Suppr超能文献

巴西与遵循《柳叶刀-饮食》评分相关的成本。

Cost Associated with Adherence to the EAT-Lancet Score in Brazil.

作者信息

Caldeira Thaís Cristina Marquezine, Nassif Laura, Sousa Taciana Maia de, Maia Emanuella Gomes, Fagioli Henrique Bracarense, Canella Daniela Silva, Claro Rafael Moreira

机构信息

Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 30130-100, Brazil.

Nutrition Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 30130-100, Brazil.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2025 Jan 15;17(2):289. doi: 10.3390/nu17020289.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Food prices are a crucial factor in food choices, especially for more vulnerable populations. To estimate the association between diet cost and quality, as measured by the EAT-Lancet score, across demographic groups in Brazil.

METHODS

Data from the 2017/18 Household Budget Survey were used to calculate the EAT-Lancet score, comprising 14 components. Scores ranged from 0 (low adherence) to 42 (high adherence), with emphasized components (e.g., vegetables, fruits, legumes) and limited components (e.g., red meat, sugar, eggs). Results were stratified by per capita income, geographic region, and area of residence and compared using linear regression adjusted for high and low costs. In addition, the association between the EAT-Lancet score (and its emphasized and limited components) and diet cost (continuous) was analyzed for the total population and for income tertiles.

RESULTS

The mean EAT-Lancet score was 18.65 points (range: 7 to 25) and the mean diet cost was BRL$0.65/100 kcal. Total scores showed no significant difference between low- and high-cost diets. However, limited intake was more pronounced in low-cost diets, while high-cost diets featured emphasized foods such as fruits, vegetables, and seafood. High-cost diets also included sugars and red meat, while unsaturated fats scored higher in low-cost diets. Each one-point increase in the EAT-Lancet score was associated with a BRL$0.38 reduction in cost, driven by lower costs in the Limited component, especially among the lowest-income strata (reductions of BRL$1.58 and BRL$1.55 in the lowest income and middle income tertiles, respectively). However, higher scores for emphasized foods increased costs (BRL$0.89) in the lowest tertile.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher EAT-Lancet scores were associated with reduced diet costs, likely influenced by the lower Limited component costs in low-income groups. Emphasized foods, however, tended to increase costs, particularly among the lowest-income group. These findings suggest that the role of diet composition plays a significant role in cost differences and underscore the challenges that low-income groups face in accessing affordable, healthy diets.

摘要

背景/目的:食品价格是影响食物选择的关键因素,对弱势群体而言尤为如此。旨在评估巴西不同人口群体中饮食成本与质量(以EAT-柳叶刀饮食评分衡量)之间的关联。

方法

利用2017/18年家庭预算调查的数据计算EAT-柳叶刀饮食评分,该评分由14个成分组成。评分范围为0(低依从性)至42(高依从性),包括重点成分(如蔬菜、水果、豆类)和受限成分(如红肉、糖、鸡蛋)。结果按人均收入、地理区域和居住地区进行分层,并使用针对高成本和低成本进行调整的线性回归进行比较。此外,针对总人口和收入三分位数分析了EAT-柳叶刀饮食评分(及其重点和受限成分)与饮食成本(连续变量)之间的关联。

结果

EAT-柳叶刀饮食评分的平均值为18.65分(范围:7至25),平均饮食成本为0.65巴西雷亚尔/100千卡。低成本饮食和高成本饮食的总分无显著差异。然而,低成本饮食中受限摄入量更为明显,而高成本饮食的特点是水果、蔬菜和海鲜等重点食物。高成本饮食还包括糖和红肉,而低成本饮食中不饱和脂肪得分更高。EAT-柳叶刀饮食评分每增加1分,成本降低0.38巴西雷亚尔,这是由受限成分成本降低所致,尤其是在最低收入阶层中(最低收入和中等收入三分位数分别降低1.58巴西雷亚尔和1.55巴西雷亚尔)。然而,在最低三分位数中,重点食物得分较高会增加成本(0.89巴西雷亚尔)。

结论

较高的EAT-柳叶刀饮食评分与饮食成本降低相关,这可能受到低收入群体中受限成分成本较低的影响。然而,重点食物往往会增加成本,尤其是在最低收入群体中。这些发现表明饮食组成在成本差异中起着重要作用,并凸显了低收入群体在获取价格合理的健康饮食方面面临的挑战。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8435/11767983/e78f4b275b31/nutrients-17-00289-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验