Piersanti Alessandra, Garra Rossella, Sbaraglia Fabio, Del Vicario Miryam, Lamacchia Rosa, Rossi Marco
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Agostino Gemelli IRCCS University Polyclinic Foundation, Rome, Italy.
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2025 Jan 28;5(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s44158-025-00226-1.
Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are routinely used in anesthesia practice. An undetected, incomplete recovery of neuromuscular function at the end of surgery potentially exposes patients to clinical deterioration in the postoperative period. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade (RNMB) in a cohort of patients receiving NMBAs.
We enrolled 90 spontaneously breathing adult patients admitted to the recovery room (RR) after completion of surgeries having received at least 1 dose of NMBA. Anesthesia management, the dosage of NMBA used, and whether monitoring of neuromonitoring function was employed or if a reversal agent was administered were all at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist, who was unaware that neuromuscular function was going to be monitored in the RR. The primary objective of this study was to determine the incidence of RNMB (defined as a train-of-four ratio ≤ 0.9). The secondary objectives were the number of postoperative adverse respiratory events and, for exploratory purposes, the estimation of potential risk factors through logistic regression analysis.
RNMB occurred in 5 (5%) patients who had received only one dose of NMBA at induction of anesthesia. Two patients with RNMB (40%) required O supplementation during monitoring in the RR, compared to 11 patients in the rest of the sample (13%). Additionally, 2 of these patients (2%) required O supplementation before hospital discharge due to O desaturation < 92%. None of the patients with RNMB had received a reversal of neuromuscular blockade at the end of surgery. The association between RNMB and potential risk factors, assessed through multivariable logistic regression did not yield significant results for any of the considered variables.
RNMB can occur even when a single dose of NMBAs is administered. Despite decades of extensive literature on the risks of RNMB and recent guidelines, routine monitoring of neuromuscular function and pharmacologic reversal of NMBA is still substandard. Routine monitoring of neuromuscular function is strongly advocated to enhance the level of patient care.
The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT06193213 , date of registration: 05/01/2024).
神经肌肉阻滞剂(NMBAs)在麻醉实践中经常使用。手术结束时未被检测到的神经肌肉功能不完全恢复可能会使患者在术后出现临床恶化。本研究的目的是调查接受NMBAs的一组患者术后残余神经肌肉阻滞(RNMB)的发生率。
我们纳入了90例在完成手术并至少接受1剂NMBA后入住恢复室(RR)的自主呼吸成年患者。麻醉管理、使用的NMBA剂量、是否采用神经监测功能监测或是否使用逆转剂均由主治麻醉医师自行决定,该医师不知道RR中将对神经肌肉功能进行监测。本研究的主要目的是确定RNMB的发生率(定义为四个成串刺激比值≤0.9)。次要目标是术后不良呼吸事件的数量,并且出于探索目的,通过逻辑回归分析估计潜在风险因素。
5例(5%)仅在麻醉诱导时接受一剂NMBA的患者发生了RNMB。2例发生RNMB的患者(40%)在RR监测期间需要补充氧气,而其余样本中的11例患者(13%)需要补充氧气。此外,其中2例患者(2%)因氧饱和度<92%在出院前需要补充氧气。所有发生RNMB的患者在手术结束时均未接受神经肌肉阻滞逆转。通过多变量逻辑回归评估的RNMB与潜在风险因素之间的关联,对于任何考虑的变量均未产生显著结果。
即使只给予一剂NMBAs,也可能发生RNMB。尽管关于RNMB风险已有数十年的大量文献以及近期的指南,但神经肌肉功能的常规监测和NMBA的药物逆转仍未达标。强烈主张进行神经肌肉功能的常规监测以提高患者护理水平。
该研究在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT06193213,注册日期:2024年1月5日)。