Williams Beth E, Martin Stephen A, Hoffman Kim A, Andrus Mason D, Dellabough-Gormley Elona, Buchheit Bradley M
Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, UMass Chan School of Medicine, 55 N Lake Ave, Worcester, MA, 01655, USA.
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2025 Mar 7;20(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13722-025-00555-0.
Buprenorphine is an effective first-line treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) that substantially reduces morbidity and mortality. For patients using illicitly-manufactured fentanyl (IMF), however, transitioning to buprenorphine can be challenging. Evidence is lacking for how best to make this transition in the outpatient setting. A shared decision-making (SDM) approach has been found to benefit patients with OUD but has not been studied for buprenorphine initiation. We sought to explore participants' experiences with a SDM approach to buprenorphine initiation.
Participants were seeking care at a low barrier, telehealth buprenorphine clinic. Clinicians implemented a standardized SDM approach whereby they offered patients using IMF three options for buprenorphine initiation (traditional, low-dose, and QuickStart). They elicited patient goals and preferences and discussed the pros and cons of each method to come to a shared decision. Patients meeting study criteria were invited to participate in semi-structured qualitative interviews 1-2 weeks after the initial visit. Interviews focused on experiences with the clinical visit, suggestions for enhancing the treatment experience, and patient factors affecting the method they chose. Interviews were coded and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Twenty participants completed interviews. Participants' mean age was 33, they were 50% female, predominantly white (16 [80%]), and most had Medicaid insurance (19 [95%]). We identified three important themes. First, participants found SDM acceptable and a positive addition to their OUD treatment. They felt their opinion mattered and reported that SDM gave them important control over their care plan. Second, patient goals, preferences, and past experiences with buprenorphine-associated withdrawal impacted what type of buprenorphine initiation method they chose. Finally, participants had advice for clinicians to improve SDM counseling. Participant recommendations included ensuring patients are informed that withdrawal (or "feeling sick") can occur with any initiation method, that buprenorphine will eventually "block" fentanyl effects once at a high enough dose, and that clinicians provide specific advice for tapering off fentanyl during a low dose initiation.
For patients with OUD using IMF, shared decision-making is an acceptable approach to buprenorphine initiation in the outpatient setting. It can enhance patient autonomy and lead to an individualized approach to OUD care.
丁丙诺啡是治疗阿片类物质使用障碍(OUD)的一种有效的一线疗法,可大幅降低发病率和死亡率。然而,对于使用非法制造的芬太尼(IMF)的患者而言,过渡到使用丁丙诺啡可能具有挑战性。目前缺乏关于如何在门诊环境中最佳地实现这种过渡的证据。已发现共同决策(SDM)方法对患有OUD的患者有益,但尚未针对丁丙诺啡起始治疗进行研究。我们试图探讨参与者对丁丙诺啡起始治疗采用SDM方法的体验。
参与者在一家低门槛的远程医疗丁丙诺啡诊所寻求治疗。临床医生实施了一种标准化的SDM方法,即他们为使用IMF的患者提供三种丁丙诺啡起始治疗方案(传统方案、低剂量方案和快速启动方案)。他们引出患者的目标和偏好,并讨论每种方法的利弊以达成共同决策。符合研究标准的患者在初次就诊后1 - 2周被邀请参加半结构化定性访谈。访谈聚焦于临床就诊体验、改善治疗体验的建议以及影响他们所选方法的患者因素。访谈采用反思性主题分析进行编码和分析。
20名参与者完成了访谈。参与者的平均年龄为33岁,50%为女性,主要是白人(16人[80%]),且大多数拥有医疗补助保险(19人[95%])。我们确定了三个重要主题。首先,参与者认为SDM是可接受的,并且是对他们OUD治疗的一项积极补充。他们觉得自己的意见很重要,并报告称SDM让他们对护理计划有了重要的掌控权。其次,患者的目标、偏好以及过去与丁丙诺啡相关的戒断经历影响了他们选择何种类型的丁丙诺啡起始治疗方法。最后,参与者对临床医生改善SDM咨询提出了建议。参与者的建议包括确保患者了解任何起始治疗方法都可能出现戒断反应(或“感觉不适”),丁丙诺啡一旦达到足够高的剂量最终会“阻断”芬太尼的作用,以及临床医生在低剂量起始治疗期间为逐渐减少芬太尼用量提供具体建议。
对于使用IMF的OUD患者,共同决策是门诊环境中丁丙诺啡起始治疗的一种可接受的方法。它可以增强患者自主性,并导致针对OUD护理的个体化方法。