Revuelta Alfonso, Mihic Luka, Castillo Alfredo, Mariño Axel, Mateos Lucía, Iglesias Claudia, Sáenz de Jubera Carmen, Fernández Cristina, Rodríguez-Rubí David, Jiménez-Fonseca Paula, Berros José Pablo, Esteban Emilio
Medical Oncology Department, Central University Hospital of Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 28;15(1):3512. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86393-1.
Totally implantable central venous catheters (CVCs) are widely used in the management of patients with malignant diseases. Conventionally, port implantations were carried out by general surgeons and vascular radiologists. In recent years, the medical staff of the Medical Oncology department at the Central University Hospital of Asturias (HUCA) has developed a simplified methodology for the routine implantation of these devices. The aim of this study was to review our experience of CVCs and analyze the outcomes regarding catheter duration, complications, and cost comparison with respect to conventional port implantation by vascular radiologists. An observational epidemiological study was conducted, analyzing the methodology performed in a non-surgical, outpatient setting utilizing the Seldinger technique, without fluoroscopic control. A thorax X-ray was performed after each procedure and no prophylactic antibiotics were required. From January 2015 to March 2019, five hundred port systems were implanted, with a median age of 62 years (range 18-81), male 286/female 214. Most patients had a digestive tumor (79.4%). The right jugular vein was the most accessed in 345 patients (69%), followed by right subclavian in 144 (29%). Complications were observed in 49 patients (9.8%), immediate in 16 (3.2%), and late in 33 (6.6%). Thirty-nine devices were removed (7.8%). The cost incurred for port implantations by medical oncologists was lower (994.38 € cheaper for each device) compared to those implanted by vascular radiologists. Our experience suggests that implantation of port devices by medical oncologist in a non-surgical environment is safe and cost saving regarding conventional procedures.
完全植入式中心静脉导管(CVC)在恶性疾病患者的治疗中被广泛应用。传统上,端口植入由普通外科医生和血管放射科医生进行。近年来,阿斯图里亚斯中央大学医院(HUCA)肿瘤内科的医务人员开发了一种简化的方法用于这些装置的常规植入。本研究的目的是回顾我们在CVC方面的经验,并分析导管留置时间、并发症以及与血管放射科医生进行的传统端口植入相比的成本比较等结果。进行了一项观察性流行病学研究,分析了在非手术门诊环境中使用Seldinger技术且无透视控制下所采用的方法。每次手术后进行胸部X线检查,无需预防性使用抗生素。从2015年1月至2019年3月,共植入了500个端口系统,中位年龄为62岁(范围为18 - 81岁),男性286例/女性214例。大多数患者患有消化肿瘤(79.4%)。345例患者(69%)最常选择右颈内静脉,其次是144例(29%)选择右锁骨下静脉。49例患者(9.8%)出现并发症,其中16例(3.2%)为即刻并发症,33例(6.6%)为迟发并发症。39个装置被移除(7.8%)。与血管放射科医生植入的相比,肿瘤内科医生进行端口植入的成本更低(每个装置便宜994.38欧元)。我们的经验表明,肿瘤内科医生在非手术环境中植入端口装置对于传统手术而言是安全且节省成本的。