Davies Sarah L, Cuthbertson Daniel J, Ward Louise J, Wassif Wassif S, Gurnell Mark, Davison Andrew S
Liverpool Clinical Laboratories, Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Metabolic Medicine, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Ann Clin Biochem. 2025 Jul;62(4):312-325. doi: 10.1177/00045632251319984. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
ObjectivesPrimary aldosteronism (PA) is a common but under-recognised cause of secondary hypertension. Early diagnosis with targeted medical and/or surgical intervention is important to prevent irreversible end-organ damage. An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline was used to define audit standards against which to assess current United Kingdom (UK) laboratory practice.MethodsA survey comprising 22 questions, which captured information on screening, confirmatory testing and adrenal vein sampling (AVS), was distributed to all UK Clinical Biochemistry laboratories by the Association for Laboratory Medicine. Consultation with clinical colleagues was encouraged.Results50 of 147 laboratories (34.0%) responded, 17 of which provided an analytical service for plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) and renin, measured as plasma renin activity (PRA) or direct renin concentration (DRC). PRA/DRC, PAC and aldosterone:renin ratios were used to screen for PA. Saline infusion testing was the most common confirmatory test. AVS was used to aid lateralisation. Chemiluminescence immunoassay and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry were the preferred analytical methods for PAC and PRA/DRC. However, there was considerable variation across centres in respect of reference intervals and cutoffs, which were not fully accounted for by differences in analytical platforms. Although diagnostic algorithms, with pre- and post-analytical support, were in evidence in some centres, these were not universal or always embedded in a multidisciplinary team setting.ConclusionsWe observed significant heterogeneity in the laboratory investigation of PA across the United Kingdom. Therefore, this work serves as a stimulus for greater collaboration to permit national harmonisation/standardisation of analytical and clinical aspects of UK PA practice.
目的
原发性醛固酮增多症(PA)是继发性高血压常见但未得到充分认识的病因。早期诊断并进行有针对性的药物和/或手术干预对于预防不可逆的终末器官损害至关重要。采用内分泌学会临床实践指南来定义审核标准,以此评估英国当前实验室的做法。
方法
由检验医学协会向英国所有临床生物化学实验室分发了一份包含22个问题的调查问卷,该问卷收集了有关筛查、确诊检测和肾上腺静脉采血(AVS)的信息。鼓励与临床同事进行磋商。
结果
147家实验室中有50家(34.0%)做出回应,其中17家提供血浆醛固酮浓度(PAC)和肾素的分析服务,肾素以血浆肾素活性(PRA)或直接肾素浓度(DRC)来衡量。PRA/DRC、PAC以及醛固酮与肾素比值用于筛查PA。生理盐水输注试验是最常见的确诊检测。AVS用于辅助定位。化学发光免疫分析法和液相色谱串联质谱分析法是检测PAC和PRA/DRC的首选分析方法。然而,各中心在参考区间和临界值方面存在很大差异,分析平台的差异并不能完全解释这些差异。尽管一些中心有诊断算法以及分析前和分析后的支持,但这些并非普遍存在,也并非总是融入多学科团队环境中。
结论
我们观察到英国各地PA的实验室检测存在显著异质性。因此,这项工作促使各方加强合作,以便在英国PA实践的分析和临床方面实现全国范围内的协调/标准化。