IQVIA, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health, New York, New York, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jan;47(1):189-196. doi: 10.1177/0363546518808499. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
Biomechanical studies have shown that synthetic turf surfaces do not release cleats as readily as natural turf, and it has been hypothesized that concomitant increased loading on the foot contributes to the incidence of lower body injuries. This study evaluates this hypothesis from an epidemiologic perspective, examining whether the lower extremity injury rate in National Football League (NFL) games is greater on contemporary synthetic turfs as compared with natural surfaces.
Incidence of lower body injury is higher on synthetic turf than on natural turf among elite NFL athletes playing on modern-generation surfaces.
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Lower extremity injuries reported during 2012-2016 regular season games were included, with all 32 NFL teams reporting injuries under mandated, consistent data collection guidelines. Poisson models were used to construct crude and adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs) to estimate the influence of surface type on lower body injury groupings (all lower extremity, knee, ankle/foot) for any injury reported as causing a player to miss football participation as well as injuries resulting in ≥8 days missed. A secondary analysis was performed on noncontact/surface contact injuries.
Play on synthetic turf resulted in a 16% increase in lower extremity injuries per play than that on natural turf (IRR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.10-1.23). This association between synthetic turf and injury remained when injuries were restricted to those that resulted in ≥8 days missed, as well as when categorizations were narrowed to focus on distal injuries anatomically closer to the playing surface (knee, ankle/foot). The higher rate of injury on synthetic turf was notably stronger when injuries were restricted to noncontact/surface contact injuries (IRRs, 1.20-2.03; all statistically significant).
These results support the biomechanical mechanism hypothesized and add confidence to the conclusion that synthetic turf surfaces have a causal impact on lower extremity injury.
生物力学研究表明,合成草皮表面不像天然草皮那样容易释放钉鞋,因此有人假设,脚部的负荷增加会导致下半身受伤的发生率增加。本研究从流行病学的角度评估了这一假设,研究了在现代合成草皮上,美国国家橄榄球联盟(NFL)比赛中下肢损伤的发生率是否高于天然草皮。
在现代一代草皮上,与天然草皮相比,精英 NFL 运动员在合成草皮上的下半身损伤发生率更高。
队列研究;证据水平,3 级。
包括 2012-2016 赛季常规赛报告的下肢损伤,所有 32 支 NFL 球队均按照强制性的、一致的数据收集准则报告损伤。使用泊松模型构建了粗发生率比(IRR)和调整后的发生率比(IRR),以估计表面类型对上半身损伤(所有下肢、膝盖、脚踝/脚)的影响,报告任何导致球员错过足球比赛的损伤以及导致错过 8 天以上的损伤。对非接触/表面接触损伤进行了二次分析。
与天然草皮相比,在合成草皮上,每一次比赛都会导致下肢损伤增加 16%(IRR,1.16;95%CI,1.10-1.23)。当将损伤限制在导致错过 8 天以上的损伤时,以及当将分类缩小到更关注解剖上更接近比赛表面的远端损伤(膝盖、脚踝/脚)时,这种与合成草皮和损伤之间的关联仍然存在。当将损伤限制在非接触/表面接触损伤时,合成草皮上更高的损伤率更为明显(IRR,1.20-2.03;均有统计学意义)。
这些结果支持了假设的生物力学机制,并为合成草皮表面对下肢损伤有因果影响的结论提供了更多信心。