Zhang Qiong, Duan Jia, Zhang Yuanmei, Yang Lei, Li Duo
Department of Geriatrics, Neijiang First People's Hospital, , Sichuan Province, Neijiang, China.
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Neijiang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Neijiang, Sichuan Province, China.
Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 24;14(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13643-025-02767-6.
Lung cancer, particularly non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Despite surgery being the main treatment for resectable NSCLC, many patients experience postoperative recurrence. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may shrink tumors and improve surgical outcomes, while adjuvant chemotherapy targets residual disease post-surgery. Recent advancements in immunotherapy have introduced its use in the perioperative phase for resectable NSCLC. This study investigates the relative benefits and potential complications of neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and perioperative immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone, focusing on event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs).
This systematic review and network meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO. The authors searched PUBMED, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients with resectable NSCLC treated with neoadjuvant/adjuvant immunotherapy or chemotherapy. Statistical analyses were performed using a frequentist network meta-analysis method in R software.
From an initial 5902 articles, 13 RCTs involving 6704 patients were included after extensive filtering. PFS: Neoadjuvant and perioperative immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy showed significant benefits compared to chemotherapy alone. OS: Perioperative immunotherapy was notably more effective than adjuvant immunotherapy and standard chemotherapy. Chemotherapy generally had fewer severe adverse effects compared to neoadjuvant and perioperative immunotherapy. However, these immunotherapy combinations are generally well tolerated.
The findings indicate that neoadjuvant and perioperative immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy can significantly improve overall survival in patients with resectable NSCLC compared to standard chemotherapy. However, additional adverse effects associated with long-term immunotherapy require careful management. The lack of significant benefits in specific subgroups suggests a need for further research. The study stresses the importance of optimizing treatment strategies and potentially reassessing immunotherapy's role in certain patient populations. Future clinical trials are anticipated to clarify these results further.
肺癌,尤其是非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC),是全球癌症相关死亡的主要原因。尽管手术是可切除NSCLC的主要治疗方法,但许多患者术后会复发。新辅助化疗可缩小肿瘤并改善手术效果,而辅助化疗则针对术后残留疾病。免疫疗法的最新进展已将其引入可切除NSCLC的围手术期使用。本研究调查了新辅助、辅助和围手术期免疫疗法联合化疗与单纯化疗相比的相对益处和潜在并发症,重点关注无事件生存期(EFS)、总生存期(OS)和不良事件(AE)。
本系统评价和网络荟萃分析遵循PRISMA指南,并在PROSPERO注册。作者在PUBMED、Embase和Cochrane数据库中搜索了涉及接受新辅助/辅助免疫疗法或化疗治疗的可切除NSCLC患者的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用R软件中的频率主义网络荟萃分析方法进行统计分析。
从最初的5902篇文章中,经过广泛筛选后纳入了13项涉及6704例患者的RCT。无进展生存期(PFS):新辅助和围手术期免疫疗法联合化疗与单纯化疗相比显示出显著益处。总生存期(OS):围手术期免疫疗法明显比辅助免疫疗法和标准化疗更有效。与新辅助和围手术期免疫疗法相比,化疗一般严重不良反应较少。然而,这些免疫疗法联合方案总体耐受性良好。
研究结果表明,与标准化疗相比,新辅助和围手术期免疫疗法联合化疗可显著提高可切除NSCLC患者的总生存期。然而,与长期免疫疗法相关的额外不良反应需要谨慎管理。特定亚组中缺乏显著益处表明需要进一步研究。该研究强调了优化治疗策略以及可能重新评估免疫疗法在某些患者群体中的作用的重要性。预计未来的临床试验将进一步阐明这些结果。