Jalilian Banafsheh, Rostami Noredin, Heydari Mehdi, Kohzadian Mehrdad, Valkó Orsolya, Omidipour Reza
Department of Range and Watershed Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran.
Ilam Natural Resources Office, Ilam, Iran.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 25;15(1):3275. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83095-y.
Soil seed bank (SSB) is valuable reserves of seeds hidden in the soil and are especially important for the preservation and establishment of vegetation under adverse environmental conditions. However, there is a lack of knowledge on the effects of restoration measures on SSB, especially in arid ecosystems. Here, we assess the impacts of oil mulching (1 and 3 years after mulching) and plantations (15-year-old) on the diversity and composition of SSB and aboveground vegetation (AGV) in comparison with those in non-restored areas (i.e., control). Based on the results, species richness was poor in the studied area (36 species belonging to 16 families), with a lower contribution of SSB than of AGV (11 and 34 species, respectively). The largest number of exclusive species was observed in the planted treatment for both SSB and AGV (4 and 5 species, respectively), while the lowest was found in the 1-yr mulching treatment. The mean comparison of the diversity indices revealed that the highest values occurred in the plantation and 3-yr-mulching plots. The seed density in the plantation area was significantly greater (4145 ± 694 seeds/m) than that in the other areas (3-yr-mulching > 1-yr-mulching > control treatments (145 ± 53, 65 ± 28, and 43 ± 22, respectively). The results of the DCA showed that the plantation treatment was completely separated from the other treatments in terms of the plant composition of the AGV, and the treatment closest to that area was 3-yr mulching, which indicates the positive effect of time since mulching on plant composition. The results of this study suggest that there is a trade-off between the short-term and medium-term effects of oil mulching, such that in the early years, oil mulching has a negative effect on the AGV and SSB, but its positive effects increase with time since mulching. It can be concluded that mulching, along with afforestation, creates a favorable microclimate and improves the diversity and composition of AGV and SSB.
土壤种子库(SSB)是隐藏在土壤中的宝贵种子储备,对于在不利环境条件下植被的保存和建立尤为重要。然而,人们对恢复措施对土壤种子库的影响缺乏了解,尤其是在干旱生态系统中。在此,我们评估了油膜覆盖(覆盖后1年和3年)和人工林(15年树龄)对土壤种子库和地上植被(AGV)的多样性和组成的影响,并与未恢复区域(即对照)进行比较。基于这些结果,研究区域的物种丰富度较低(36种,分属于16科),土壤种子库的贡献低于地上植被(分别为11种和34种)。在人工林处理中,土壤种子库和地上植被的特有物种数量最多(分别为4种和5种),而在1年覆盖处理中最少。多样性指数的均值比较表明,最高值出现在人工林和3年覆盖地块。人工林区域的种子密度显著高于其他区域(4145±694粒/平方米),其他区域为3年覆盖>1年覆盖>对照处理(分别为145±53、65±28和43±22粒/平方米)。去趋势对应分析(DCA)结果表明,就地上植被的植物组成而言,人工林处理与其他处理完全分离,最接近该区域的处理是3年覆盖,这表明覆盖时间对植物组成有积极影响。本研究结果表明,油膜覆盖的短期和中期效应之间存在权衡,即在早期,油膜覆盖对地上植被和土壤种子库有负面影响,但其积极影响随覆盖时间的增加而增加。可以得出结论,覆盖与造林一起,创造了有利的小气候,改善了地上植被和土壤种子库的多样性和组成。