Suppr超能文献

事故责任

Accident liability.

作者信息

Kuné J B

出版信息

Br J Ind Med. 1985 May;42(5):336-40.

Abstract

The idea of accident proneness, which originated in the early 1900s, has proved to be ineffectual as an operational concept. Discrete econometric methods may be useful to find out which factors are at work in the process that leads to accidents and whether there are individuals who are more liable to accidents than others.

摘要

事故倾向的概念起源于20世纪初,事实证明,作为一个操作性概念,它是无效的。离散计量经济学方法可能有助于找出在导致事故的过程中起作用的因素,以及是否存在比其他人更容易发生事故的个体。

相似文献

1
Accident liability.事故责任
Br J Ind Med. 1985 May;42(5):336-40.
2
Accident proneness: science or non-science?
Int J Health Serv. 1981;11(2):175-90. doi: 10.2190/4EKV-J0HB-DE0P-2ERW.
3
[The human factor in accidents].[事故中的人为因素]
Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 1994 Sep;45(3):249-73.
10
Rational decisions and occupational health: a critical view.理性决策与职业健康:批判性观点
Int J Health Serv. 1984;14(3):433-45. doi: 10.2190/TLHH-4UA5-Y6TE-9CQM.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验