Mastracci Julia C, Saltzman Eliana B, Bonvillain Kirby W, Drexelius Katherine D, Woodside Julie C, Chadderdon R Christopher, Waters Peter M, Gaston R Glenn
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
J Hand Microsurg. 2024 Nov 13;17(1):100176. doi: 10.1016/j.jham.2024.100176. eCollection 2025 Jan.
Transition to outpatient surgery has grown with an emphasis on delivery of safe, high-quality medical care. The purpose of this study is to compare 90-day emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, and complications between patients undergoing outpatient versus inpatient pollicization surgery.
A single institution database was queried for primary thumb pollicization from 2010 to 2022 in patients under 18 years of age. Standard demographic data, comorbidities, surgical information, and discharge disposition were collected. Primary outcome measures were complications including ED visits, unplanned reoperations and hospital readmissions within 90-days of index procedure.
Twenty-seven patients underwent pollicization surgery. Twenty patients were outpatient surgery while 7 had postoperative hospital admission, defined as an overnight hospital stay. The outpatient cohort had no major postoperative complications including no ED visits, reoperations or readmissions within 90 days of index procedure. One outpatient experienced swelling around bilateral thumb pin sites without infection or vascular compromise. One inpatient represented to the ED within 90 days of surgery for bilateral hand cellulitis.All patients with ASA I classification were performed outpatient. Three of 7 inpatients (43 %) had congenital heart disease versus 5 of the 20 (25 %) outpatients. There was a trend that inpatients were younger than the outpatient cohort (19 vs. 33 months). The average length of procedure in the inpatient cohort was significantly longer than the outpatient cohort (237 vs. 173 min). Pollicizations performed between 2017 and 2022 were more likely to be outpatient than those performed between 2010 and 2016.
On properly selected patients, outpatient pollicization appears to be a safe option. Patients with longer operative times were more likely to require postoperative hospital admission. Over the study years evaluated at our institution, pollicization procedures were more likely to be performed outpatient, reflecting an evolution of our practice.
Level III, retrospective cohort study.
随着对提供安全、高质量医疗服务的重视,门诊手术的应用越来越广泛。本研究的目的是比较接受门诊与住院拇指再造手术的患者在90天内的急诊科就诊情况、再入院情况和并发症。
查询单一机构数据库中2010年至2022年18岁以下患者的原发性拇指再造手术信息。收集标准人口统计学数据、合并症、手术信息和出院处置情况。主要结局指标为并发症,包括在索引手术90天内的急诊科就诊、计划外再次手术和住院再入院。
27例患者接受了拇指再造手术。20例为门诊手术,7例术后住院,即过夜住院。门诊组无重大术后并发症,包括在索引手术90天内无急诊科就诊、再次手术或再入院。1例门诊患者双侧拇指针孔周围出现肿胀,但无感染或血管受损。1例住院患者在手术后90天内因双侧手部蜂窝织炎到急诊科就诊。所有ASA I级分类的患者均进行了门诊手术。7例住院患者中有3例(43%)患有先天性心脏病,而20例门诊患者中有5例(25%)患有先天性心脏病。有一个趋势是住院患者比门诊组患者年轻(19个月对33个月)。住院组的平均手术时间明显长于门诊组(237分钟对1