• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全科医生实施以患者为中心的护理干预措施的促进因素和障碍:一项系统评价方案

Facilitators and barriers in the implementation of patient-centred care interventions among general practitioners: a systematic review protocol.

作者信息

Li Wenhui, Su Min, Li Zhengrong, Fan Xiaojing

机构信息

School of Public Administration, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China.

School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Jan 27;23(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01277-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12961-024-01277-6
PMID:39871228
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11773932/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Challenges in the patient-provider relationship are prevalent, underscoring the importance of patient-centred care, which is respectful and responsive to patients' needs. General practitioners (GPs), also known as family doctors, serve as gatekeepers in primary care and are well positioned to deliver this type of care. However, effectively implementing patient-centred care remains a challenge. While behaviour change interventions have been developed to enhance patient-centred care in general practices, a comprehensive understanding of the facilitators and barriers to their implementation is lacking. This review aims to examine contextual factors of implementing interventions for patient-centred care by GPs. Implementation research analyses all aspects of application, including factors influencing it, processes involved and outcomes achieved within different contexts. The review will use the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR 2.0) to analyse influential factors and the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) to define interventions to promote behaviour change in patient-centred care.

METHODS

This systematic literature review will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search of five databases (Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science) will be conducted to identify barriers and facilitators for implementing interventions in promoting patient-centred care by GPs. The CFIR 2.0 framework will guide the categorization and synthesis of barriers and facilitators, while the BCW will be employed to define the interventions. Two independent reviewers will conduct study screening, data extraction, quality appraisal and data analysis. Any disagreements between the reviewers will be resolved through the involvement of additional reviewers.

DISCUSSION

This protocol outlines a systematic review utilizing an updated framework-based approach to identify and synthesize evidence on barriers and facilitators to implementing behaviour change interventions by GPs. The findings will provide insights into the effectiveness of these interventions in enhancing patient-centred care and will inform future research and clinical practice. This review will identify gaps and challenges in existing studies and propose strategies for the effective implementation of behavior change interventions among GPs. Additionally, it will inform clinical practice by refining behaviour change interventions to enhance the delivery of patient-centred care by GPs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO: CRD42023485014.

摘要

背景

医患关系中的挑战普遍存在,这凸显了以患者为中心的医疗服务的重要性,即以尊重和回应患者需求为核心。全科医生(GPs),也被称为家庭医生,是初级医疗服务的守门人,非常适合提供这种类型的医疗服务。然而,有效实施以患者为中心的医疗服务仍然是一项挑战。虽然已经开发了行为改变干预措施来加强全科医疗中的以患者为中心的医疗服务,但对于这些措施实施的促进因素和障碍仍缺乏全面的了解。本综述旨在研究全科医生实施以患者为中心的医疗服务干预措施的背景因素。实施研究分析应用的各个方面,包括影响因素、涉及的过程以及在不同背景下取得的成果。本综述将使用更新后的实施研究综合框架(CFIR 2.0)来分析影响因素,并使用行为改变轮(BCW)来定义促进以患者为中心的医疗服务中行为改变的干预措施。

方法

本系统文献综述将遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。将对五个数据库(Ovid MEDLINE、CINAHL、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆和科学网)进行全面检索,以确定全科医生实施促进以患者为中心的医疗服务干预措施的障碍和促进因素。CFIR 2.0框架将指导障碍和促进因素的分类和综合,而BCW将用于定义干预措施。两名独立的评审员将进行研究筛选、数据提取、质量评估和数据分析。评审员之间的任何分歧将通过额外评审员的参与来解决。

讨论

本方案概述了一项系统综述,采用基于更新框架的方法来识别和综合关于全科医生实施行为改变干预措施的障碍和促进因素的证据。研究结果将深入了解这些干预措施在加强以患者为中心的医疗服务方面的有效性,并为未来的研究和临床实践提供参考。本综述将识别现有研究中的差距和挑战,并提出在全科医生中有效实施行为改变干预措施的策略。此外,它将通过完善行为改变干预措施为临床实践提供参考,以加强全科医生提供以患者为中心的医疗服务。

试验注册

PROSPERO:CRD42023485014。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3520/11773932/40fa05960089/12961_2024_1277_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3520/11773932/40fa05960089/12961_2024_1277_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3520/11773932/40fa05960089/12961_2024_1277_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Facilitators and barriers in the implementation of patient-centred care interventions among general practitioners: a systematic review protocol.全科医生实施以患者为中心的护理干预措施的促进因素和障碍:一项系统评价方案
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Jan 27;23(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01277-6.
2
Screening for depression among Spanish-speaking patients in primary care settings within the USA: a scoping review protocol to inform clinical practices.在美国初级保健机构中对说西班牙语的患者进行抑郁症筛查:一项为临床实践提供信息的范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 18;15(6):e092378. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092378.
3
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
4
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
5
Strategies and Tools for Electronic Health Records and Physician Workflow Alignment: Protocol for a Scoping Review.电子健康记录与医生工作流程协调的策略和工具:一项范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 2;14:e60464. doi: 10.2196/60464.
6
The use of ultrasonography in the diagnosis and management of Acute Kidney Injury and other forms renal dysfunction in the paediatric population: Systematic review protocol.超声检查在儿科急性肾损伤及其他形式肾功能障碍的诊断和管理中的应用:系统评价方案
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 18;20(6):e0325549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325549. eCollection 2025.
7
Interventions to Maintain HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria Service Delivery During Public Health Emergencies in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Protocol for a Systematic Review.中低收入国家突发公共卫生事件期间维持艾滋病毒/艾滋病、结核病和疟疾服务提供的干预措施:系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jan 15;14:e64316. doi: 10.2196/64316.
8
Wood Waste Valorization and Classification Approaches: A systematic review.木材废料的增值与分类方法:一项系统综述
Open Res Eur. 2025 May 6;5:5. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.18862.1. eCollection 2025.
9
Interventions for central serous chorioretinopathy: a network meta-analysis.中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的干预措施:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 16;6(6):CD011841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011841.pub3.
10
Parents' experiences of psychotherapeutic support on the neonatal unit: A mixed methods systematic review to inform intervention development for a multicultural population.父母在新生儿病房接受心理治疗支持的经历:一项混合方法的系统评价,为多元文化人群的干预发展提供信息。
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 May;30(3):e13194. doi: 10.1111/nicc.13194. Epub 2024 Oct 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Patients' views on primary care multidisciplinary teams in Scotland: a mixed-methods evaluation.苏格兰患者对基层医疗多学科团队的看法:一项混合方法评估。
BJGP Open. 2024 Oct 29;8(3). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0200. Print 2024 Oct.
2
Development of a person-centred care approach for persons with chronic multimorbidity in general practice by means of participatory action research.通过参与式行动研究,为基层医疗中的慢性多病患者开发以患者为中心的护理方法。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Apr 16;25(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02364-x.
3
Common barriers and enablers to the use of non-drug interventions for managing common chronic conditions in primary care: an overview of reviews.
常见慢性病的初级保健中非药物干预措施使用的常见障碍和促进因素:系统评价概述。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Apr 6;25(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02321-8.
4
Economic evaluation of a multimorbidity patient centered care model implemented in the Chilean public health system.在智利公共卫生系统中实施的一种以多病种患者为中心的护理模式的经济评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 29;23(1):1041. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09970-y.
5
Digital undergraduate medical education and patient and carer involvement: a rapid systematic review of current practice.数字式本科医学教育和患者及照护者参与:当前实践的快速系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 May 16;23(1):335. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04218-z.
6
Implementation strategies for telemental health: a systematic review.远程心理健康实施策略的系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jan 25;23(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08993-1.
7
The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback.基于用户反馈的更新的实施研究综合框架。
Implement Sci. 2022 Oct 29;17(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0.
8
Barriers and facilitators to clinical behaviour change by primary care practitioners: a theory-informed systematic review of reviews using the Theoretical Domains Framework and Behaviour Change Wheel.基层医疗保健从业者临床行为改变的障碍和促进因素:使用理论领域框架和行为改变轮对综述的理论启发式系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 30;11(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02030-2.
9
Implementation Barriers and Experiences of Eligible Patients Who Failed to Enroll in Collaborative Care for Depression and Anxiety.符合条件的抑郁症和焦虑症患者未能入组参与协作式护理的实施障碍和经验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Feb;38(2):366-374. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07750-8. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
10
Barriers and facilitators of implementing interventions to improve appropriate antibiotic use in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.实施干预措施以改善中低收入国家合理使用抗生素的障碍和促进因素:基于实施研究综合框架的系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2022 May 12;17(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01209-4.