• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高效薄层色谱-umu联用非靶向分析——一种适用于饮用水分析的灵敏遗传毒性筛选工具。

High-performance thin-layer chromatography-umu combined with nontarget analysis-a sensitive genotoxicity screening tool applicable for potable water analysis.

作者信息

Flörs Markus, Schertzinger Gerhard, Pannekens Helena, Seitz Wolfram, Zwiener Christian, Winzenbacher Rudi

机构信息

Zweckverband Landeswasserversorgung, Laboratory for Operation Control and Research, Langenau, Germany.

Department of Geoscience, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Environ Toxicol Chem. 2025 Mar 1;44(3):662-673. doi: 10.1093/etojnl/vgae076.

DOI:10.1093/etojnl/vgae076
PMID:39864435
Abstract

Monitoring of genotoxic chemicals released into the water cycle or formed through transformation processes is critical to prevent harm to human health. The development of the high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC)-umu bioassay combines sample separation and detection of genotoxic substances in the low ng/L concentration range. In this study, raw, process, and drinking water samples from 11 different waterworks in Germany were analyzed using the HPTLC-umu. A genotoxic response was detected in three out of 42 samples (one raw water sample and two drinking water samples). Genotoxicity testing using the micronucleus and p53-CALUX (chemical activated luciferase gene expression) assays revealed genotoxic effects for the raw water sample and one of the drinking water samples. Fortunately, only minor genotoxic effects could be detected in the two drinking water samples, with estimated 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide equivalency concentrations of 0.12 ng/L and 0.17 ng/L, respectively. After extraction of the genotoxic zones from HPTLC plates, identification attempts were conducted with nontarget analysis (NTA). A prioritization approach based on chlorine and bromine isotope pattern revealed several halogenated features for both drinking water samples. These tentatively identified substances were previously reported in the literature as possible carcinogens. Although the detected features could not be conclusively identified, the presence of halogenated features in the genotoxic effective zone of the HPTLC-umu assay strongly suggests that the chlorine disinfection process in both waterworks was responsible for the formation of the genotoxic substances in the drinking water samples. These findings emphasize that the HPTLC-umu in combination with additional genotoxicity assays and NTA can be used to evaluate even relatively clean samples, such as drinking water.

摘要

监测释放到水循环中或通过转化过程形成的基因毒性化学物质对于预防对人类健康的危害至关重要。高性能薄层色谱(HPTLC)-umu生物测定法的发展结合了样品分离和低ng/L浓度范围内基因毒性物质的检测。在本研究中,使用HPTLC-umu对德国11个不同水厂的原水、处理水和饮用水样本进行了分析。在42个样本中有3个检测到了基因毒性反应(1个原水样本和2个饮用水样本)。使用微核和p53-CALUX(化学激活荧光素酶基因表达)测定法进行的基因毒性测试显示,原水样本和其中一个饮用水样本存在基因毒性效应。幸运的是,在这两个饮用水样本中仅检测到轻微的基因毒性效应,估计4-硝基喹啉-N-氧化物等效浓度分别为0.12 ng/L和0.17 ng/L。从HPTLC板上提取基因毒性区域后,尝试用非目标分析(NTA)进行鉴定。基于氯和溴同位素模式的优先排序方法揭示了两个饮用水样本中的几种卤代特征。这些初步鉴定的物质在文献中先前被报道为可能的致癌物。尽管检测到的特征无法最终确定,但HPTLC-umu测定法的基因毒性有效区域中卤代特征的存在强烈表明,两个水厂的氯消毒过程是饮用水样本中基因毒性物质形成的原因。这些发现强调,HPTLC-umu与其他基因毒性测定法和NTA相结合可用于评估甚至相对清洁的样本,如饮用水。

相似文献

1
High-performance thin-layer chromatography-umu combined with nontarget analysis-a sensitive genotoxicity screening tool applicable for potable water analysis.高效薄层色谱-umu联用非靶向分析——一种适用于饮用水分析的灵敏遗传毒性筛选工具。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2025 Mar 1;44(3):662-673. doi: 10.1093/etojnl/vgae076.
2
Completely automated short-term genotoxicity testing for the assessment of chemicals and characterisation of contaminated soils and waste waters.用于化学品评估以及污染土壤和废水特性描述的全自动短期遗传毒性测试。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2008 May;15(3):211-7. doi: 10.1065/espr2007.12.462.
3
Genotoxicity of drinking water treated with different disinfectants and effects of disinfection conditions detected by umu-test.用umu试验检测不同消毒剂处理的饮用水的遗传毒性及消毒条件的影响。
J Environ Sci (China). 2017 Jun;56:36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2016.07.016. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
4
Evaluation of genotoxic effects of surface waters using a battery of bioassays indicating different mode of action.采用一系列指示不同作用模式的生物测定法评估地表水的遗传毒性效应。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2016 Nov;133:448-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.07.022. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
5
Evaluation of genotoxic effects caused by extracts of chlorinated drinking water using a combination of three different bioassays.评价三种不同生物检测方法联用检测氯化饮用水提取物的遗传毒性效应。
J Hazard Mater. 2015 Oct 15;296:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.04.047. Epub 2015 Apr 18.
6
Comparative cytotoxic and genotoxic potential of 13 drinking water disinfection by-products using a microplate-based cytotoxicity assay and a developed SOS/umu assay.使用基于微孔板的细胞毒性测定法和改进的SOS/umu测定法对13种饮用水消毒副产物的细胞毒性和遗传毒性潜力进行比较
Mutagenesis. 2016 Jan;31(1):35-41. doi: 10.1093/mutage/gev053. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
7
Double-endpoint Genotoxicity Quantification and PAHs Characterization of Drinking Water Source alongside Polluted Yinghe River with High Tumor Mortality.饮用水源与高肿瘤死亡率的受污染营河的双端点遗传毒性定量和多环芳烃特征。
Curr Med Sci. 2021 Apr;41(2):189-198. doi: 10.1007/s11596-021-2336-z. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
8
Coupling of In Vitro Bioassays with Planar Chromatography in Effect-Directed Analysis.体外生物测定与平面色谱法在效应导向分析中的联用
Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2017;157:187-224. doi: 10.1007/10_2016_16.
9
Coupling high-performance thin-layer chromatography with a battery of cell-based assays reveals bioactive components in wastewater and landfill leachates.将高效薄层色谱法与一系列基于细胞的分析方法相结合,揭示了废水和垃圾渗滤液中的生物活性成分。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021 May;214:112092. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112092. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
10
Incorporation of Metabolic Activation in the HPTLC-SOS-Umu-C Bioassay to Detect Low Levels of Genotoxic Chemicals in Food Contact Materials.将代谢活化纳入高效薄层色谱- SOS - Umu - C生物测定法以检测食品接触材料中的低水平遗传毒性化学物质。
Toxics. 2022 Aug 27;10(9):501. doi: 10.3390/toxics10090501.