• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肥胖患者的机器人辅助与腹腔镜结直肠手术:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery for patients with obesity: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

McKechnie Tyler, Khamar Jigish, Chu Christopher, Hatamnejad Amin, Jessani Ghazal, Lee Yung, Doumouras Aristithes, Amin Nalin, Hong Dennis, Eskicioglu Cagla

机构信息

Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2025 Apr;95(4):675-689. doi: 10.1111/ans.19319. Epub 2025 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1111/ans.19319
PMID:39876627
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11982662/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Obesity poses significant challenges in colorectal surgery, affecting operative difficulty and postoperative recovery. The choice of minimally invasive approach for this patient population remains a challenge during preoperative planning. This review aims to provide an updated synthesis of studies comparing laparoscopic and robotic approaches for adult patients with obesity undergoing colorectal surgery.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL were searched up to August 2023. Articles were included if they compared laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgery outcomes in adults with obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m). Outcomes included overall postoperative morbidity, conversion to laparotomy, and operative time. Inverse variance random-effects meta-analyses were used to pool effect estimates.

RESULTS

After screening 2187 citations, 10 observational studies were included with 3281 patients with obesity undergoing robotic surgery (mean age: 58.1 years, female: 43.9%) and 11 369 patients with obesity undergoing laparoscopic surgery (mean age: 58 years, female: 53.2%). Robotic surgery resulted in longer operative times (MD 46.71 min, 95% CI 33.50-59.92, p < 0.01, I = 93.79%) with statistically significant reductions in conversions to laparotomy (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.39-0.65, p < 0.01, I = 67.15%). No significant differences were seen in postoperative morbidity (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.82-1.08, p = 0.40, I = 36.08%).

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that robotic colorectal surgery in patients with obesity may reduce the risk for conversion to laparotomy, but at the expense of increased operative times and with no overt benefits in postoperative outcomes. Further high quality randomized controlled trials assessing the utility of robotic surgery in patients with obesity undergoing colorectal surgery are warranted.

摘要

背景

肥胖给结直肠手术带来了重大挑战,影响手术难度和术后恢复。对于这一患者群体,在术前规划中选择微创方法仍然是一项挑战。本综述旨在提供关于比较腹腔镜和机器人手术方法用于肥胖成年患者结直肠手术的研究的最新综合分析。

方法

检索截至2023年8月的MEDLINE、Embase和CENTRAL数据库。纳入比较肥胖成年患者(BMI≥30kg/m²)腹腔镜和机器人结直肠手术结果的文章。结果包括总体术后发病率、中转开腹率和手术时间。采用逆方差随机效应荟萃分析来汇总效应估计值。

结果

在筛选2187篇文献后,纳入了10项观察性研究,其中3281例肥胖患者接受机器人手术(平均年龄:58.1岁,女性:43.9%),11369例肥胖患者接受腹腔镜手术(平均年龄:58岁,女性:53.2%)。机器人手术导致手术时间更长(MD 46.71分钟,95%CI 33.50 - 59.92,p < 0.01,I² = 93.79%),中转开腹率有统计学显著降低(RR 0.50,95%CI 0.39 - 0.65,p < 0.01,I² = 67.15%)。术后发病率无显著差异(RR 0.94,95%CI 0.82 - 1.08,p = 0.40,I² = 36.08%)。

结论

这些数据表明,肥胖患者的机器人结直肠手术可能降低中转开腹的风险,但代价是手术时间增加,且术后结果无明显益处。有必要进行进一步高质量的随机对照试验,以评估机器人手术在肥胖患者结直肠手术中的效用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f7a/11982662/cc2e7a9cc139/ANS-95-675-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f7a/11982662/bec83acec4e1/ANS-95-675-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f7a/11982662/7bf62f2c1c9e/ANS-95-675-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f7a/11982662/fd23f6b18748/ANS-95-675-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f7a/11982662/cc2e7a9cc139/ANS-95-675-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f7a/11982662/bec83acec4e1/ANS-95-675-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f7a/11982662/7bf62f2c1c9e/ANS-95-675-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f7a/11982662/fd23f6b18748/ANS-95-675-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f7a/11982662/cc2e7a9cc139/ANS-95-675-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery for patients with obesity: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.肥胖患者的机器人辅助与腹腔镜结直肠手术:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
ANZ J Surg. 2025 Apr;95(4):675-689. doi: 10.1111/ans.19319. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
2
Minimally invasive surgical techniques versus open myomectomy for uterine fibroids.子宫肌瘤的微创手术技术与开腹子宫肌瘤切除术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 21;2014(10):CD004638. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004638.pub3.
3
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in high-risk patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.高危患者结直肠癌的机器人辅助手术与腹腔镜手术:系统评价与荟萃分析
Tech Coloproctol. 2025 Apr 8;29(1):98. doi: 10.1007/s10151-025-03141-3.
4
Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for prevention of postoperative pain in women undergoing laparoscopic and robotic gynaecological surgery.腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞预防腹腔镜及机器人辅助妇科手术女性患者术后疼痛
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 3;4(4):CD015145. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015145.pub2.
5
Pre-operative endometrial thinning agents before endometrial destruction for heavy menstrual bleeding.对于月经过多患者,在进行子宫内膜破坏术前使用的术前子宫内膜减薄剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 15;2013(11):CD010241. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010241.pub2.
6
Supraglottic airway devices versus tracheal intubation for airway management during general anaesthesia in obese patients.肥胖患者全身麻醉期间声门上气道装置与气管插管用于气道管理的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 9;2013(9):CD010105. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010105.pub2.
7
Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair.经腹腹膜前(TAPP)与完全腹膜外(TEP)腹腔镜技术治疗腹股沟疝修补术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 4;7(7):CD004703. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004703.pub3.
8
Total intravenous anaesthesia versus inhalational anaesthesia for adults undergoing transabdominal robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery.成人经腹机器人辅助腹腔镜手术中全静脉麻醉与吸入麻醉的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 4;4(4):CD011387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011387.pub2.
9
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
10
Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer.腹腔镜及机器人辅助与开放根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD009625. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Does robotic assisted surgery mitigate obesity related systemic inflammatory response and clinical outcomes in left sided colorectal cancer resections?机器人辅助手术能否减轻左侧结直肠癌切除术中与肥胖相关的全身炎症反应及改善临床结局?
J Robot Surg. 2025 Mar 5;19(1):98. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02261-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic docking time with the Hugo™ RAS system in gynecologic surgery: a procedure independent learning curve using the cumulative summation analysis (CUSUM).机器人对接时间与妇科手术中的 Hugo™ RAS 系统:使用累积和分析(CUSUM)的独立程序学习曲线。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):2547-2554. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01693-w. Epub 2023 Aug 5.
2
Outcomes of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in morbidly obese patients: A propensity score-matched analysis of the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample.机器人辅助手术与腹腔镜手术治疗肥胖患者结直肠癌的结局:美国全国住院患者样本的倾向评分匹配分析。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Sep;38(9):1510-1519. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16212. Epub 2023 May 16.
3
Fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized trials in comparing laparoscopic versus robotic abdominopelvic surgeries.
随机试验中比较腹腔镜与机器人腹盆腔手术的统计学显著发现的脆弱性。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4270-4278. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10063-4. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
4
Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy node retrieval in the obese population.肥胖人群中行机器人右半结肠切除术与腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的淋巴结检出效果比较。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1349-1355. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01529-7. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
5
Comparison of Laparoscopic Versus Robot-Assisted Surgery for Rectal Cancers: The COLRAR Randomized Controlled Trial.腹腔镜与机器人辅助手术治疗直肠癌的比较:COLRAR 随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2023 Jul 1;278(1):31-38. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005788. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
6
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal surgery in obese and morbidly obese patients: ACS-NSQIP analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜直肠手术治疗肥胖和病态肥胖患者:ACS-NSQIP 分析。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):637-643. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01462-1. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
7
Impact of surgeon and hospital factors on length of stay after colorectal surgery systematic review.外科医生和医院因素对结直肠手术后住院时间的影响:系统评价。
BJS Open. 2022 Sep 2;6(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac110.
8
Robotic colon surgery in obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肥胖患者的机器人结肠手术:系统评价与荟萃分析
ANZ J Surg. 2023 Jan;93(1-2):35-41. doi: 10.1111/ans.17749. Epub 2022 May 3.
9
Assessing the role of robotic proctectomy in obese patients: a contemporary NSQIP analysis.评估肥胖患者行机器人直肠切除术的作用:一项当代 NSQIP 分析。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Dec;16(6):1391-1399. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01380-2. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
10
Robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients in terms of recovery time: a monocentric experience.机器人与腹腔镜结直肠手术在老年患者恢复时间方面的比较:一项单中心经验。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Aug;16(4):981-987. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01332-2. Epub 2021 Nov 7.