Subramanian Tejas, Shahi Pratyush, Hirase Takashi, Korsun Maximilian, Zhang Joshua, Kim Eric, Kwas Cole, Kaidi Austin C, Boddapati Venkat, Song Junho, Asada Tomoyuki, Mai Eric, Simon Chad, Araghi Kasra, Amen Troy B, Vaishnav Avani, Tuma Olivia, Zhao Eric, Singh Nishtha, Allen Myles, Bay Annika, Sheha Evan, Lovecchio Francis C, Dowdell James E, Qureshi Sheeraz A, Iyer Sravisht
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Global Spine J. 2025 Jan 25:21925682251314380. doi: 10.1177/21925682251314380.
Retrospective cohort study.
Frailty is defined as a state of minimal "physiologic reserve." The modified 5 factor frailty index (mFI-5) is a recently proposed metric for assessing frailty and has been previously studied as a predictor of morbidity and mortality. However, its utility in predicting postoperative patient reported outcomes (PROMs) and return to activities remains understudied.
This is a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing 1 or 2 level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion queried from a prospectively maintained multi-surgeon registry. Comorbidities including hypertension, congestive heart failure, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and functional status were utilized to calculate the mFI-5. Patients were separated into 3 cohorts, "non-frail," "moderately frail" or "severely frail" based on their mFI-5. Patient outcomes were compared between the cohorts.
392 patients were included of which 227 patients were non-frail, 134 were moderately frail, and 31 were severely frail. Frail patients had longer operative time ( = 0.002), greater estimated blood loss ( = 0.038). Despite similar preoperative PROMs, at a longer term follow up, frail patients also had worse PROM scores for ODI ( = 0.009), VAS-back ( = 0.028), and VAS-leg ( = 0.004). Frail patients had worse preoperative ( = 0.017) and postoperative ( < 0.001) SF-12 PCS. At 1-year, frail patients had lower rates of fusion ( = 0.002). Frail patients also demonstrated lower rates of returning to work ( = 0.018), returning to driving ( = 0.027), and discontinuation of narcotics ( = 0.004).
Frail patients as measured by the mFI-5 index demonstrated worse postoperative outcomes following 1 or 2 level MI-TLIF. Careful patient selection and preoperative optimization may be especially important in frail patients.
回顾性队列研究。
衰弱被定义为一种最小“生理储备”状态。改良的5因素衰弱指数(mFI-5)是最近提出的一种评估衰弱的指标,此前已被研究作为发病率和死亡率的预测指标。然而,其在预测术后患者报告结局(PROMs)和恢复活动方面的效用仍未得到充分研究。
这是一项对接受1或2节段微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术患者的回顾性队列研究,数据来自前瞻性维护的多外科医生登记处。利用包括高血压、充血性心力衰竭、糖尿病、慢性阻塞性肺疾病和功能状态在内的合并症来计算mFI-5。根据mFI-5将患者分为3组:“非衰弱”、“中度衰弱”或“重度衰弱”。比较各组患者的结局。
纳入392例患者,其中227例非衰弱,134例中度衰弱,31例重度衰弱。衰弱患者手术时间更长(P = 0.002),估计失血量更大(P = 0.038)。尽管术前PROMs相似,但在长期随访中,衰弱患者的ODI(P = 0.009)、VAS背部(P = 0.028)和VAS腿部(P = 0.004)的PROM评分也更差。衰弱患者术前(P = 0.017)和术后(P < 0.001)的SF-12 PCS更差。在1年时,衰弱患者的融合率更低(P = 0.002)。衰弱患者恢复工作(P = 0.018)、恢复驾驶(P = 0.027)和停用麻醉剂(P = 0.004)的比例也更低。
通过mFI-5指数测量的衰弱患者在1或2节段MI-TLIF术后结局更差。在衰弱患者中,仔细的患者选择和术前优化可能尤为重要。