Suppr超能文献

聚醚醚酮、聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯、石墨烯及钛合金Ti6Al4V种植体支持框架的力学行为:计算机模拟研究

Mechanical Behavior of PEEK and PMMA Graphene and Ti6Al4V Implant-Supported Frameworks: In Silico Study.

作者信息

Herrero-Climent Mariano, Sanchez-Lasheras Fernando, Martinez-Lopez Jordi, Gil Javier, Brizuela-Velasco Aritza

机构信息

Porto Dental Institute, Av. De Montevideo 810, 4150-518 Porto, Portugal.

University Institute of Space Sciences and Technologies of Asturias (ICTEA), University of Oviedo, 33004 Oviedo, Spain.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2025 Jan 18;18(2):441. doi: 10.3390/ma18020441.

Abstract

A comparative analysis has been carried out between three different dental materials suitable for the prostheses manufacturing. The analysis performed is based on the finite elements method (FEM) and was made to evaluate their performance under three different loading conditions. Three different materials were modeled with 3D CAD geometry, all of them suitable to be simulated by means of a linear elastic model. The materials employed were graphene polymethyl methacrylate (G-PMMA) with 0.25% of graphene, polyether ether ketone (PEEK), and Ti6Al4V. Three loading conditions have been defined: distal, medial, and central. In all cases under study, the load was applied progressively, 5 N by 5 N until a previously fixed threshold of 25 N was reached, which always ensures that work is carried out in the elastic zone. The behavior of G-PMMA and PEEK in the tests performed is similar. Regarding maximum deformations in the model, it has been found that deformations are higher in the G-PMMA models when compared to those made of PEEK. The highest values of maximum stress according to the von Mises criteria are achieved in models made of Ti6Al4V, followed by G-PMMA and PEEK. G-PMMA is more prone to plastic deformations compared to Ti6Al4V. However, due to its relatively higher stiffness compared to other common polymers, G-PMMA is able to withstand moderate stress levels before significant deformation occurs, placing it in the intermediate position between Ti6Al4V and PEEK in terms of stress capacity. It should be noted that there is also a difference in the results obtained depending on the applied load, whether distal, medial, or central, proving that, in all simulations, it is the distal test that offers the worst results in terms of presenting a higher value for both displacement and tension. The results obtained allow us to identify the advantages and limitations of each material in terms of structural strength, mechanical behavior, and adaptability to loading conditions that simulate realistic scenarios.

摘要

对三种适用于假体制造的不同牙科材料进行了对比分析。所进行的分析基于有限元方法(FEM),旨在评估它们在三种不同加载条件下的性能。使用三维CAD几何模型对三种不同材料进行建模,所有材料都适合通过线性弹性模型进行模拟。所使用的材料为含0.25%石墨烯的石墨烯聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(G-PMMA)、聚醚醚酮(PEEK)和Ti6Al4V。定义了三种加载条件:远中、近中、中央。在所有研究的情况下,载荷逐步施加,每次增加5 N,直到达到预先设定的25 N阈值,这始终确保在弹性区内进行工作。在进行的测试中,G-PMMA和PEEK的行为相似。关于模型中的最大变形,已发现与由PEEK制成的模型相比,G-PMMA模型中的变形更大。根据冯·米塞斯准则,最大应力的最高值出现在由Ti6Al4V制成的模型中,其次是G-PMMA和PEEK。与Ti6Al4V相比,G-PMMA更容易发生塑性变形。然而,由于其与其他常见聚合物相比具有相对较高的刚度,G-PMMA在显著变形发生之前能够承受中等应力水平,在应力承受能力方面处于Ti6Al4V和PEEK之间的中间位置。应当指出,根据所施加的载荷(无论是远中、近中还是中央),所获得的结果也存在差异,这证明在所有模拟中,远中测试在位移和拉力方面呈现出更高的值,因此结果最差。所获得的结果使我们能够确定每种材料在结构强度、力学行为以及对模拟实际场景的加载条件的适应性方面的优缺点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19dd/11767088/21fde1affaa7/materials-18-00441-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验