Lefvert A K, Link H
Ann Neurol. 1985 Jan;17(1):13-20. doi: 10.1002/ana.410170105.
Demonstration of intrathecal IgG production is employed in the diagnosis of various neurological disorders. This pathological IgG fraction in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) can be visualized directly as oligoclonal bands by electrophoresis or isoelectric focusing or can be calculated as "excess" or "synthesized" IgG according to different formulae. A comparison of the results obtained with isoelectric focusing and with five formulae showed that even though three of the formulae discriminated well between a reference population and patients with multiple sclerosis, all five gave wrong and misleading results in the presence of blood-brain barrier damage, as defined by an abnormally raised CSF/serum albumin ratio. A mathematical and statistical evaluation of the different formulae showed only those based on covariance between CSF/serum IgG and CSF/serum albumin to be valid, and these only when values of CSF/serum albumin were normal. Among the five formulae the IgG index (equal to CSF/serum IgG:CSF/serum albumin) is unique in having a comparatively small and constant maximal relative error resulting from the variation coefficients of the IgG and albumin assays. In the case of blood-brain barrier damage, there exists currently no valid procedure to calculate intrathecally produced IgG; in such instances sensitive electrophoretic or isoelectric focusing methods demonstrating oligoclonal IgG bands are most appropriate to demonstrate intrathecal IgG production.
鞘内IgG产生的检测用于多种神经系统疾病的诊断。脑脊液(CSF)中的这种病理性IgG组分可通过电泳或等电聚焦直接显示为寡克隆带,或者可根据不同公式计算为“过量”或“合成”IgG。对等电聚焦和五个公式所得结果的比较表明,尽管其中三个公式能很好地区分参考人群和多发性硬化症患者,但在存在血脑屏障损伤(由脑脊液/血清白蛋白比值异常升高定义)的情况下,所有五个公式都给出了错误且具误导性的结果。对不同公式的数学和统计学评估表明,只有基于脑脊液/血清IgG与脑脊液/血清白蛋白之间协方差的公式才有效,并且只有在脑脊液/血清白蛋白值正常时才有效。在这五个公式中,IgG指数(等于脑脊液/血清IgG:脑脊液/血清白蛋白)独特之处在于,由于IgG和白蛋白检测的变异系数,其产生的最大相对误差相对较小且恒定。在存在血脑屏障损伤的情况下,目前不存在计算鞘内产生IgG的有效方法;在这种情况下,显示寡克隆IgG带的灵敏电泳或等电聚焦方法最适合于证明鞘内IgG的产生。