Xiao ZhenKun, Wang Bing, Yang YiBo, Huang MingJia, Liu JianHua, Duan YongHong, Liu AiHua
Hengyang Key Laboratory of Hemorrhagic Cerebrovascular Disease, Department of Neurosurgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, 421000, Hunan, China.
Medical Teaching Experiment Center, Medical School, ShenZhen University, ShenZhen, China.
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Jan 28;48(1):91. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03208-7.
Patients with intracranial aneurysms (IA) undergoing endovascular treatment face varying risks and benefits when tirofiban is used for thromboprophylaxis during surgery. Currently, there is a lack of high-level evidence summarizing this information. This study aims to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tirofiban during endovascular treatment of IA. Relevant studies published before November 2024 were searched in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. The primary outcomes were intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), thrombosis, and thrombolysis. Secondary outcomes included any non-ICH bleeding events (NoICH-BE), ischemic stroke (IS), intraoperative rupture aneurysm(IRA), follow-up prognosis, and Raymond and Roy classification (RROC). Meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.3 and StataMP 64 to assess efficacy (thrombosis, IS, thrombolysis) and safety (ICH, NoICH-BE, IRA). A total of 33 studies involving 3,617 IA patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that after the use of tirofiban, the pooled risk (PR) for ICH was 2% ([95% CI, 1-3%]; P < 0.001), for NoICH-BE was 0% ([95% CI, 0-2%]; P > 0.05), for IRA was 2% ([95% CI, 1-3%]; P < 0.001), for thrombosis was 3% ([95% CI, 2-4%]; P < 0.001), for IS was 2% ([95% CI, 0-3%]; P < 0.001), for thrombolysis was 96% ([95% CI, 91-99%]; P < 0.001), for good prognosis (mRS 0-2) was 91% ([95% CI, 85-95%]; P < 0.001), and for RROC 1-2 was 93% ([95% CI, 90-96%]; P < 0.001). This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate that the use of tirofiban during endovascular treatment of IA is both feasible and safe.
接受血管内治疗的颅内动脉瘤(IA)患者在手术期间使用替罗非班进行血栓预防时面临不同的风险和益处。目前,缺乏总结这些信息的高级别证据。本研究旨在进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估替罗非班在IA血管内治疗中的疗效和安全性。在PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库数据库中检索了2024年11月之前发表的相关研究。主要结局为颅内出血(ICH)、血栓形成和溶栓。次要结局包括任何非ICH出血事件(NoICH-BE)、缺血性卒中(IS)、术中动脉瘤破裂(IRA)、随访预后以及Raymond和Roy分级(RROC)。使用Revman 5.3和StataMP 64进行荟萃分析,以评估疗效(血栓形成、IS、溶栓)和安全性(ICH、NoICH-BE、IRA)。共纳入33项研究,涉及3617例IA患者。荟萃分析显示,使用替罗非班后,ICH的合并风险(PR)为2%([95%CI,1-3%];P < 0.001),NoICH-BE为0%([95%CI,0-2%];P > 0.05),IRA为2%([95%CI,1-3%];P < 0.001),血栓形成为3%([95%CI,2-4%];P < 0.001),IS为2%([95%CI,0-3%];P < 0.001),溶栓为96%([95%CI,91-99%];P < 0.001),良好预后(mRS 0-2)为91%([95%CI,85-95%];P < 0.001),RROC 1-2为93%([95%CI,90-96%];P < 0.001)。这项系统评价和荟萃分析表明,替罗非班在IA血管内治疗中的应用是可行且安全的。