• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共同制定腹膜透析护理敏感指标以提升护理质量:一项跨国共识构建设计

Co-Producing Peritoneal Dialysis Nursing Sensitive Indicators for Quality Care: A Multinational Consensus Building Design.

作者信息

Baillie Jessica, Bonner Ann, Guillouet Sonia, Mikut Cornelia, Punzalan Sally, Kaczmarek Anna, Wenzyl Lawrence Climaco, Finderup Jeanette

机构信息

School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Australia and Aarhus University, Gold Coast, Denmark.

出版信息

J Ren Care. 2025 Mar;51(1):e70008. doi: 10.1111/jorc.70008.

DOI:10.1111/jorc.70008
PMID:39873351
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11774010/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nursing sensitive indicators are a way of measuring aspects of patient care that are most affected by the actions of the nurse. Despite the existence of nursing sensitive indicators, these are largely not suitable to measure peritoneal dialysis nursing practice.

OBJECTIVE

This project aimed to co-develop a set of peritoneal dialysis nursing-sensitive indicators.

DESIGN

Informed by the Donabedian quality framework (structure, process, outcome), a multinational co-production consensus design was used.

PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENTS

First, an expert panel of seven professionals proposed potential indicators from clinical expertise and examining peer-reviewed articles and clinical guidelines. Next, the expert panel undertook a consensus building process involving face-to-face meetings and online discussion to refine the indicators. Lastly indicator confirmation was undertaken using a 5-point rating scale involving delegates at a major conference.

RESULTS

The initial indicator proposal, based on evidence and clinical experience, identified 65 potential indicators (20 structural, 22 process and 23 outcome). The consensus process involved discussion and negotiation to reduce the potential indicators to 28 (eight structural, 12 process and eight outcome). Confirmation involved 25 nurses with all 28 indicators supported (all > 3.5/5). Indicators highly supported were patient satisfaction, fluid balance assessment, peritoneal dialysis catheter exit-site, clinical signs measurement, peritonitis investigation, peritoneal dialysis catheter complications referral and infection rates.

CONCLUSION

Following further validity, reliability and feasibility testing, these nursing sensitive indicators can be used to measure the quality of peritoneal dialysis nursing care provided for patients and families.

摘要

背景

护理敏感指标是衡量受护士行为影响最大的患者护理方面的一种方式。尽管存在护理敏感指标,但这些指标在很大程度上并不适用于衡量腹膜透析护理实践。

目的

本项目旨在共同制定一套腹膜透析护理敏感指标。

设计

以唐纳贝迪安质量框架(结构、过程、结果)为指导,采用跨国联合生产共识设计。

参与者和测量方法

首先,由七名专业人员组成的专家小组根据临床专业知识、查阅同行评审文章和临床指南提出潜在指标。接下来,专家小组开展了一个共识构建过程,包括面对面会议和在线讨论,以完善指标。最后,在一次大型会议上,使用5分制评分量表对代表们进行指标确认。

结果

基于证据和临床经验的初始指标提案确定了65个潜在指标(20个结构指标、22个过程指标和23个结果指标)。共识过程涉及讨论和协商,将潜在指标减少到28个(8个结构指标、12个过程指标和8个结果指标)。确认过程涉及25名护士,所有28个指标均得到支持(均>3.5/5)。得到高度支持的指标包括患者满意度、液体平衡评估、腹膜透析导管出口部位、临床体征测量、腹膜炎调查、腹膜透析导管并发症转诊和感染率。

结论

经过进一步的有效性、可靠性和可行性测试后,这些护理敏感指标可用于衡量为患者及其家庭提供的腹膜透析护理质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1072/11774010/db2febaa7b26/JORC-51-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1072/11774010/5e5df24e563c/JORC-51-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1072/11774010/db2febaa7b26/JORC-51-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1072/11774010/5e5df24e563c/JORC-51-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1072/11774010/db2febaa7b26/JORC-51-0-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Co-Producing Peritoneal Dialysis Nursing Sensitive Indicators for Quality Care: A Multinational Consensus Building Design.共同制定腹膜透析护理敏感指标以提升护理质量:一项跨国共识构建设计
J Ren Care. 2025 Mar;51(1):e70008. doi: 10.1111/jorc.70008.
2
Exit site care in the Netherlands: the use of guidelines in practice.荷兰的出口部位护理:指南在实践中的应用。
J Ren Care. 2017 Sep;43(3):156-162. doi: 10.1111/jorc.12199. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
3
An Environmental Scan and Evaluation of Home Dialysis Quality Indicators Currently Used in Canada.加拿大目前使用的家庭透析质量指标的环境扫描与评估
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2020 Dec 11;7:2054358120977391. doi: 10.1177/2054358120977391. eCollection 2020.
4
Developing metrics for nursing quality of care for low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review linked to stakeholder engagement.发展中低收入国家护理质量的衡量标准:与利益相关者参与相关的范围综述。
Hum Resour Health. 2020 May 14;18(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12960-020-00470-2.
5
A quality indicator set for use in rehabilitation team care of people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases; development and pilot testing.用于风湿性和肌肉骨骼疾病患者康复团队护理的质量指标集;开发与试点测试
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr 29;19(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4091-4.
6
Development of evidence-based nursing-sensitive quality indicators for emergency nursing: A Delphi study.基于证据的急诊护理敏感质量指标的制定:德尔菲研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Aug;27(15-16):3008-3019. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14256.
7
Developing clinical performance measures based on the Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative Clinical Practice Guidelines: process, outcomes, and implications.基于透析结果质量改进临床实践指南制定临床绩效指标:过程、结果及影响
Am J Kidney Dis. 2003 Oct;42(4):806-12. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(03)00867-9.
8
Development of a quality indicator set to measure and improve quality of ICU care for patients with traumatic brain injury.开发一套质量指标集,以衡量和改善创伤性脑损伤患者 ICU 护理质量。
Crit Care. 2019 Mar 22;23(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2377-x.
9
Peritoneal dialysis practice in Australia and New Zealand: A call to sustain the action.澳大利亚和新西兰的腹膜透析实践:呼吁持续行动。
Nephrology (Carlton). 2016 Jul;21(7):535-46. doi: 10.1111/nep.12731.
10
Collaborative identification and prioritisation of mental health nursing care process metrics and indicators: a Delphi consensus study.协作识别和优先考虑心理健康护理流程指标:德尔菲共识研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 16;22(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07659-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Nursing Quality Indicators in Emergency Nursing: A Scoping Review.急诊护理中的护理质量指标:一项范围综述
J Nurs Care Qual. 2024;39(4):376-382. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000790. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
2
Nurse-based educational interventions in patients with peritoneal dialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹膜透析患者基于护士的教育干预措施:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2022 Sep 24;4:100102. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2022.100102. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
Assisted peritoneal dialysis: Position paper for the ISPD.
辅助性腹膜透析:国际腹膜透析学会立场文件
Perit Dial Int. 2024 May;44(3):160-170. doi: 10.1177/08968608241246447. Epub 2024 May 7.
4
Clinical observation and influence on nutritional status of intensive nutritional nursing combined with 3-day dietary diary intervention in peritoneal dialysis patients.临床观察及 3 日膳食日记干预对腹膜透析患者营养状况的影响
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2024 Apr;37(2):484-490. doi: 10.1111/jhn.13270. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
5
Peritoneal Dialysis Patient Training Program to Enhance independence and Prevent Complications: A Scoping Review.腹膜透析患者培训计划以增强独立性并预防并发症:一项范围综述
Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2023 Sep 11;16:207-222. doi: 10.2147/IJNRD.S414447. eCollection 2023.
6
Rating versus ranking in a Delphi survey: a randomized controlled trial.德尔菲调查中的评分与排名:一项随机对照试验。
Trials. 2023 Aug 18;24(1):543. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07442-6.
7
ISPD Catheter-related Infection Recommendations: 2023 Update.国际腹膜透析学会导管相关性感染推荐:2023 更新版。
Perit Dial Int. 2023 May;43(3):201-219. doi: 10.1177/08968608231172740. Epub 2023 May 26.
8
Perceptions of peritonitis risk, prevention, diagnosis and stigma: Findings from a mixed methods study with patients and relatives using peritoneal dialysis.腹膜炎风险、预防、诊断和污名的认知:一项使用腹膜透析的患者和家属进行的混合方法研究的结果。
J Ren Care. 2024 Jun;50(2):138-150. doi: 10.1111/jorc.12464. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
9
An examination of primary health care nursing service evaluation using the Donabedian model: A systematic review.运用 Donabedian 模型考察基层医疗护理服务评价:系统评价。
Res Nurs Health. 2023 Feb;46(1):159-176. doi: 10.1002/nur.22291. Epub 2022 Dec 25.
10
Existing guidance on reporting of consensus methodology: a systematic review to inform ACCORD guideline development.现有共识方法报告指南:为 ACCORD 指南制定提供信息的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 8;12(9):e065154. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065154.