• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单节段腰椎前路椎间融合术联合或不联合后路内固定术后功能恢复的时间进程:一项单机构回顾性研究。

Time Course of Functional Recovery Following Single-Level Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with and Without Posterior Instrumentation: A Retrospective Single-Institution Study.

作者信息

Subramanian Tejas, Owusu-Sarpong Stephane, Kush Sophie, Ehrlich Adin M, Asada Tomoyuki, Zhao Eric R, Araghi Kasra, Hirase Takashi, Kaidi Austin C, Kazarian Gregory S, Musharbash Farah, Colón Luis Felipe, Lui Adrian T H, Durbas Atahan, Tuma Olivia C, Shahi Pratyush, Morse Kyle W, Lovecchio Francis C, Sheha Evan D, Dowdell James E, Kim Han Jo, Qureshi Sheeraz A, Iyer Sravisht

机构信息

Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA.

Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Ave, New York, NY 10021, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 20;14(13):4397. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134397.

DOI:10.3390/jcm14134397
PMID:40648771
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12249593/
Abstract

: While anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is a well-established treatment for degenerative lumbar spine pathology, the timing and pace of postoperative recovery remain poorly defined. Understanding these temporal trends is clinically important for setting patient expectations and optimizing postoperative care. : This retrospective single-institution study evaluated functional recovery in patients undergoing primary, single-level stand-alone (SA) ALIF, or with percutaneous posterior instrumentation (PI). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, and the SF-12 Physical Component Score (PCS), were assessed preoperatively and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Achievement of minimum clinically important difference (MCID), global rating change (GRC), and return-to-activity milestones were also analyzed. : A total of 143 patients were included (90 SA; 53 PI). PROMs showed significant improvement through 1 year. VAS-back improved by 2 weeks, while ODI and SF12 PCS initially worsened but improved after 6 weeks. By 6 months, over half of the cohort achieved MCID, with continued gains through 1 year. Most patients returned to driving and work, and over 90% discontinued narcotics. Recovery trajectories were comparable between groups, despite early delays in the instrumented cohort. : These findings provide time-specific recovery benchmarks that can guide surgical decision-making, patient education, and expectations around functional milestones.

摘要

虽然腰椎前路椎间融合术(ALIF)是治疗退行性腰椎疾病的一种成熟方法,但术后恢复的时间和进程仍不明确。了解这些时间趋势对于设定患者期望和优化术后护理具有重要临床意义。

这项回顾性单机构研究评估了接受初次单节段独立(SA)ALIF或经皮后路内固定(PI)手术患者的功能恢复情况。术前以及术后2周、6周、3个月、6个月、1年和2年评估患者报告的结局指标(PROMs),包括奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数(ODI)、背部和腿部疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)以及SF-12身体成分评分(PCS)。还分析了最小临床重要差异(MCID)的达成情况、总体评分变化(GRC)以及恢复活动的里程碑。

共纳入143例患者(90例SA;53例PI)。PROMs在1年内显示出显著改善。VAS背部疼痛评分在术后2周改善,而ODI和SF12 PCS最初恶化,但在6周后改善。到6个月时,超过一半的队列达到MCID,并且在1年内持续改善。大多数患者恢复了驾驶和工作,超过90%的患者停用了麻醉药品。尽管器械组早期有延迟,但两组的恢复轨迹具有可比性。

这些发现提供了特定时间的恢复基准,可指导手术决策、患者教育以及围绕功能里程碑的期望设定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02ea/12249593/61dd04b1be90/jcm-14-04397-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02ea/12249593/23f08c25dcb5/jcm-14-04397-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02ea/12249593/5e88e779c10d/jcm-14-04397-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02ea/12249593/61dd04b1be90/jcm-14-04397-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02ea/12249593/23f08c25dcb5/jcm-14-04397-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02ea/12249593/5e88e779c10d/jcm-14-04397-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02ea/12249593/61dd04b1be90/jcm-14-04397-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Time Course of Functional Recovery Following Single-Level Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with and Without Posterior Instrumentation: A Retrospective Single-Institution Study.单节段腰椎前路椎间融合术联合或不联合后路内固定术后功能恢复的时间进程:一项单机构回顾性研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 20;14(13):4397. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134397.
2
A systematic review of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF).前路腰椎间融合术(ALIF)与后路腰椎间融合术(PLIF)、经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(TLIF)、经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(PLF)的系统评价。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Jun;32(6):1911-1926. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07567-x. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
3
Surgical Invasiveness, Hidden Blood Loss, and Outcomes of Two Endoscopic Lumbar Fusion Techniques for Degenerative Disease: A Comparative Study.两种内镜下腰椎融合技术治疗退行性疾病的手术侵袭性、隐匿性失血及疗效:一项比较研究
World Neurosurg. 2025 Jun 25:124208. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124208.
4
Evaluating the correlation and responsiveness of patient-reported pain with function and quality-of-life outcomes after spine surgery.评估脊柱手术后患者报告的疼痛与功能和生活质量结局的相关性和反应性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21 Suppl):S69-74. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef6de.
5
Examination of clinical and radiographic outcomes after lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective analysis of TLIF, MidLIF, and MIS-TLIF procedures.腰椎椎间融合术后临床及影像学结果的检查:经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术、腰椎中间椎体间融合术和微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的回顾性分析
J Neurosurg Spine. 2025 May 2;43(1):52-62. doi: 10.3171/2025.1.SPINE241286. Print 2025 Jul 1.
6
Does Preoperative Back Pain Impact Patient-reported Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Isthmic Spondylolisthesis?术前腰痛是否会影响微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗峡部裂性腰椎滑脱症患者的报告结局?
Clin Spine Surg. 2024 Jun 1;37(5):E179-E184. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001568. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
7
A pilot randomized control trial comparing posterior paramedian versus midline incisions for interbody fusions of the lumbar spine.一项比较腰椎椎间融合术经后正中旁切口与正中切口的前瞻性随机对照试验。
Spine J. 2025 Jul 11. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2025.07.009.
8
Does Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Reduce Mechanical Complication and Pseudarthrosis Rate at the Lumbosacral Junction in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery in Comparison to Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion?与后路腰椎椎间融合术相比,前路腰椎椎间融合术是否能降低成人脊柱畸形手术中腰骶部的机械并发症和假关节形成率?
Int J Spine Surg. 2025 Sep 2;19(4):409-417. doi: 10.14444/8774.
9
What Are the Recurrence Rates, Complications, and Functional Outcomes After Multiportal Arthroscopic Synovectomy for Patients With Knee Diffuse-type Tenosynovial Giant-cell Tumors?膝关节弥漫型腱鞘巨细胞瘤患者行多入路关节镜下滑膜切除术的复发率、并发症及功能结局如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1218-1229. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002934. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
10
Minimally invasive versus mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in managing low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与小切口经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗低度退变性腰椎滑脱症的比较。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Sep 12;166(1):365. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06231-7.

本文引用的文献

1
High Modified 5 Factor Frailty Index is Associated With Worse PROMs and Decreased Return to Activities After 1 or 2 Level MI-TLIF.高改良5因素衰弱指数与1或2节段腰椎微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MI-TLIF)后更差的患者报告结局量表(PROMs)以及活动恢复减少相关。
Global Spine J. 2025 Jan 25:21925682251314380. doi: 10.1177/21925682251314380.
2
Temporal Changes in PROMs Improvement and Recovery Kinetics Following Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy.经椎间孔内镜下腰椎间盘摘除术后患者报告结局量表改善情况及恢复动力学的时间变化
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2024 Dec 18. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005246.
3
Return to Work Following Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Percutaneous Posterior Pedicle Fixation: A Retrospective Analysis from Two Academic Centers in Germany.
经皮后路椎弓根固定的腰椎前路椎间融合术后重返工作岗位:来自德国两个学术中心的回顾性分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 23;13(18):5636. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185636.
4
Temporal Trends of Improvement After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后改善情况的时间趋势
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025 Jan 15;50(2):81-87. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005024. Epub 2024 May 6.
5
Long-term comparison of anterior (ALIF) versus transforaminal (TLIF) lumbar interbody fusion: a propensity score-matched register-based study.前路(ALIF)与经椎间孔(TLIF)腰椎体间融合术的长期比较:倾向评分匹配的基于登记的研究。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Mar;33(3):1109-1119. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08060-1. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
6
The Case for Operative Efficiency in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Impact of Operative Time on Complications, Length of Stay, Alignment, Fusion Rates, and Patient-Reported Outcomes.成人脊柱畸形手术中提高手术效率的理由:手术时间对并发症、住院时间、矫形、融合率和患者报告结果的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2024 Mar 1;49(5):313-320. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004873. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
7
Using Artificial Intelligence to Answer Common Patient-Focused Questions in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery.利用人工智能回答微创脊柱手术中常见的以患者为中心的问题。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023 Oct 18;105(20):1649-1653. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.23.00043. Epub 2023 May 29.
8
Clinical Improvement After Lumbar Fusion: Using PROMIS to Assess Recovery Kinetics.腰椎融合术后的临床改善:使用 PROMIS 评估恢复动力学。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2024 May 1;49(9):601-608. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004709. Epub 2023 May 8.
9
Comparison of radiographic and clinical outcomes between ALIF, OLIF, and TLIF over 2-year follow-up: a comparative study.后路椎间融合术、侧方椎间融合术和经椎间孔椎间融合术 2 年随访的影像学和临床结果比较:一项对照研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Mar 2;18(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03652-5.
10
Patient-reported outcome measures in spine surgery: A systematic review.脊柱手术中患者报告的结局指标:一项系统评价。
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2022 Oct-Dec;13(4):378-389. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_101_22. Epub 2022 Dec 7.