• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Physical Activity and Incident Pancreatic Cancer: Results From the UK Biobank Prospective Cohort.体力活动与胰腺癌发病率:来自英国生物银行前瞻性队列研究的结果
Cureus. 2025 Jan 26;17(1):e78040. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78040. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Elevated Glycated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) Is Associated with an Increased Risk of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A UK Biobank Cohort Study.糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)升高与胰腺导管腺癌风险增加相关:一项英国生物银行队列研究
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Aug 13;15(16):4078. doi: 10.3390/cancers15164078.
3
Physical activity and cancer risk: Findings from the UK Biobank, a large prospective cohort study.体力活动与癌症风险:来自英国生物库的大型前瞻性队列研究结果。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;68:101780. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2020.101780. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
4
The role of aspirin in the prevention of pancreatic cancer: A nested case-control study in the UK Biobank.阿司匹林在胰腺癌预防中的作用:英国生物库中的巢式病例对照研究。
Pancreatology. 2024 Sep;24(6):947-953. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2024.08.005. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
5
Physical activity and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A prospective cohort study in UK Biobank and Mendelian randomization analyses.体力活动与特发性肺纤维化:英国生物银行的一项前瞻性队列研究及孟德尔随机化分析
Respir Med Res. 2024 Nov;86:101141. doi: 10.1016/j.resmer.2024.101141. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
6
Intensity-specific physical activity measured by accelerometer and the risk of mortality among individuals with cardiometabolic diseases: A prospective study from the UK Biobank.加速度计测量的强度特异性身体活动与心血管代谢疾病患者的死亡风险:来自英国生物银行的前瞻性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 Aug;156:104786. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104786. Epub 2024 May 8.
7
Accelerometer-measured intensity-specific physical activity, genetic predisposition, and the risk of venous thromboembolism: a cohort study.加速度计测量的特定强度身体活动、遗传易感性与静脉血栓栓塞风险:一项队列研究。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2025 Jan 6;32(1):65-74. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwae273.
8
Associations of prior pulmonary tuberculosis with the incident COPD: a prospective cohort study.既往肺结核与 COPD 发病的相关性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2024 Jan-Dec;18:17534666241239455. doi: 10.1177/17534666241239455.
9
Do associations of physical activity and sedentary behaviour with cardiovascular disease and mortality differ across socioeconomic groups? A prospective analysis of device-measured and self-reported UK Biobank data.身体活动和久坐行为与心血管疾病和死亡率的关联是否因社会经济群体而异?使用设备测量和自我报告的英国生物库数据分析。
Br J Sports Med. 2023 Jul;57(14):921-929. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2022-105435. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
10
Association of handgrip strength and/or walking pace with incident chronic kidney disease: A UK biobank observational study.手握力和/或步行速度与新发慢性肾脏病的关系:英国生物库观察性研究。
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2023 Apr;14(2):805-814. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13180. Epub 2023 Jan 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
2
Comparison of risk factor associations in UK Biobank against representative, general population based studies with conventional response rates: prospective cohort study and individual participant meta-analysis.在常规应答率的情况下,与具有代表性的、基于一般人群的研究相比,英国生物银行中风险因素相关性的比较:前瞻性队列研究和个体参与者荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2020 Feb 12;368:m131. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m131.
3
The global, regional, and national burden of pancreatic cancer and its attributable risk factors in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.195 个国家和地区 1990-2017 年胰腺癌的全球、区域和国家负担及其可归因危险因素:2017 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Dec;4(12):934-947. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30347-4. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
4
Screening patients at high risk for pancreatic cancer-Is it time for a paradigm shift?筛查胰腺癌高危患者——是否到了范式转变的时候?
J Surg Oncol. 2019 Oct;120(5):851-857. doi: 10.1002/jso.25616. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
5
Physical Activity in Cancer Prevention and Survival: A Systematic Review.体力活动在癌症预防和生存中的作用:系统评价。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Jun;51(6):1252-1261. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001937.
6
Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer: Opportunities and Challenges.早期胰腺癌检测:机遇与挑战。
Gastroenterology. 2019 May;156(7):2024-2040. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.259. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
7
Pancreatic cancer: A review of clinical diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes.胰腺癌:临床诊断、流行病学、治疗和结局的综述。
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Nov 21;24(43):4846-4861. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i43.4846.
8
Physical Activity and Pancreatic Cancer Risk among Urban Chinese: Results from Two Prospective Cohort Studies.体力活动与城市中国人胰腺癌风险:两项前瞻性队列研究结果。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 Apr;27(4):479-487. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0895. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
9
Genetics of pancreatic cancer and implications for therapy.胰腺癌的遗传学及其对治疗的影响。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018 Feb;43(2):404-414. doi: 10.1007/s00261-017-1394-y.
10
Chronic Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.慢性胰腺炎与胰腺癌风险:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Sep;112(9):1366-1372. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.218. Epub 2017 Aug 1.

体力活动与胰腺癌发病率:来自英国生物银行前瞻性队列研究的结果

Physical Activity and Incident Pancreatic Cancer: Results From the UK Biobank Prospective Cohort.

作者信息

Assarian Borna A, Byrne Christopher D, McDonnell Declan, Hamady Zaed

机构信息

Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine University of Southampton, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, GBR.

Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, GBR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Jan 26;17(1):e78040. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78040. eCollection 2025 Jan.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.78040
PMID:39872920
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11770282/
Abstract

Background The relationship between physical activity and incident pancreatic cancer is poorly defined, and the evidence to date is inconsistent, largely due to small sample sizes and insufficient incident outcomes. Using the UK Biobank cohort dataset, the association between physical activity levels at recruitment and incident pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) at follow-up was analysed. Method Physical activity, the key exposure, was quantified using Metabolic Equivalent Task (MET) values and categorised into walking, moderate, and vigorous activity. These categories were each analysed in quartiles. Summed activity was analysed both in quartiles and using International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) activity levels (low, moderate, high). Univariate hazard ratios (HRs) and multivariable-adjusted HRs (aHRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox regression analyses. Results A total of 542 incident PDAC cases and 2,139 controls (1:4 matching for age and sex) with a median (IQR) follow-up of 6.8 (1.7) years were analysed. No significant association was found in walking, moderate, and vigorous activities. In summed activity, only the 3rd quartile showed a statistically significant inverse association with PDAC risk (aHR 0.67, 95% CI 0.52-0.86, p<0.01). For IPAQ activity, the moderate and high activity groups showed borderline statistically significant associations with incident PDAC (aHR 0.80, 95% CI 0.63-1.00, p=0.05, and aHR 0.80, 95% CI 0.64-1.01, p=0.06, respectively). Conclusion The large UK Biobank cohort study did not show a strong association between physical activity levels and the development of incident PDAC.

摘要

背景

体力活动与胰腺癌发病之间的关系尚不明确,且目前的证据并不一致,这主要是由于样本量较小以及发病结局数据不足。利用英国生物银行队列数据集,分析了入组时的体力活动水平与随访期间胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)发病之间的关联。

方法

将关键暴露因素体力活动通过代谢当量任务(MET)值进行量化,并分为步行、中等强度和剧烈活动。对这些类别分别按四分位数进行分析。对总活动量按四分位数以及使用国际体力活动问卷(IPAQ)活动水平(低、中、高)进行分析。使用Cox回归分析计算单变量风险比(HRs)和多变量调整后的风险比(aHRs)及其95%置信区间(CIs)。

结果

共分析了542例PDAC发病病例和2139例对照(年龄和性别1:4匹配),中位(IQR)随访时间为6.8(1.7)年。在步行、中等强度和剧烈活动中未发现显著关联。在总活动量方面,只有第三个四分位数显示出与PDAC风险存在统计学显著的负相关(aHR 0.67,95%CI 0.52 - 0.86,p<0.01)。对于IPAQ活动水平,中等强度和高强度活动组与PDAC发病显示出临界统计学显著关联(aHR分别为0.80,95%CI 0.63 - 1.00,p = 0.05;以及aHR 0.80,95%CI 0.64 - 1.01,p = 0.06)。

结论

大型英国生物银行队列研究未显示体力活动水平与PDAC发病之间存在强关联。