Beatrici Edoardo, De Carne Fabio, Frego Nicola, Moretto Stefano, Paciotti Marco, Fasulo Vittorio, Uleri Alessandro, Garofano Giuseppe, Avolio Pier Paolo, Chiarelli Giuseppe, Contieri Roberto, Arena Paola, Saitta Cesare, Sordelli Federica, Saita Alberto, Hurle Rodolfo, Casale Paolo, Buffi NicolòMaria, Lazzeri Massimo, Lughezzani Giovanni
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.
Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.
Prostate. 2025 May;85(6):603-611. doi: 10.1002/pros.24862. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
We aim to critically assess Microultrasound (mUS) clinical performance in an outpatient setting, focusing on its ability to reduce unnecessary diagnostic procedures, potentially reshape prostate cancer (PCa) diagnostic protocols, and increase the ability to rule out clinically significant (Gleason Score ≥ 3 + 4) PCa (csPCa).
Between November 2018 and April 2022, we conducted a prospective study involving men who underwent mUS examination due to clinical symptoms, PSA elevation, or opportunistic early detection of PCa. Experienced urologists performed mUS assessments in an outpatient setting using the prostate risk identification using micro-ultrasound (PRI-MUS) protocol to identify lesions suspicious of csPCa (PRI-MUS score ≥ 3). Men with negative mUS results were followed through consistent phone follow-up calls and visits until October 2023 to assess their diagnostic and therapeutic pathways. Using Cox regression models adjusted for PSA levels, DRE results, age, and previous biopsy history, we calculated the hazard ratio (HR) for biopsy-free (BFS), defined as the time from mUS to biopsy or last follow-up, cancer-free survival (CFS), and clinically significant cancer-free survival (csCFS) within the cohort based on mUS results.
Overall, 425 men were enrolled. The median (IQR) age was 66 (59-72) years, PSA levels were 5.7 (4.0-7.9) ng/mL, prostate volume was 44 (31.5-62.1) mL, and the median follow-up was 39 months (27-53). mUS identified lesions suggesting csPCa in 201/425 (47.3%) men. Overall, mUS resulted negative in 224/425 (52.7%) men, of whom 207/224 (92.4%) did not undergo subsequent mpMRI, while 22/224 (9.8%) proceeded with mpMRI according to the referring physician's decision. The latter detected suspicious lesions in 12/22 cases (54.5%), but only 2/12 (16.7%) were confirmed by biopsy as csPCa. Among those with negative mUS results, 192/224 (85.7%) men avoided additional biopsies during follow-up. Men with negative mUS results exhibited superior BFS (aHR: 0.17; p < 0.001), CFS (aHR:0.12; p < 0.001), and csCFS (aHR:0.09; p < 0.001) survival rates compared to their mUS-positive counterparts.
Our findings suggest that mUS can potentially refine patient stratification and transform PCa screening and diagnostic protocols. Pending validation by other studies, a wider implementation of mUS could optimize resource allocation, minimize wastage, and reserve additional costly tests.
我们旨在严格评估门诊环境中微超声(mUS)的临床性能,重点关注其减少不必要诊断程序的能力、可能重塑前列腺癌(PCa)诊断方案的能力以及提高排除临床显著(Gleason评分≥3+4)前列腺癌(csPCa)的能力。
2018年11月至2022年4月期间,我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,纳入因临床症状、PSA升高或前列腺癌机会性早期检测而接受mUS检查的男性。经验丰富的泌尿科医生在门诊环境中使用前列腺微超声风险识别(PRI-MUS)方案进行mUS评估,以识别可疑的csPCa病变(PRI-MUS评分≥3)。mUS结果为阴性的男性通过持续的电话随访和门诊随访,直至2023年10月,以评估他们的诊断和治疗途径。使用根据PSA水平、直肠指检结果、年龄和既往活检史调整的Cox回归模型,我们计算了队列中基于mUS结果的无活检生存(BFS,定义为从mUS到活检或最后随访的时间)、无癌生存(CFS)和临床显著无癌生存(csCFS)的风险比(HR)。
总体而言,共纳入425名男性。中位(IQR)年龄为66(59-72)岁,PSA水平为5.7(4.0-7.9)ng/mL,前列腺体积为44(31.5-62.1)mL,中位随访时间为39个月(27-53)。mUS在201/425(47.3%)名男性中发现了提示csPCa的病变。总体而言,mUS结果在224/425(52.7%)名男性中为阴性,其中207/224(92.4%)未进行后续的mpMRI检查,而22/224(9.8%)根据转诊医生的决定进行了mpMRI检查。后者在12/22例(54.5%)中检测到可疑病变,但活检仅证实其中2/12(16.7%)为csPCa。在mUS结果为阴性的男性中,192/224(85.7%)在随访期间避免了额外的活检。与mUS结果为阳性的男性相比,mUS结果为阴性的男性表现出更好的BFS(校正后HR:0.17;p<0.001)、CFS(校正后HR:0.12;p<0.001)和csCFS(校正后HR:0.09;p<0.001)生存率。
我们的研究结果表明,mUS可能会优化患者分层并改变前列腺癌筛查和诊断方案。在其他研究进行验证之前,更广泛地应用mUS可以优化资源分配,减少浪费,并避免进行额外的昂贵检查。