• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国 successive 城市住房改革中住房 tenure 的社会结构变化。 (注:“successive”常见释义为“连续的、相继的” ;“tenure”常见释义为“任期、保有期、使用权” ,这里housing tenure结合语境可理解为住房保有形式等,但整体译文可能因部分专业术语理解不同稍显模糊,可根据更详细背景知识完善)

The changing social structure of housing tenures through China's successive urban housing reforms.

作者信息

Cui Junru, Arundel Rowan

机构信息

Department of Geography, Planning and International Development Studies, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Hous Stud. 2024 Mar 20;40(2):279-301. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2024.2329138. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1080/02673037.2024.2329138
PMID:39876985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11771467/
Abstract

Housing system transitions often involve successive but overlapping periods of reform with crucial implications for housing inequality dynamics. Building on welfare regime and market transition discussions, this paper considers how the shifting roles of the state, market, and family in housing provision in China have led to changing housing tenures and differentiated access to them between populations with varying socio-economic resources. Drawing on two national datasets, our analyses reveal that the four decades of reforms dramatically upended urban China's tenure structure with market homeownership becoming the dominant tenure. Nevertheless, we find a substantial and increasing role of the family in housing provision, especially for people with fewer socio-economic resources. The advantages associated with better institutional resources under the previous socialist housing system not only persist in accessing state-provided tenures but have also extended their influence into market housing. Meanwhile, homeownership outcomes have become increasingly polarized among groups with different income and education levels. Our findings expose the reproduction and apparent amplification of tenure-related housing inequalities over the period of housing regime transformation.

摘要

住房制度转型通常涉及连续但重叠的改革阶段,这对住房不平等动态具有至关重要的影响。基于福利制度和市场转型的讨论,本文探讨了中国住房供应中政府、市场和家庭角色的转变如何导致住房保有形式的变化,以及不同社会经济资源群体在获取住房保有形式方面的差异。利用两个全国性数据集,我们的分析表明,四十年的改革极大地颠覆了中国城市的住房保有结构,市场自有住房成为主导的住房保有形式。然而,我们发现家庭在住房供应中的作用显著且不断增强,尤其是对于社会经济资源较少的人群。在前社会主义住房制度下与更好的制度资源相关的优势,不仅在获取国家提供的住房保有形式方面持续存在,而且还将其影响力扩展到了市场住房领域。与此同时,自有住房的结果在不同收入和教育水平的群体之间变得越来越两极分化。我们的研究结果揭示了在住房制度转型期间,与住房保有形式相关的住房不平等的重现和明显加剧。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08e5/11771467/dab12b73d64f/CHOS_A_2329138_F0002_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08e5/11771467/43c58ff032b9/CHOS_A_2329138_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08e5/11771467/dab12b73d64f/CHOS_A_2329138_F0002_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08e5/11771467/43c58ff032b9/CHOS_A_2329138_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08e5/11771467/dab12b73d64f/CHOS_A_2329138_F0002_C.jpg

相似文献

1
The changing social structure of housing tenures through China's successive urban housing reforms.中国 successive 城市住房改革中住房 tenure 的社会结构变化。 (注:“successive”常见释义为“连续的、相继的” ;“tenure”常见释义为“任期、保有期、使用权” ,这里housing tenure结合语境可理解为住房保有形式等,但整体译文可能因部分专业术语理解不同稍显模糊,可根据更详细背景知识完善)
Hous Stud. 2024 Mar 20;40(2):279-301. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2024.2329138. eCollection 2025.
2
The downside of marketization: a multilevel analysis of housing tenure and types in reform-era urban China.市场化的弊端:对改革时期中国城市住房产权与类型的多层次分析
Soc Sci Res. 2015 Jan;49:126-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.07.001. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
3
The Winners in China's Urban Housing Reform.中国城镇住房改革的赢家。
Hous Stud. 2010;25(1):101-117. doi: 10.1080/02673030903240660.
4
Intergenerational wealth transmission and homeownership in Europe-a comparative perspective.欧洲的代际财富传承与住房拥有:比较视角
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 28;17(9):e0274647. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274647. eCollection 2022.
5
Social integration as a mediator of the association between housing tenure and health inequalities among China's migrants: A housing discrimination perspective.社会融合在中国流动人口住房权属与健康不平等关联中的中介作用:基于住房歧视视角
SSM Popul Health. 2024 Jan 26;25:101614. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101614. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Income-related health inequality in urban China (1991-2015): The role of homeownership and housing conditions.中国城市收入相关健康不平等(1991-2015):住房产权与住房条件的作用。
Health Place. 2022 Jan;73:102743. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102743. Epub 2022 Jan 16.
7
The distribution of housing wealth in 16 European countries: accounting for institutional differences.16个欧洲国家住房财富的分布:考虑制度差异
J Hous Built Environ. 2017;32(4):625-647. doi: 10.1007/s10901-016-9540-3. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
8
Beyond the state/market dichotomy: Institutional innovations in China's electricity industry reform.超越国家/市场二分法:中国电力行业改革中的制度创新。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Jun 15;264:110306. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110306. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
9
Study on the China's real interest rate after including housing price factor into CPI.考虑房价因素后中国实际利率的研究
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 11;18(8):e0290079. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290079. eCollection 2023.
10
Reproduction of social inequality through housing: A three-generational study from Norway.住房领域社会不平等的再现:来自挪威的三代人研究。
Soc Sci Res. 2019 Feb;78:119-136. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.12.016. Epub 2018 Dec 10.

本文引用的文献

1
The downside of marketization: a multilevel analysis of housing tenure and types in reform-era urban China.市场化的弊端:对改革时期中国城市住房产权与类型的多层次分析
Soc Sci Res. 2015 Jan;49:126-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.07.001. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
2
Access to Housing in Urban China.中国城市的住房可及性
Int J Urban Reg Res. 2009 Dec;33(4):914-935. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00848.x.
3
Locating Chinese urban housing policy in an international context.在国际背景下定位中国城市住房政策。
Urban Stud. 2010;47(14):2965-982. doi: 10.1177/0042098009360219.