• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症患者及其亲属对临床试验的了解。

Understanding of Clinical Trials Among Patients With Cancer and Their Relatives.

作者信息

Kubilay Tolunay Pinar, Erol Cihan, Kahraman Seda, Yildiz Tacar Seher, Özcan Erkan, Bugdayci Basal Fatma, Köse Fatih, Sendur Mehmet Ali Nahit, Tural Deniz, Çiçin Irfan, Öksüzoglu Berna, Kiliçkap Saadettin, Ürün Yüksel

机构信息

Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey.

Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University Faculty of Medicine Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2457020. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.57020.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.57020
PMID:39874033
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11775742/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Clinical trials are vital for advancing cancer treatments and improving patient outcomes. Understanding the factors that influence participants' decision-making is critical for enhancing trial recruitment.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the attitudes of patients with cancer and their relatives toward clinical trial participation, identifying key barriers and motivators that affect their willingness to engage in such trials.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional survey study was conducted between April 2020 and April 2021. Face-to-face questionnaires were administered by physicians across 6 tertiary hospital medical oncology departments in Turkey. Adults with cancer and their relatives were recruited. Data were analyzed from April to December 2021.

EXPOSURE

Participants' knowledge, perceptions, and motivations regarding clinical trial participation were assessed through a structured questionnaire.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Participants' demographic information, their willingness to participate in clinical trials, their perceptions about the clinical trial participation, and the facilitators and barriers to participation.

RESULTS

A total of 978 participants were surveyed, with a median (range) age of 52 (18-82) years; 485 (49.6%) were male and 479 (49.0%) female. Of these, 578 (59.1%) were patients with cancer and 382 (39.1%) family members. Prior clinical trial experience was reported by 174 participants (17.8%), and 428 (43.8%) expressed a willingness to participate in clinical trials. Participants well-informed about clinical trials showed higher willingness (50 of 87 [57.5%] very willing) compared with those with no knowledge (27 of 303 [8.9%] very willing) (χ2 = 275.095; P < .001). Greater willingness was observed in participants from less developed cities compared with the most developed cities (88 of 321 [27.4%] vs 94 of 615 [15.3%]; χ2 = 21.093; P < .001), in individuals with a high school degree or greater compared with those with less than a high school degree (105 of 489 [21.5%] vs 76 of 452 [16.8%]; χ2 = 33.311; P < .001), in those with monthly incomes above compared with below the poverty line (81 of 409 [19.8%] vs 100 of 512 [19.5%]; χ2 = 16.145; P = .003), in those without prior cancer treatment compared with those with prior cancer treatment (125 of 591 [21.2%] vs 40 of 289 [13.8%]; χ2 = 13.801; P = .008), and in participants with prior trial experience compared with those without (74 of 166 [44.6%] vs 111 of 786 [14.1%]; χ2 = 87.771; P < .001). Participants were motivated by potential personal health benefits (604 [61.8%]) and access to new treatments (522 [53.4%]). The primary concerns included potential adverse effects (555 [56.7%]), feeling like a "test subject" (284 [29.0%]), and the risk of receiving a placebo (197 [20.1%]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this survey study of patients with cancer and their relatives, significant gaps in knowledge and persistent concerns about clinical trial safety were highlighted, impacting participation. Addressing these concerns through targeted education and transparent communication is essential for improving participation rates and ensuring more inclusive cancer research.

摘要

重要性

临床试验对于推进癌症治疗和改善患者预后至关重要。了解影响参与者决策的因素对于提高试验招募率至关重要。

目的

评估癌症患者及其亲属对参与临床试验的态度,确定影响他们参与此类试验意愿的关键障碍和动机。

设计、设置和参与者:这项横断面调查研究于2020年4月至2021年4月进行。土耳其6个三级医院医学肿瘤科室的医生进行了面对面问卷调查。招募了成年癌症患者及其亲属。数据于2021年4月至12月进行分析。

暴露因素

通过结构化问卷评估参与者对参与临床试验的知识、认知和动机。

主要结局和测量指标

参与者的人口统计学信息、参与临床试验的意愿、对参与临床试验的认知以及参与的促进因素和障碍。

结果

共调查了978名参与者,中位(范围)年龄为52(18 - 82)岁;485名(49.6%)为男性,479名(49.0%)为女性。其中,578名(59.1%)为癌症患者,382名(39.1%)为家庭成员。174名参与者(17.8%)报告有过临床试验经验,428名(43.8%)表示愿意参与临床试验。与不了解临床试验的参与者相比,充分了解临床试验的参与者表现出更高的意愿(87名中有50名[57.5%]非常愿意)(χ2 = 275.095;P <.001)。与最发达城市的参与者相比,欠发达城市的参与者意愿更高(321名中有88名[27.4%] vs 615名中有94名[15.3%];χ2 = 21.093;P <.001),高中及以上学历的个体比高中以下学历的个体意愿更高(489名中有105名[21.5%] vs 452名中有76名[16.8%];χ2 = 33.311;P <.001),月收入高于贫困线的参与者比低于贫困线的参与者意愿更高(409名中有81名[19.8%] vs 512名中有100名[19.5%];χ2 = 16.145;P =.003),未接受过癌症治疗的参与者比接受过癌症治疗的参与者意愿更高(591名中有125名[21.2%] vs 289名中有40名[13.8%];χ2 = 13.801;P =.008),有过试验经验的参与者比没有试验经验的参与者意愿更高(166名中有74名[44.6%] vs 786名中有111名[14.1%];χ2 = 87.771;P <.001)。参与者的动机包括潜在的个人健康益处(604名[61.8%])和获得新治疗方法(522名[53.4%])。主要担忧包括潜在的不良反应(555名[56.7%])、感觉像“试验对象”(284名[29.0%])以及接受安慰剂的风险(197名[20.1%])。

结论和相关性

在这项针对癌症患者及其亲属的调查研究中,突出了知识方面的显著差距以及对临床试验安全性的持续担忧,这影响了参与度。通过有针对性的教育和透明的沟通来解决这些担忧对于提高参与率和确保更具包容性的癌症研究至关重要。

相似文献

1
Understanding of Clinical Trials Among Patients With Cancer and Their Relatives.癌症患者及其亲属对临床试验的了解。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2457020. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.57020.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
4
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.儿童癌症幸存者的营养干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2.
6
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5(10):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3.
7
Risk-stratified Care Improves Pain-related Knowledge and Reduces Psychological Distress for Low Back Pain: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial.风险分层护理可提高腰痛患者的疼痛相关知识并减轻心理困扰:一项随机试验的二次分析
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):607-620. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003351. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
8
A Pilot Study of Political Experiences and Barriers to Voting Among Autistic Adults Participating in Online Survey Research in the United States.一项针对参与美国在线调查研究的成年自闭症患者的政治经历和投票障碍的试点研究。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):261-272. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0119. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.心理健康问题患者的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.
10
Prevention of self-harm and suicide in young people up to the age of 25 in education settings.在教育环境中预防25岁及以下年轻人的自我伤害和自杀行为。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 20;12(12):CD013844. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013844.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Survival Benefit Associated With Participation in Clinical Trials of Anticancer Drugs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.参与抗癌药物临床试验与生存获益的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2024 Jun 25;331(24):2105-2113. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.6281.
2
The Benefits and Risks of Receiving Investigational Solid Tumor Drugs in Randomized Trials : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.在随机试验中接受实体瘤研究性药物的益处与风险:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Ann Intern Med. 2024 Jun;177(6):759-767. doi: 10.7326/M23-2515. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
3
The emotional side of taking part in a cancer clinical trial.参与癌症临床试验的情感层面。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 24;18(4):e0284268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284268. eCollection 2023.
4
Assessing population diversity in phase III trials of cancer drugs supporting Food and Drug Administration approval in solid tumors.评估支持 FDA 批准实体瘤癌症药物 III 期临床试验中的人群多样性。
Int J Cancer. 2021 Oct 1;149(7):1455-1462. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33708. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
5
Are cancer patients better off if they participate in clinical trials? A mixed methods study.癌症患者参与临床试验是否获益更多?一项混合方法研究。
BMC Cancer. 2020 May 8;20(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06916-z.
6
Why do patients take part in research? An overview of systematic reviews of psychosocial barriers and facilitators.患者为什么参与研究?对心理社会障碍和促进因素的系统评价综述
Trials. 2020 Mar 12;21(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4197-3.
7
Overcoming Barriers to Clinical Trial Enrollment.克服临床试验入组障碍。
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019 Jan;39:105-114. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_243729. Epub 2019 May 17.
8
How Cancer Patients Perceive Clinical Trials (CTs) in the Era of CTs: Current Perception and Its Differences Between Common and Rare Cancers.癌症患者如何看待临床试验(CTs):当前的认知及其在常见癌症和罕见癌症之间的差异。
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Jun;35(3):545-556. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-01494-6.
9
Inadequate Awareness of and Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials in the Community Oncology Setting.社区肿瘤环境中对癌症临床试验的认识不足和参与度不够。
Oncology (Williston Park). 2019 Feb 15;33(2):54-7.
10
Global Public Attitudes About Clinical Research and Patient Experiences With Clinical Trials.全球公众对临床研究的态度和患者参与临床试验的体验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Oct 5;1(6):e182969. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2969.