Suppr超能文献

1997 - 2015年中国遵循EAT - 柳叶刀饮食的健康结果、环境影响及饮食成本:一项健康与营养调查

Health outcomes, environmental impacts, and diet costs of adherence to the EAT-Lancet Diet in China in 1997-2015: a health and nutrition survey.

作者信息

Cai Hongyi, Talsma Elise F, Chang Zhiyao, Wen Xin, Fan Shenggen, Van't Veer Pieter, Biesbroek Sander

机构信息

Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands; Academy of Global Food Economics and Policy, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China; College of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.

Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Lancet Planet Health. 2024 Dec;8(12):e1030-e1042. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00285-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2019, the EAT-Lancet Commission proposed a global reference dietary pattern. Although research on the EAT-Lancet reference diet and its associations with mortality, cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, dietary environmental impacts, and cost of diets is increasing, studies done in low-income and middle-income countries remain scarce. This study aimed to assess the health outcomes, environmental impacts, and dietary costs of adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet in China.

METHODS

In this health and nutrition survey study, 16 029 participants from the China Health and Nutrition Survey cohort (1997-2015) were included at baseline. All-cause mortality was reported by family members and risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes was self-reported. 3-day 24 h recall was used to assess adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet (Eat-Lancet Diet Index [ELDI]), diet-related environmental impacts (greenhouse-gas emissions [GHGE]), total water use (TWU), land use, and dietary costs in each survey round. Hazard ratios (HRs) for the ELDI-score were obtained by Cox models with time-varying covariates, adjusted for potential confounders. Multilevel mixed-effects linear regression was used to assess the association of environmental impacts and dietary costs to the ELDI score.

FINDINGS

During a median follow-up of 9·86 years, 803 new cases of incident type 2 diabetes, 563 new cases of cardiovascular disease, and 908 cases of all-cause mortality were recorded. At baseline, the ELDI score ranged from 9·4 points to 110·8 points on a scale of 0 to 140, with a mean of 55·3 points (SD 11·8). With each SD increase in the ELDI score, there was an 8% decreased risk of mortality (95% CI 2·2-14·1), a 16·1% decreased risk of cardiovascular disease (9·2-20·3), and a 25·3% decreased risk of type 2 diabetes (19·5- 28·4). Each SD increase in the index was associated with a decrease of 2·2% (95% CI -2·6 to -1·8) in GHGE, 2·3% (-2·6 to -2·0) in land use, no association with TWU, but an increase in diet costs of 3·3% (2·8 to 3·8).

INTERPRETATION

High adherence to the ELDI was associated with a lower risk of mortality, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes. However, the association with diet-related GHGE and land use was modest, and adherence was also linked to higher diet costs. The study advocates for the integration of sustainable indicators into future Chinese dietary guidelines. Additionally, policy measures such as agricultural subsidies on fruit and vegetable and carbon taxes on red meat are recommended to increase affordability, reduce environmental impact, and enhance the overall sustainability of dietary practices in China.

FUNDING

The China Scholarship Council and the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

摘要

背景

2019年,《柳叶刀-饮食委员会》提出了一种全球参考饮食模式。尽管关于《柳叶刀》参考饮食及其与死亡率、心血管疾病、2型糖尿病、饮食环境影响和饮食成本之间关联的研究日益增多,但在低收入和中等收入国家开展的研究仍然较少。本研究旨在评估在中国遵循《柳叶刀》参考饮食对健康结局、环境影响和饮食成本的影响。

方法

在这项健康与营养调查研究中,纳入了中国健康与营养调查队列(1997 - 2015年)的16029名参与者作为基线。全因死亡率由家庭成员报告,心血管疾病和2型糖尿病风险由参与者自我报告。每轮调查采用3天24小时回顾法评估对《柳叶刀》参考饮食的依从性(《柳叶刀》饮食指数[ELDI])、饮食相关环境影响(温室气体排放[GHGE])、总用水量(TWU)、土地利用和饮食成本。ELDI得分的风险比(HRs)通过具有时变协变量的Cox模型获得,并对潜在混杂因素进行了调整。采用多水平混合效应线性回归评估环境影响和饮食成本与ELDI得分之间的关联。

结果

在中位随访9.86年期间,记录到803例2型糖尿病新发病例、563例心血管疾病新发病例和908例全因死亡病例。基线时,ELDI得分在0至140分的范围内为9.4分至110.8分,平均为55.3分(标准差11.8)。ELDI得分每增加1个标准差,死亡风险降低8%(95%置信区间2.2 - 14.1),心血管疾病风险降低16.1%(9.2 - 20.3),2型糖尿病风险降低25.3%(19.5 - 28.4)。该指数每增加1个标准差,GHGE降低2.2%(95%置信区间 - 2.6至 - 1.8),土地利用降低2.3%( - 2.6至 - 2.0),与TWU无关联,但饮食成本增加3.3%(2.8至3.8)。

解读

对ELDI的高依从性与较低的死亡风险、心血管疾病风险和2型糖尿病风险相关。然而,与饮食相关的GHGE和土地利用的关联较小,且依从性还与较高的饮食成本相关。该研究主张将可持续指标纳入未来的中国饮食指南。此外,建议采取诸如对水果和蔬菜的农业补贴以及对红肉征收碳税等政策措施,以提高可承受性、减少环境影响并增强中国饮食实践的整体可持续性。

资金来源

中国国家留学基金管理委员会和中国国家自然科学基金。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验