Noble Daniel W A, Xirocostas Zoe A, Wu Nicholas C, Martinig April Robin, Almeida Rafaela A, Bairos-Novak Kevin R, Balti Heikel, Bertram Michael G, Bliard Louis, Brand Jack A, Byrne Ilha, Chan Ying-Chi, Clink Dena Jane, Corbel Quentin, Correia Ricardo A, Crawford-Ash Jordann, Culina Antica, D'Bastiani Elvira, Deme Gideon G, de Souza Leite Melina, Dhellemmes Félicie, Dimri Shreya, Drobniak Szymek M, Elsy Alexander D, Everingham Susan E, Gascoigne Samuel J L, Grainger Matthew J, Hossack Gavin C, Hovstad Knut Anders, Ivimey-Cook Edward R, Jones Matt Lloyd, Kačergytė Ineta, Küstner Georg, Leibold Dalton C, Mair Magdalena M, Martin Jake, Mizuno Ayumi, Moodie Iain R, Moreau David, O'Dea Rose E, Orr James A, Paquet Matthieu, Parajuli Rabindra, Pick Joel L, Pottier Patrice, Purgar Marija, Recio Pablo, Roche Dominique G, Royauté Raphaël, Shafiei Sabet Saeed, Segovia Julio M G, Silva Inês, Sánchez-Tójar Alfredo, Soares Bruno E, Szabo Birgit, Takola Elina, Thoré Eli S J, Timilsina Bishnu, van Dis Natalie E, Verberk Wilco C E P, Vriend Stefan J G, Wild Kristoffer H, Williams Coralie, Yang Yefeng, Nakagawa Shinichi, Lagisz Malgorzata
Division of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2600, Australia.
School of Life Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2007, Australia.
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Jan;292(2039):20241487. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.1487. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
Publishing preprints is quickly becoming commonplace in ecology and evolutionary biology. Preprints can facilitate the rapid sharing of scientific knowledge establishing precedence and enabling feedback from the research community before peer review. Yet, significant barriers to preprint use exist, including language barriers, a lack of understanding about the benefits of preprints and a lack of diversity in the types of research outputs accepted (e.g. reports). Community-driven preprint initiatives can allow a research community to come together to break down these barriers to improve equity and coverage of global knowledge. Here, we explore the first preprints uploaded to ( = 1216), a community-driven preprint server for ecologists and evolutionary biologists, to characterize preprint use in ecology, evolution and conservation. Our perspective piece highlights some of the unique initiatives that has taken to break down barriers to scientific publishing by exploring the composition of articles, how gender and career stage influence preprint use, whether preprints are associated with greater open science practices (e.g. code and data sharing) and tracking preprint publication outcomes. Our analysis identifies areas that we still need to improve upon but highlights how community-driven initiatives, such as , can play a crucial role in shaping publishing practices in biology.
在生态学和进化生物学领域,发表预印本正迅速变得司空见惯。预印本能够促进科学知识的快速共享,确立优先权,并在同行评审之前获得研究界的反馈。然而,预印本的使用仍存在重大障碍,包括语言障碍、对预印本益处缺乏了解以及所接受的研究成果类型缺乏多样性(例如报告)。社区驱动的预印本倡议能够让研究社区团结起来,打破这些障碍,以提高全球知识的公平性和覆盖面。在这里,我们探讨了上传到 ( = 1216)的首批预印本,这是一个由社区驱动的面向生态学家和进化生物学家的预印本服务器,旨在描述生态学、进化和保护领域中预印本的使用情况。我们的观点文章通过探讨文章的构成、性别和职业阶段如何影响预印本的使用、预印本是否与更多的开放科学实践(例如代码和数据共享)相关联以及追踪预印本的发表成果,突出了 为打破科学出版障碍所采取的一些独特举措。我们的分析确定了仍需改进的领域,但强调了像 这样的社区驱动倡议如何能够在塑造生物学出版实践中发挥关键作用。