Mortensen Anne Helene, Nåden Dagfinn, Karterud Dag, Lohne Vibeke
Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, OsloMet-Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Dec 29;8:100287. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100287. eCollection 2025 Jun.
Nudging involves deliberately changing the environment or context to induce better choices. Several studies consider such methods unethical manipulation that threatens the principles of informed consent and autonomy, which are particularly vital in healthcare. Others argue that nudging respects personal freedom because it is not in conflict with the person's explicit values or choices, beneficial, and easy to resist. Additionally, studies argue that such strategies are legitimate as they can prevent more intrusive forms of paternalism. Given the increasing prevalence of soft paternalism through nudging, there is a need to examine its use in healthcare.
This study explored the phenomenon of nudging in a nursing home context.
A qualitative interpretive design informed by Gadamer's hermeneutics was employed.
Three distinct nursing home units in Norway, including long-term, dementia, and rehabilitation units. The study was conducted between December 7. 2019 and July 2. 2020.
Individuals involved in the units during the observation period.
Seven to eight weeks of observations, followed by interviews with caregivers (nurses and auxiliary nurses), two occupational therapists, and two physiotherapists.
The results suggest that nudging in this context can be understood across three themes: modification of physical surroundings, information and interaction, and ambiguous interventions.
Nudging is being used in nursing homes to guide residents' choices and behaviors to foster their well-being and uphold social norms. However, caregivers are also navigating the use of diverse forms of influence, including subtle nudging and assertive persuasion, and must consider complex factors.
REK - Regional ethics committee case number 175774Sikt - Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research case number 248550.
Experienced caregivers in nursing homes effectively use nudging to guide care routines, resulting in efficient care and better interactions.
助推涉及故意改变环境或情境以促使做出更好的选择。一些研究认为此类方法是不道德的操纵,威胁到知情同意和自主权原则,而这在医疗保健中尤为重要。另一些人则认为助推尊重个人自由,因为它与个人明确的价值观或选择不冲突,有益且易于抵制。此外,研究认为此类策略是合理的,因为它们可以防止更具侵入性的家长式作风形式。鉴于通过助推实现的软家长式作风日益普遍,有必要审视其在医疗保健中的应用。
本研究探讨了养老院环境中的助推现象。
采用了受伽达默尔诠释学启发的定性解释性设计。
挪威三个不同的养老院单元,包括长期护理单元、痴呆症护理单元和康复单元。该研究于2019年12月7日至2020年7月2日进行。
观察期内在这些单元工作的人员。
进行七到八周的观察,随后对护理人员(护士和助理护士)、两名职业治疗师和两名物理治疗师进行访谈。
结果表明,在这种背景下的助推可以通过三个主题来理解:物理环境的改变、信息与互动以及模糊的干预措施。
养老院正在使用助推来引导居民的选择和行为,以促进他们的福祉并维护社会规范。然而,护理人员也在应对各种影响形式的使用,包括微妙的助推和坚定的劝说,并且必须考虑复杂的因素。
REK - 地区伦理委员会案例编号175774;Sikt - 挪威教育和研究共享服务机构案例编号248550。
养老院中有经验的护理人员有效地使用助推来指导护理流程,从而实现高效护理和更好的互动。