• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于生理信号的动态情绪强度估计:通过评价理论促进解读

Dynamic emotion intensity estimation from physiological signals facilitating interpretation via appraisal theory.

作者信息

Barradas Isabel, Tschiesner Reinhard, Peer Angelika

机构信息

Faculty of Engineering, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, South Tyrol, Italy.

Faculty of Education, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Brixen, South Tyrol, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jan 24;20(1):e0315929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315929. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0315929
PMID:39854531
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11759405/
Abstract

Appraisal models, such as the Scherer's Component Process Model (CPM), represent an elegant framework for the interpretation of emotion processes, advocating for computational models that capture emotion dynamics. Today's emotion recognition research, however, typically classifies discrete qualities or categorised dimensions, neglecting the dynamic nature of emotional processes and thus limiting interpretability based on appraisal theory. In our research, we estimate emotion intensity from multiple physiological features associated to the CPM's neurophysiological component using dynamical models with the aim of bringing insights into the relationship between physiological dynamics and perceived emotion intensity. To this end, we employ nonlinear autoregressive exogeneous (NARX) models, as their parameters can be interpreted within the CPM. In our experiment, emotions of varying intensities are induced for three distinct qualities while physiological signals are measured, and participants assess their subjective feeling in real time. Using data-extracted physiological features, we train intrasubject and intersubject intensity models using a genetic algorithm, which outperform traditional sliding-window linear regression, providing a robust basis for interpretation. The NARX model parameters obtained, interpreted by appraisal theory, indicate consistent heart rate parameters in the intersubject models, suggesting a large temporal contribution that aligns with the CPM-predicted changes.

摘要

评估模型,如谢勒的成分过程模型(CPM),为情感过程的解释提供了一个精妙的框架,提倡采用能够捕捉情感动态的计算模型。然而,当今的情感识别研究通常对离散特质或分类维度进行分类,忽视了情感过程的动态本质,从而限制了基于评估理论的可解释性。在我们的研究中,我们使用动态模型从与CPM的神经生理成分相关的多个生理特征来估计情感强度,目的是深入了解生理动态与感知到的情感强度之间的关系。为此,我们采用非线性自回归外生(NARX)模型,因为其参数可以在CPM中得到解释。在我们的实验中,在测量生理信号的同时,针对三种不同特质诱发不同强度的情感,并且参与者实时评估他们的主观感受。利用从数据中提取的生理特征,我们使用遗传算法训练个体内和个体间强度模型,其性能优于传统的滑动窗口线性回归,为解释提供了坚实的基础。通过评估理论解释所获得的NARX模型参数,表明个体间模型中的心率参数一致,这表明与CPM预测变化相符的较大时间贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1fc/11759405/8e8cca4e343b/pone.0315929.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1fc/11759405/58109c9b985a/pone.0315929.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1fc/11759405/f421a4e38f47/pone.0315929.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1fc/11759405/fd1fad0a2aa1/pone.0315929.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1fc/11759405/33e4f5dbac09/pone.0315929.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1fc/11759405/2ba0a90229f4/pone.0315929.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1fc/11759405/fc4eb6b86471/pone.0315929.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1fc/11759405/f534c8d30e2e/pone.0315929.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1fc/11759405/fc54cc3aeb32/pone.0315929.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1fc/11759405/8e8cca4e343b/pone.0315929.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1fc/11759405/58109c9b985a/pone.0315929.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1fc/11759405/f421a4e38f47/pone.0315929.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1fc/11759405/fd1fad0a2aa1/pone.0315929.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1fc/11759405/33e4f5dbac09/pone.0315929.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1fc/11759405/2ba0a90229f4/pone.0315929.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1fc/11759405/fc4eb6b86471/pone.0315929.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1fc/11759405/f534c8d30e2e/pone.0315929.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1fc/11759405/fc54cc3aeb32/pone.0315929.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1fc/11759405/8e8cca4e343b/pone.0315929.g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Dynamic emotion intensity estimation from physiological signals facilitating interpretation via appraisal theory.基于生理信号的动态情绪强度估计:通过评价理论促进解读
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 24;20(1):e0315929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315929. eCollection 2025.
2
Reliable emotion recognition system based on dynamic adaptive fusion of forehead biopotentials and physiological signals.基于前额生物电势和生理信号动态自适应融合的可靠情绪识别系统。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2015 Nov;122(2):149-64. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.07.006. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
3
Reliability of Physiological Responses Induced by Basic Emotions: A Pilot Study.基本情绪诱发的生理反应的可靠性:一项初步研究。
J Physiol Anthropol. 2019 Nov 28;38(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40101-019-0209-y.
4
A systems approach to appraisal mechanisms in emotion.一种针对情绪评估机制的系统方法。
Neural Netw. 2005 May;18(4):317-52. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2005.03.001.
5
The semantic structure of emotion words across languages is consistent with componential appraisal models of emotion.跨语言的情感词汇语义结构与情感的成分评估模型一致。
Cogn Emot. 2019 Jun;33(4):673-682. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1481369. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
6
A nonlinear heartbeat dynamics model approach for personalized emotion recognition.一种用于个性化情感识别的非线性心跳动力学模型方法。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013;2013:2579-82. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2013.6610067.
7
Studying the dynamics of autonomic activity during emotional experience.研究情绪体验过程中自主神经活动的动态变化。
Psychophysiology. 2014 Nov;51(11):1101-11. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12261. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
8
Heart sound signals can be used for emotion recognition.心音信号可用于情绪识别。
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 24;9(1):6486. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42826-2.
9
Coherence explored between emotion components: evidence from event-related potentials and facial electromyography.情绪成分间的相干性探索:来自事件相关电位和面部肌电图的证据。
Biol Psychol. 2014 Apr;98:70-81. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.11.007. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
10
Musical emotions: predicting second-by-second subjective feelings of emotion from low-level psychoacoustic features and physiological measurements.音乐情感:从低水平的心理声学特征和生理测量数据预测音乐的逐秒主观情感感受。
Emotion. 2011 Aug;11(4):921-37. doi: 10.1037/a0024700.

本文引用的文献

1
LSTM-Based Emotion Detection Using Physiological Signals: IoT Framework for Healthcare and Distance Learning in COVID-19.基于长短期记忆网络的生理信号情感检测:COVID-19疫情下用于医疗保健和远程学习的物联网框架
IEEE Internet Things J. 2020 Dec 10;8(23):16863-16871. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2020.3044031. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Fear Recognition for Women Using a Reduced Set of Physiological Signals.利用简化的生理信号集对女性进行恐惧识别。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Feb 25;21(5):1587. doi: 10.3390/s21051587.
3
Recognition of Emotion Intensities Using Machine Learning Algorithms: A Comparative Study.
基于机器学习算法的情感强度识别:一项比较研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Apr 21;19(8):1897. doi: 10.3390/s19081897.
4
The Emotion Process: Event Appraisal and Component Differentiation.情绪过程:事件评价与成分区分。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;70:719-745. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011854. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
5
Emotion recognition from multichannel EEG signals using K-nearest neighbor classification.使用K近邻分类法从多通道脑电图信号中进行情绪识别。
Technol Health Care. 2018;26(S1):509-519. doi: 10.3233/THC-174836.
6
Variability in anger intensity profiles: structure and predictive basis.愤怒强度概况的变异性:结构与预测基础。
Cogn Emot. 2015;29(1):168-77. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2014.896783. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
7
Emotions are emergent processes: they require a dynamic computational architecture.情绪是涌现的过程:它们需要一个动态的计算架构。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Dec 12;364(1535):3459-74. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0141.
8
Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential.测量情绪:自评人偶法与语义差异法。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1994 Mar;25(1):49-59. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9.