Fasulo Vittorio, Buffi NicolòMaria, Chiarelli Giuseppe, Lughezzani Giovanni, Zuradelli Monica, Ripamonti Carla Barbara, Barile Monica, Bianchi Paolo, Benetti Alessio, Paciotti Marco, Uleri Alessandro, Avolio Pier Paolo, Saita Alberto, Hurle Rodolfo, Maura Federica, Germagnoli Luca, Asselta Rosanna, Soldà Giulia, Casale Paolo, Lazzeri Massimo
Department of Biomedical Sciences Humanitas University Pieve Emanuele MI Italy.
Department of Urology IRCCS-Humanitas Research Hospital Rozzano MI Italy.
BJUI Compass. 2023 Jun 21;4(6):738-745. doi: 10.1002/bco2.252. eCollection 2023 Nov.
Abstract.
The aim of this study is to evaluate male awareness of developing prostate cancer (PCa) in families with germline DNA-repair genes (DRG) variants.
Data were collected from a prospective, monocentric cohort study. The study was conducted in a university hospital with a multidisciplinary approach to the patient (collaboration of the Departments of Oncology, Urology, Pathology, Radiology, and Medical Genetics Laboratory). We recruited healthy males, relatives of families of women with breast or ovarian cancer who tested positive for pathogenic variants (PVs) or likely pathogenic variants (LPVs) in DRGs. A dedicated PCa screening was designed and offered to men aged 35 to 69 years, based on early visits with digital rectal examination (DRE), prostate health index (PHI) measurement, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and, if necessary, targeted/systematic prostate biopsies. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the willingness of healthy men from families with a DRG variants detected in female relatives affected with breast and/or ovarian cancer to be tested for the presence of familial PVs. The secondary endpoints were the acceptance to participate if resulted positive and compliance with the screening programme.
Over 1256 families, of which 139 resulted positive for PVs in DRGs, we identified 378 'healthy' men aged between 35 and 69 years old. Two hundred sixty-one (69.0%) refused to be tested for DRG variants, 66 (17.5%) declared to have been previously tested, and 51 (13.5%) males were interested to be tested. Between those previously tested and those who accepted to be tested, 62 (53.0%) were positive for a DRG variant, and all of them accepted to participate in the subsequent surveillance steps. The main limitation is that is a single-centre study and a short follow-up.
All men tested positive for a DRG variants agreed to go under the surveillance scheme. However, only 31% of 'men at risk' (i.e., relative of a DRG variant carrier) expressed their willingness to be tested for the familial DRG variant. This observation strongly supports the urgent need to implement awareness of genetic risk for PCa within the male population.
摘要。
本研究旨在评估携带种系DNA修复基因(DRG)变异的家族中男性对患前列腺癌(PCa)的认知情况。
数据来自一项前瞻性单中心队列研究。该研究在一家大学医院开展,采用多学科方法诊治患者(肿瘤学、泌尿外科、病理学、放射学和医学遗传学实验室各科室协作)。我们招募了健康男性,他们是患有乳腺癌或卵巢癌的女性家族成员,这些女性在DRG中检测到致病性变异(PVs)或可能致病性变异(LPVs)。针对35至69岁男性设计并提供了专门的PCa筛查,包括早期直肠指检(DRE)、前列腺健康指数(PHI)测量、多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI),必要时进行靶向/系统性前列腺活检。主要终点是评估在患有乳腺癌和/或卵巢癌的女性亲属中检测到DRG变异的家族中,健康男性对检测家族性PVs的意愿。次要终点是检测结果呈阳性时参与的意愿以及对筛查方案的依从性。
在1256个家族中,139个家族的DRG中PVs呈阳性,我们确定了378名年龄在35至69岁之间的“健康”男性。261人(69.0%)拒绝检测DRG变异,66人(17.5%)宣称之前已接受检测,51人(13.5%)男性有兴趣接受检测。在之前接受检测的人和同意接受检测者中,62人(53.0%)的DRG变异呈阳性,他们都同意参与后续监测步骤。主要局限性在于这是一项单中心研究且随访时间短。
所有DRG变异检测呈阳性的男性都同意接受监测方案。然而,只有31%的“高危男性”(即DRG变异携带者的亲属)表示愿意检测家族性DRG变异。这一观察结果有力地支持了迫切需要在男性群体中提高对PCa遗传风险的认知。