Gabbai Daniel, Jacoby Chen, Gilboa Itamar, Maslovitz Sharon, Yogev Yariv, Attali Emmanuel
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lis Hospital for Women's Health, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Jan 25. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07911-6.
This study aimed to assess the impact of absorbable subcutaneous staples for skin closure in cesarean delivery (CD) on maternal morbidity.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary university-affiliated medical center between January 2011 and April 2022. In 2020, a new technique involving absorbable subcutaneous staples for skin closure in CD was introduced. We compared surgical outcomes among three groups: non-absorbable staples, absorbable subcutaneous staples, and absorbable subcutaneous sutures. Data were compared between the three groups and demographic, obstetric, and surgical characteristics were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis.
During the study period, 31,660 CDs were performed in our center. The data of 31,419 CDs were available for analysis. Absorbable subcutaneous staples were associated with a significantly shorter surgery time in comparison to non-absorbable staples and sutures (52 min vs 53 min vs 60 min, p < 0.001). No differences were found in rates of wound infections or any surgical site surgery in the 45 days following CD. In a multivariate analysis: the use of absorbable subcutaneous staples was associated with a significantly lower risk for prolonged hospitalization > 5 days (OR 0.6, p < 0.001) and re-admission within 45 days (OR 0.8, p = 0.04).
The use of absorbable subcutaneous staples for skin closure during CD is associated with shorter surgery times and a lower risk of prolonged hospitalization and readmission within 45 days.
本研究旨在评估剖宫产术中使用可吸收皮下吻合器进行皮肤缝合对产妇发病率的影响。
在一所单一的三级大学附属医院医疗中心于2011年1月至2022年4月进行了一项回顾性队列研究。2020年,引入了一种在剖宫产术中使用可吸收皮下吻合器进行皮肤缝合的新技术。我们比较了三组的手术结果:不可吸收吻合器组、可吸收皮下吻合器组和可吸收皮下缝线组。对三组数据进行比较,并使用单因素和多因素分析对人口统计学、产科和手术特征进行分析。
在研究期间,我们中心共进行了31660例剖宫产手术。其中31419例剖宫产手术的数据可供分析。与不可吸收吻合器和缝线相比,可吸收皮下吻合器的手术时间明显更短(分别为52分钟、53分钟和60分钟,p<0.001)。剖宫产术后45天内的伤口感染率或任何手术部位手术率均无差异。在多因素分析中:使用可吸收皮下吻合器与延长住院时间>5天的风险显著降低相关(OR 0.6,p<0.001)以及45天内再次入院的风险降低相关(OR 0.8,p=0.04)。
剖宫产术中使用可吸收皮下吻合器进行皮肤缝合与更短的手术时间以及降低45天内延长住院时间和再次入院的风险相关。