Szücs Anna, Lee V Vien, Goldsmith Laurie J, Ong Alicia H, Hart Tim J, Loh Victor W K, Lazarus Monica, Leong Choon Kit, Lee Vivien M E, Leong Foon Leng, Young Doris, Maier Andrea B, Valderas Jose M
Department of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore, Singapore.
Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2025 Jan 3;54:101280. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101280. eCollection 2025 Jan.
Little is known about the practices and resources employed by general practitioners (GPs) in Singapore to manage late-life depression. As the country is stepping up its efforts to promote collaborative care across community mental health and geriatric care, understanding GPs' current practices when managing late-life depression appears timely.
This qualitative descriptive study explored the perspectives on late-life depression of 28 private GPs practicing in Singapore through online semi-structured group and individual interviews. GPs were purposively sampled across age, gender, and ethnicity. Analysis followed a reflexive thematic approach and focused on physician- and system-related factors.
Clinical instinct, experience, and knowledge of appropriate resources for specific patients played an important role for GPs during late-life depression care. GPs paid particular attention to communicating with patients tactfully during initial assessments and diagnosis, although some GPs chose to be upfront with patients with whom they had already established rapport. Using non-English languages when communicating about depression could mitigate stigma in some cases but added confusion in others. GPs relied primarily on their own professional support network to manage late-life depression. Although GPs acknowledged the usefulness of public care services, they felt that collaborative care was hindered by a lack of efficient communication channels between providers and appropriate financial coverage to coordinate the frequently complex care of depressed older adults.
Current resources and practices to manage late-life depression vary greatly between private GPs in Singapore. This needs to be considered during ongoing reforms to achieve effective collaborative care.
This work was funded by the Division of Family Medicine Research Capabilities Building Budget under the project "Technology and Compassion: Improving Patient Outcomes Through Data Analytics and Patients' Voice in Primary Care" [NUHSRO/2022/049/NUSMed/DFM].
对于新加坡全科医生(GP)管理老年抑郁症所采用的做法和资源,人们了解甚少。随着该国加大力度促进社区心理健康和老年护理之间的协作式护理,了解全科医生在管理老年抑郁症时的当前做法显得很及时。
这项定性描述性研究通过在线半结构化小组访谈和个人访谈,探讨了新加坡28名私人全科医生对老年抑郁症的看法。全科医生按年龄、性别和种族进行了有目的的抽样。分析采用反思性主题方法,重点关注与医生和系统相关的因素。
临床直觉、经验以及对特定患者合适资源的了解,在全科医生护理老年抑郁症患者期间发挥了重要作用。全科医生在初次评估和诊断期间特别注意与患者进行巧妙沟通,不过一些全科医生选择对已经建立融洽关系的患者直言不讳。在谈论抑郁症时使用非英语语言在某些情况下可以减轻污名,但在其他情况下会增加困惑。全科医生主要依靠自己的专业支持网络来管理老年抑郁症。尽管全科医生承认公共护理服务有用,但他们认为,提供者之间缺乏有效的沟通渠道以及适当的财务覆盖范围,阻碍了协作式护理,难以协调抑郁症老年人频繁而复杂的护理。
新加坡私人全科医生管理老年抑郁症的当前资源和做法差异很大。在正在进行的改革以实现有效的协作式护理过程中,需要考虑这一点。
这项工作由家庭医学研究能力建设预算部门资助,项目为“技术与关爱:通过数据分析和初级护理中患者的声音改善患者结局”[NUHSRO/2022/049/NUSMed/DFM]。