McCormick William F, Lomis Mitchell J, Cooper Christian B, Yeager Matthew, Tsavaris Nicholas J, Patch David
Orthopedic Surgery, University of Georgia, Athens, USA.
Orthopedic Surgery, AU/UGA Medical Partnership, Augusta, USA.
Cureus. 2024 Dec 26;16(12):e76425. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76425. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Introduction A subject of ongoing debate within the National Football League (NFL) community revolves around the comparative risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries on natural versus artificial turf field surfaces. There have been mixed results as to whether there is a difference in injury rates depending on the playing surface and what factors might play a role in affecting these rates. Methods This study aims to compare the incidence of in-game knee ligament tears in the NFL during the 2020-2023 seasons. Data was collected from publicly available resources to determine and classify specific injury characteristics such as ligament, injury date, location, and field surface type. Only in-game knee ligament tears, including those occurring in pre-season games, were included. Significance was determined using two-sample T-tests. Results Over the 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023 seasons, there were 149 ligament tears, with 58 occurring on natural turf (38.9%) and 91 occurring on artificial turf (61.1%). Over the course of the same four years, 1213 games were played, with 524 (43.2%) games on natural turf and 689 games on artificial turf (56.8%). Accounting for the number of games played on each surface, natural turf saw a rate of 0.111 knee ligament tears per game, while artificial turf saw 0.132 ligament tears per game. Conclusion Over the course of the study period, we determined that there was no significant difference between the rates of in-game knee ligament tears on natural and artificial turf playing surfaces. Our study shows that regardless of differences in composition and other playing surface features, there is ultimately no difference in the incidence of knee ligament tears. Playing surfaces should still be monitored and regulated, and the incidence of other injuries, such as concussions, as well as player preference, should be considered when considering the ideal surface.
引言
美国国家橄榄球联盟(NFL)社区内一个持续争论的话题围绕着天然草皮与人工草皮场地表面上前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤的相对风险。关于根据比赛场地表面不同,损伤率是否存在差异以及哪些因素可能影响这些比率,研究结果不一。
方法
本研究旨在比较2020 - 2023赛季NFL比赛中膝关节韧带撕裂的发生率。从公开可用资源收集数据,以确定并分类特定的损伤特征,如韧带、损伤日期、位置和场地表面类型。仅纳入比赛中发生的膝关节韧带撕裂,包括季前赛中发生的此类损伤。使用双样本T检验确定显著性。
结果
在2020、2021、2022和2023赛季期间,共发生149例韧带撕裂,其中58例发生在天然草皮上(38.9%),91例发生在人工草皮上(61.1%)。在同一四年期间,共进行了1213场比赛,其中524场(43.2%)在天然草皮上进行,689场在人工草皮上进行(56.8%)。考虑到每个场地表面进行的比赛场次,天然草皮上每场比赛膝关节韧带撕裂率为0.111,而人工草皮上每场比赛韧带撕裂率为0.132。
结论
在研究期间,我们确定在天然草皮和人工草皮比赛场地表面上,比赛中膝关节韧带撕裂率之间没有显著差异。我们的研究表明,无论组成和其他场地表面特征存在何种差异,膝关节韧带撕裂的发生率最终并无不同。仍应监测和规范比赛场地表面,并且在考虑理想场地表面时,应考虑其他损伤(如脑震荡)的发生率以及球员偏好。