055.
6
Changes in early-career family physicians' antibiotic prescribing for upper respiratory tract infection and acute bronchitis: a multicentre longitudinal study.早期职业家庭医生对上呼吸道感染和急性支气管炎的抗生素处方变化:一项多中心纵向研究。
Fam Pract. 2016 Aug;33(4):360-7. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw025. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
7
Changing the antibiotic prescribing of Australian general practice registrars' for acute respiratory tract infections: a non-randomized controlled trial.改变澳大利亚普通科住院医生对急性呼吸道感染的抗生素处方:一项非随机对照试验。
Fam Pract. 2025 Feb 7;42(2). doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmaf005.
8
Delayed prescribing of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections by GP registrars: a qualitative study.全科住院医师延迟开具急性呼吸道感染抗生素处方:一项定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2020 Jul 23;37(3):406-411. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmz079.
9
Antibiotic prescribing for the future: exploring the attitudes of trainees in general practice.未来的抗生素处方:探索全科医学实习医生的态度。
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Sep;64(626):e561-7. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X681373.
10
Antibiotic prescribing patterns of general practice registrars for infective conjunctivitis: a cross-sectional analysis.全科住院医师治疗传染性结膜炎的抗生素处方模式:一项横断面分析。
J Prim Health Care. 2021 Mar;13(1):5-14. doi: 10.1071/HC20040.

引用本文的文献

1
Similarities in the consumption trajectory of antibacterial drugs in the outpatient care sector in Germany from 1986 to 2022: identification of shared patterns, correlation analysis of prescribed defined daily dose and assessment of underlying influences.1986年至2022年德国门诊护理部门抗菌药物消费轨迹的相似性:共享模式的识别、规定日剂量的相关性分析及潜在影响评估
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025 Apr 23. doi: 10.1007/s00210-025-04165-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Antibiotic prescribing in primary healthcare: Dominant factors and trade-offs in decision-making.基层医疗中的抗生素处方:决策中的主导因素与权衡
Infect Dis Health. 2018 Jun;23(2):74-86. doi: 10.1016/j.idh.2017.12.002. Epub 2018 May 7.
2
Early-career general practitioners' antibiotic prescribing for acute infections: a systematic review.早期职业全科医生治疗急性感染的抗生素处方:系统评价。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2024 Mar 1;79(3):512-525. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae002.
3
Weighing patient attributes in antibiotic prescribing for upper respiratory tract infections: A discrete choice experiment on primary care physicians in Hubei Province, China.权衡上呼吸道感染抗生素处方中患者特征的重要性:基于中国湖北省基层医疗机构医生的离散选择实验。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 20;10:1008217. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1008217. eCollection 2022.
4
Prescribing antibiotics: Factors driving decision-making in general practice. A discrete choice experiment.开具抗生素处方:全科医疗决策的驱动因素。离散选择实验。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jul;305:115033. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115033. Epub 2022 May 16.
5
Identifying women's preferences for treatment of urinary tract infection: a discrete choice experiment.识别女性对治疗尿路感染的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 16;11(11):e049916. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049916.
6
Preferences for Medical Consultations from Online Providers: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in the United Kingdom.患者对在线医疗服务提供商的偏好:来自英国离散选择实验的证据。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021 Jul;19(4):521-535. doi: 10.1007/s40258-021-00642-8. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
7
Systematic review and validity assessment of methods used in discrete choice experiments of primary healthcare professionals.基层医疗专业人员离散选择实验中所用方法的系统评价与效度评估
Health Econ Rev. 2020 Dec 9;10(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13561-020-00295-8.
8
Preferences regarding antibiotic treatment and the role of antibiotic resistance: A discrete choice experiment.抗生素治疗偏好及抗生素耐药性的作用:一项离散选择实验。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Dec;56(6):106198. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106198. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
9
Why do hospital prescribers continue antibiotics when it is safe to stop? Results of a choice experiment survey.为什么医院开处方者在安全停药时仍继续开抗生素?一项选择实验调查的结果。
BMC Med. 2020 Jul 30;18(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01660-4.
10
Factors associated with antibiotic prescribing for adults with acute conditions: an umbrella review across primary care and a systematic review focusing on primary dental care.与急性病成年人抗生素处方相关的因素:初级保健的伞式综述和侧重于初级牙科保健的系统综述。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Aug 1;74(8):2139-2152. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz152.