University of York, York, UK.
Kings College London, London, UK.
Trials. 2020 Mar 12;21(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4197-3.
Understanding why people take part in health research is critical to improve research efficiency and generalisability. The aim of this overview of systematic reviews was to identify psychosocial determinants of research participation and map them to psychological theory and empirical recruitment research, to identify effective strategies to increase research participation.
Qualitative and quantitative systematic reviews were systematically identified. No date or language limits were applied. Two reviewers independently selected reviews. Methodological quality was rated using AMSTAR, and poor-quality reviews (scoring 0-3) were excluded. Barriers and facilitators were coded to psychological theory (Theoretical Domains Framework) and empirical recruitment research (recruitment interventions that had been subjected to randomised controlled trial evaluation).
We included 26 systematic reviews (429 unique primary studies), covering a wide range of patient populations and health settings. We identified five groups of facilitators, of which three were dominant (potential for personal benefit, altruism, trust) and appear to be relevant across research setting and design. We identified nine groups of barriers, which were more dependent on the particular study (context, population, design). Two determinants (participant information, social influences) were found to be both barriers and facilitators. Barriers and facilitators could be coded to the Motivation and Opportunity components of the Theoretical Domains Framework; only one was coded to a Capability component. There was some overlap between psychosocial determinants and empirical recruitment research, but some barriers and facilitators had not been tested at all.
Identifying effective recruitment strategies could increase the efficiency and generalisability of primary research. We identified a number of barriers and facilitators that could be addressed by researchers. There is a need for more research to identify effective recruitment strategies that draw on the psychosocial facilitators and barriers identified in this overview.
了解人们参与健康研究的原因对于提高研究效率和推广性至关重要。本系统综述的目的是确定研究参与的心理社会决定因素,并将其映射到心理理论和实证招募研究中,以确定增加研究参与的有效策略。
系统地识别了定性和定量的系统评价。没有应用日期或语言限制。两位评审员独立选择了综述。使用 AMSTAR 对方法学质量进行了评分,并且排除了质量较差(评分 0-3)的综述。将障碍和促进因素编码到心理理论(理论领域框架)和实证招募研究(已接受随机对照试验评估的招募干预措施)中。
我们纳入了 26 项系统评价(429 项独特的初级研究),涵盖了广泛的患者人群和健康环境。我们确定了五个促进因素组,其中三个是主要因素(个人受益潜力、利他主义、信任),并且似乎在不同的研究环境和设计中都相关。我们确定了九个障碍组,这些障碍更多地取决于特定的研究(背景、人群、设计)。两个决定因素(参与者信息、社会影响)被发现既是障碍又是促进因素。障碍和促进因素可以编码到理论领域框架的动机和机会组成部分;只有一个被编码到能力组成部分。心理社会决定因素和实证招募研究之间存在一些重叠,但有些障碍和促进因素根本没有得到测试。
确定有效的招募策略可以提高主要研究的效率和推广性。我们确定了一些可以由研究人员解决的障碍和促进因素。需要更多的研究来确定利用本综述中确定的研究参与的心理社会促进因素和障碍的有效招募策略。