• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字素养如何影响老年人的健康状况?来自中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)数据的微观层面证据。

How does digital literacy affect the health status of senior citizens? Micro-level evidence from the CFPS data.

作者信息

Chen Xiaoyi, Wang Nian

机构信息

College of Digital Economics, Nanning University, Nanning, 530000, China.

China-ASEAN Institute of Statistics, Guangxi University of Finance and Economics, Mingxiu West Road 100, Nanning, 530003, China.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 27;25(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12314-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-12314-7
PMID:39871247
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11773774/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The popularization of the Internet and digital technology has called for higher digital literacy among citizens, especially the elderly. However, most existing studies didn't measure digital literacy at the micro level, and the impact mechanism has rarely been discussed. The purpose of this study is to clarify whether and how digital literacy affects the health status of senior citizens.

METHODS

The data used in this study are collected from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) from three periods: 2016, 2018, and 2020. The balanced panel data comprised 7836 samples, with 2612 samples per year. Based on the CFPS data, this study constructs a balanced panel and employs a two-way fixed-effects model for the estimation. The instrumental variable (IV) method is employed for tackling the endogenous problems. Next, the mediation effect model is applied to identify the influencing mechanism.

RESULTS

First, digital literacy can improve the health status of senior citizens. This result remains valid after introducing lagged explanatory variables and addressing the endogeneity issues. Second, social support acts as a partial mediator in the relationship between digital literacy and the health status of senior citizens. Third, the heterogeneity analysis reveals that the effect of digital literacy on the health status of senior citizens varies across age groups, urban-rural types, and education levels.

CONCLUSIONS

This study examines the impact of digital literacy on the health status of senior citizens at the micro-level and identifies the mediation mechanism. The results enhance our understanding of the positive effects of digitalization on aging society and offer useful insights for the government in formulating more targeted active aging strategies.

摘要

背景

互联网和数字技术的普及要求公民,尤其是老年人具备更高的数字素养。然而,大多数现有研究并未在微观层面衡量数字素养,且很少讨论其影响机制。本研究的目的是阐明数字素养是否以及如何影响老年人的健康状况。

方法

本研究使用的数据来自中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)的三个时期:2016年、2018年和2020年。平衡面板数据包含7836个样本,每年有2612个样本。基于CFPS数据,本研究构建了一个平衡面板,并采用双向固定效应模型进行估计。采用工具变量(IV)法解决内生性问题。接下来,应用中介效应模型来识别影响机制。

结果

第一,数字素养可以改善老年人的健康状况。在引入滞后解释变量并解决内生性问题后,这一结果仍然有效。第二,社会支持在数字素养与老年人健康状况之间的关系中起到部分中介作用。第三,异质性分析表明,数字素养对老年人健康状况的影响因年龄组、城乡类型和教育水平而异。

结论

本研究在微观层面考察了数字素养对老年人健康状况的影响,并识别了中介机制。研究结果增进了我们对数字化对老龄化社会积极影响的理解,并为政府制定更具针对性的积极老龄化战略提供了有益的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f078/11773774/02f2c2969e48/12913_2025_12314_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f078/11773774/4cb303aaffeb/12913_2025_12314_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f078/11773774/02f2c2969e48/12913_2025_12314_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f078/11773774/4cb303aaffeb/12913_2025_12314_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f078/11773774/02f2c2969e48/12913_2025_12314_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
How does digital literacy affect the health status of senior citizens? Micro-level evidence from the CFPS data.数字素养如何影响老年人的健康状况?来自中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)数据的微观层面证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 27;25(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12314-7.
2
The impact of digital literacy in enhancing individuals' health in China.数字素养对提升中国个人健康的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 29;25(1):364. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21454-8.
3
The impact of digital literacy on personal health: Evidence from the China family panel study.数字素养对个人健康的影响:来自中国家庭追踪调查的证据。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2024 Sep;39(5):1411-1433. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3816. Epub 2024 May 28.
4
How does digital life influence the health service use among rural residents? Evidence from China.数字生活如何影响农村居民的卫生服务利用?来自中国的证据。
Technol Health Care. 2023;31(6):2091-2106. doi: 10.3233/THC-220631.
5
The association between family socio-demographic factors, parental mediation and adolescents' digital literacy: a cross-sectional study.家庭社会人口学因素、父母中介作用与青少年数字素养的关系:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 23;24(1):2932. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20284-4.
6
The impact of digital literacy on the health behavior of rural older adults: evidence from China.数字素养对中国农村老年人健康行为的影响:来自中国的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 7;25(1):919. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21964-5.
7
Path analysis of the influence of digital health literacy on self-management behaviour among elderly patients with chronic diseases in rural China.中国农村老年慢性病患者数字健康素养对自我管理行为影响的路径分析
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Apr 29;25(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05952-3.
8
Enhancement or suppression: a double-edged sword? Differential association of digital literacy with subjective health of older adult-evidence from China.增强还是抑制:双刃剑?数字素养与中国老年人主观健康的关联差异——来自中国的证据。
Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 20;12:1395162. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1395162. eCollection 2024.
9
Enhancing digital literacy with an intelligent conversational agent for senior citizens in Thailand.利用智能对话代理提高泰国老年人的数字素养。
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2022;27(5):6251-6271. doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10862-z. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
10
Social health insurance, family support, and chronic diseases as determinants of health service utilization among senior citizens in rural Nepal.社会医疗保险、家庭支持以及慢性病对尼泊尔农村老年人医疗服务利用的影响因素
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 23;25(1):1512. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22693-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Digitalization, income inequality, and public health: Evidence from developing countries.数字化、收入不平等与公共卫生:来自发展中国家的证据。
Technol Soc. 2023 May;73:102210. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102210. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
2
"Digital Dividend" or "Digital Divide": What Role Does the Internet Play in the Health Inequalities among Chinese Residents?“数字红利”还是“数字鸿沟”:互联网在中国居民健康不平等中扮演什么角色?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 17;19(22):15162. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215162.
3
Rising childhood income inequality and declining Americans' health.
儿童收入不平等加剧与美国人健康状况下降。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jun;303:115016. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115016. Epub 2022 May 7.
4
The macro-level effect of religiosity on health.宗教信仰对健康的宏观影响。
Health Econ. 2022 Jun;31(6):993-1011. doi: 10.1002/hec.4494. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
5
Childhood socioeconomic status, adulthood obesity and health: The role of parental permanent and transitory income.儿童时期社会经济地位、成年期肥胖与健康:父母永久性和临时性收入的作用。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Aug;283:114178. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114178. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
6
The effects of income on health: Evidence from lottery wins in Singapore.收入对健康的影响:来自新加坡彩票中奖的证据。
J Health Econ. 2021 Mar;76:102414. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.102414. Epub 2020 Dec 20.
7
The Relevance of Online Social Relationships Among the Elderly: How Using the Web Could Enhance Quality of Life?老年人网络社交关系的相关性:使用网络如何提升生活质量?
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 2;11:551862. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.551862. eCollection 2020.
8
Exploring the Relationship Between Internet Use and Mental Health Among Older Adults in England: Longitudinal Observational Study.探索英格兰老年人互联网使用与心理健康之间的关系:纵向观察研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 28;22(7):e15683. doi: 10.2196/15683.
9
Public health digitalization in Europe.欧洲的公共卫生数字化。
Eur J Public Health. 2019 Oct 1;29(Supplement_3):28-35. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz161.
10
Yes, health is important, but as much for its importance via social life: The direct and indirect effects of health on subjective well-being in chronically ill individuals.是的,健康很重要,但同样重要的是其在社会生活方面的重要性:健康对慢性病患者主观幸福感的直接和间接影响。
Health Econ. 2018 Jan;27(1):209-222. doi: 10.1002/hec.3536. Epub 2017 Jun 29.