Suppr超能文献

为什么医院开处方者在安全停药时仍继续开抗生素?一项选择实验调查的结果。

Why do hospital prescribers continue antibiotics when it is safe to stop? Results of a choice experiment survey.

机构信息

Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.

NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med. 2020 Jul 30;18(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01660-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Deciding whether to discontinue antibiotics at early review is a cornerstone of hospital antimicrobial stewardship practice worldwide. In England, this approach is described in government guidance ('Start Smart then Focus'). However, < 10% of hospital antibiotic prescriptions are discontinued at review, despite evidence that 20-30% could be discontinued safely. We aimed to quantify the relative importance of factors influencing prescriber decision-making at review.

METHODS

We conducted an online choice experiment, a survey method to elicit preferences. Acute/general hospital prescribers in England were asked if they would continue or discontinue antibiotic treatment in 15 hypothetical scenarios. Scenarios were described according to six attributes, including patients' presenting symptoms and whether discontinuation would conflict with local prescribing guidelines. Respondents' choices were analysed using conditional logistic regression.

RESULTS

One hundred respondents completed the survey. Respondents were more likely to continue antibiotics when discontinuation would 'strongly conflict' with local guidelines (average marginal effect (AME) on the probability of continuing + 0.194 (p < 0.001)), when presenting symptoms more clearly indicated antibiotics (AME of urinary tract infection symptoms + 0.173 (p < 0.001) versus unclear symptoms) and when patients had severe frailty/comorbidities (AME = + 0.101 (p < 0.001)). Respondents were less likely to continue antibiotics when under no external pressure to continue (AME = - 0.101 (p < 0.001)). Decisions were also influenced by the risks to patient health of continuing/discontinuing antibiotic treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Guidelines that conflict with antibiotic discontinuation (e.g. pre-specify fixed durations) may discourage safe discontinuation at review. In contrast, guidelines conditional on patient factors/treatment response could help hospital prescribers discontinue antibiotics if diagnostic information suggesting they are no longer needed is available.

摘要

背景

在早期审查时决定是否停止使用抗生素是全球医院抗菌药物管理实践的基石。在英国,这种方法在政府指南(“明智开始,然后聚焦”)中有描述。然而,尽管有证据表明 20-30%的抗生素可以安全停用,但只有<10%的医院抗生素处方在审查时被停用。我们旨在量化影响审查时处方决策的因素的相对重要性。

方法

我们进行了一项在线选择实验,这是一种用于获取偏好的调查方法。英国的急性/综合医院的医生被要求在 15 个假设情景中决定是否继续或停止抗生素治疗。根据六个属性描述情景,包括患者的表现症状以及停药是否与当地处方指南冲突。使用条件逻辑回归分析受访者的选择。

结果

有 100 名受访者完成了调查。当停药“严重冲突”当地指南时(继续使用抗生素的概率平均边际效应(AME)+0.194(p<0.001)),当表现症状更清楚地表明需要使用抗生素时(尿路感染症状 AME+0.173(p<0.001)与症状不明确时),以及当患者有严重虚弱/合并症时(AME=+0.101(p<0.001)),受访者更有可能继续使用抗生素。当没有继续使用抗生素的外部压力时(AME=-0.101(p<0.001)),受访者不太可能继续使用抗生素。决策还受到继续/停止抗生素治疗对患者健康风险的影响。

结论

与抗生素停药相冲突的指南(例如,预先指定固定的持续时间)可能会阻碍在审查时进行安全停药。相比之下,如果有提示抗生素不再需要的诊断信息,则根据患者因素/治疗反应制定的指南可以帮助医院医生停止使用抗生素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35dd/7391515/887fb30282cc/12916_2020_1660_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验