• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用从第二波新冠疫情中收集的“OUR-ARCad”风险评分预测死亡率并确定三级医疗的优先顺序——一项来自印度南部的回顾性队列研究

Prediction of mortality and prioritisation to tertiary care using the 'OUR-ARCad' risk score gleaned from the second wave of COVID-19 pandemic-A retrospective cohort study from South India.

作者信息

Gopalan Narendran, Viswanathan Vinod Kumar, Srinivasalu Vignes Anand, Arumugam Saranya, Bhaskar Adhin, Manoharan Tamizhselvan, Chandrasekar Santosh Kishor, Bujagaruban Divya, Arumugham Ramya, Jagadeeswaran Gopi, Pandian Saravanan Madurai, Ponniah Arunalatha, Senguttuvan Thirumaran, Chinnaiyan Ponnuraja, Dhanraj Baskaran, Chadha Vineet Kumar, Purushotham Balaji, Murhekar Manoj Vasanth

机构信息

ICMR-NIRT-Indian Council of Medical Research -National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chetpet, Chennai, India.

GSMC-Government Stanley Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, India.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jan 24;20(1):e0312993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312993. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0312993
PMID:39854588
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11761102/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Judicious utilisation of tertiary care facilities through appropriate risk stratification assumes priority, in a raging pandemic, of the nature of delta variant-predominated second wave of COVID-19 pandemic in India. Prioritisation of tertiary care, through a scientifically validated risk score, would maximise recovery without compromising individual safety, but importantly without straining the health system.

METHODS

De-identified data of COVID-19 confirmed patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital in South India, between April 1, 2021 and July 31, 2021, corresponding to the peak of COVID-19 second wave, were analysed after segregating into 'survivors' or 'non-survivors' to evaluate the risk factors for COVID-19 mortality at admission and formulate a risk score with easily obtainable but clinically relevant parameters for accurate patient triaging. The predictive ability was ascertained by the area under the receiver operator characteristics (AUROC) and the goodness of fit by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and validated using the bootstrap method.

RESULTS

Of 617 COVID-19 patients (325 survivors, 292 non-survivors), treated as per prevailing national guidelines, with a slight male predilection (358/617 [58.0%]), fatalities in the age group above and below 50 years were (217/380 [57.1%]) and (75/237 [31.6%]), p<0.001. The relative distribution of the various parameters among survivors and non-survivors including self-reported comorbidities helped to derive the individual risk scores from parameters significant in the multivariable logistic regression. The 'OUR-ARCad' risk score components were-Oxygen saturation SaO2<94%-23, Urea > 40mg/dL-15, Neutrophil/Lymphocytic ratio >3-23, Age > 50 years-8, Pulse Rate >100-8 and Coronary Artery disease-15. A summated score above 50, mandated tertiary care management (sensitivity-90%, specificity-75%; AUC-0.89), validated in 2000 bootstrap dataset.

CONCLUSIONS

The OUR-ARCad risk score, could potentially maximize recovery in a raging COVID-19 pandemic, through prioritisation of tertiary care services, neither straining the health system nor compromising patient's safety, delivering and diverting care to those who needed the most.

摘要

背景

在印度由德尔塔变异株主导的第二波新冠疫情肆虐期间,通过适当的风险分层明智地利用三级医疗设施成为当务之急。通过科学验证的风险评分对三级医疗进行优先排序,将在不影响个人安全的情况下最大限度地提高康复率,而且重要的是不会给卫生系统造成压力。

方法

对2021年4月1日至2021年7月31日期间入住印度南部一家三级医院的新冠确诊患者的去识别化数据进行分析,这段时间对应新冠疫情第二波高峰期。将患者分为“幸存者”或“非幸存者”,以评估入院时新冠死亡的风险因素,并使用易于获取但具有临床相关性的参数制定风险评分,用于准确的患者分流。通过受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)确定预测能力,通过Hosmer-Lemeshow检验确定拟合优度,并使用自助法进行验证。

结果

在按照现行国家指南治疗的617例新冠患者中(325例幸存者,292例非幸存者),男性略多(358/617 [58.0%]),50岁及以上和50岁以下年龄组的死亡人数分别为(217/380 [57.1%])和(75/237 [31.6%]),p<0.001。包括自我报告的合并症在内的幸存者和非幸存者之间各种参数的相对分布有助于从多变量逻辑回归中具有显著意义的参数得出个体风险评分。“OUR-ARCad”风险评分的组成部分为:血氧饱和度SaO2<94%-23分、尿素>40mg/dL-15分、中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值>3-23分、年龄>50岁-8分、脉搏率>100-8分和冠状动脉疾病-15分。总分超过50分需要三级医疗管理(敏感性-90%,特异性-75%;AUC-0.89),在2000个自助数据集中得到验证。

结论

“OUR-ARCad”风险评分有可能在肆虐的新冠疫情中通过优先安排三级医疗服务,既不给卫生系统造成压力,也不危及患者安全,将护理提供给最需要的人并实现分流,从而最大限度地提高康复率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f18/11761102/bc0b9cf21454/pone.0312993.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f18/11761102/8e38e19f3e6a/pone.0312993.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f18/11761102/f9fb2a9adeee/pone.0312993.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f18/11761102/bc0b9cf21454/pone.0312993.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f18/11761102/8e38e19f3e6a/pone.0312993.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f18/11761102/f9fb2a9adeee/pone.0312993.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f18/11761102/bc0b9cf21454/pone.0312993.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Prediction of mortality and prioritisation to tertiary care using the 'OUR-ARCad' risk score gleaned from the second wave of COVID-19 pandemic-A retrospective cohort study from South India.利用从第二波新冠疫情中收集的“OUR-ARCad”风险评分预测死亡率并确定三级医疗的优先顺序——一项来自印度南部的回顾性队列研究
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 24;20(1):e0312993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312993. eCollection 2025.
2
Predictors of mortality among hospitalized COVID-19 patients and risk score formulation for prioritizing tertiary care-An experience from South India.印度南部地区 COVID-19 住院患者死亡的预测因素和三级护理优先排序风险评分的制定。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 3;17(2):e0263471. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263471. eCollection 2022.
3
Risk factors associated with intensive care unit (ICU) admission and in-hospital death among adults hospitalized with COVID-19: a two-center retrospective observational study in tertiary care hospitals.与 COVID-19 住院成人入住重症监护病房(ICU)和院内死亡相关的危险因素:两家三级医院的回顾性观察性研究。
Emerg Radiol. 2021 Aug;28(4):691-697. doi: 10.1007/s10140-021-01903-8. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
4
Epidemiological & clinical characteristics & early outcome of COVID-19 patients in a tertiary care teaching hospital in India: A preliminary analysis.印度一家三级保健教学医院的 COVID-19 患者的流行病学和临床特征及早期转归:初步分析。
Indian J Med Res. 2020;152(1 & 2):100-104. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_2890_20.
5
Multivariable mortality risk prediction using machine learning for COVID-19 patients at admission (AICOVID).使用机器学习对入院的 COVID-19 患者进行多变量死亡率风险预测(AICOVID)。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 17;11(1):12801. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92146-7.
6
Mortality among adult hospitalized patients during the first wave and second wave of COVID-19 pandemic at a tertiary care center in India.印度一家三级医疗中心在新冠疫情第一波和第二波期间成年住院患者的死亡率。
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2021 Oct 11;92(2). doi: 10.4081/monaldi.2021.2034.
7
A machine-learning parsimonious multivariable predictive model of mortality risk in patients with Covid-19.一种机器学习的简洁多变量预测模型,用于预测新冠病毒患者的死亡率风险。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 27;11(1):21136. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99905-6.
8
Development and validation of a prognostic COVID-19 severity assessment (COSA) score and machine learning models for patient triage at a tertiary hospital.开发和验证一种用于三级医院患者分诊的 COVID-19 严重程度预后评估 (COSA) 评分和机器学习模型。
J Transl Med. 2021 Feb 5;19(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12967-021-02720-w.
9
Lessons from healthcare personnel screening and management during H1N1 pandemic in preparation for the impending COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary care hospital in India.印度一家三级护理医院在甲型H1N1流感大流行期间对医护人员进行筛查和管理的经验教训,为即将到来的新型冠状病毒肺炎大流行做准备。
Indian J Tuberc. 2020 Dec;67(4S):S122-S127. doi: 10.1016/j.ijtb.2020.07.024. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
10
Characteristics and outcome of critically ill patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia admitted to a tertiary care center in the United Arab Emirates during the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. A retrospective analysis.在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)肺炎危重症患者的特征和结局中,阿联酋一家三级保健中心在 SARS-CoV-2 大流行的第一波期间收治的患者。一项回顾性分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 22;16(10):e0251687. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251687. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio trend at admission predicts adverse outcome in hospitalized respiratory syncytial virus patients.入院时中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值趋势可预测住院呼吸道合胞病毒患者的不良预后。
Heliyon. 2023 May 19;9(6):e16482. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16482. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Comparisons of lymphocytes profiles and inflammatory cytokines levels in blood of patients with differed severity of infection by human adenovirus type 7.比较不同严重程度人腺病毒 7 型感染患者血液中淋巴细胞谱和炎症细胞因子水平。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Mar 22;23(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08132-z.
3
Retrospective study of comparison of clinical severity and outcome of hospitalised COVID-19 patients during the first and second waves of the pandemic in India.
印度第一波和第二波大流行期间住院 COVID-19 患者临床严重程度和结局的回顾性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 21;12(11):e062724. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062724.
4
High neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio with type 2 diabetes mellitus predicts poor prognosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a large-scale cohort study.高中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值与 2 型糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗预后不良相关:一项大规模队列研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022 Aug 13;21(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01583-9.
5
Predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for the fatality of COVID-19 patients complicated with cardiovascular diseases and/or risk factors.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对合并心血管疾病和/或危险因素的 COVID-19 患者病死率的预测价值。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 10;12(1):13606. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17567-4.
6
Major coagulation disorders and parameters in COVID-19 patients.COVID-19 患者的主要凝血障碍和参数。
Eur J Med Res. 2022 Feb 15;27(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40001-022-00655-6.
7
Plasma apolipoprotein concentrations and incident diabetes in subjects with prediabetes.空腹血浆载脂蛋白浓度与糖尿病前期患者的糖尿病发病风险。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022 Feb 7;21(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01452-5.
8
Predictors of mortality among hospitalized COVID-19 patients and risk score formulation for prioritizing tertiary care-An experience from South India.印度南部地区 COVID-19 住院患者死亡的预测因素和三级护理优先排序风险评分的制定。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 3;17(2):e0263471. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263471. eCollection 2022.
9
Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Outcome of Critically Ill Patients Admitted to Tertiary Care Intensive Care Units in India during the Peak Months of First and Second Waves of COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Analysis.印度第一波和第二波新冠疫情高峰月期间三级医疗重症监护病房收治的危重症患者临床特征及结局比较:一项回顾性分析
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 Dec;25(12):1349-1356. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24046.
10
The Second- vs First-wave COVID-19: More of the Same or a Lot Worse? A Comparison of Mortality between the Two Waves in Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Units in Nine Hospitals in Western Maharashtra.新冠疫情第二波与第一波:情况相同还是更糟?马哈拉施特拉邦西部九家医院重症监护病房收治的两波患者死亡率比较
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 Dec;25(12):1343-1348. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24042.