Guan Xin, Duan A-Min, Xin Gong-Kai, Oyebode Jan, Liu Yu
School of Nursing, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing (LKS) Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 14;15:1523501. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1523501. eCollection 2024.
There is a gap between the principles of person-centred dementia care and their actual implementation. However, scoping reviews of the barriers and facilitators to implementing person-centred dementia care in long-term care facilities for Western countries and Asian countries are lacking.
To identify and compare the barriers and facilitators to implementing person-centred dementia care in long-term care facilities between Western and Asian countries.
In line with Arksey and O'Malley's methodology, a scoping review was conducted and is reported following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Nine English language databases and three Chinese databases were searched to identify qualitative and quantitative research studies published in English and Chinese. Thematic analysis was used to summarise and characterize the barriers and facilitators to implementing person-centred dementia care in long-term care facilities for Western and Asian countries.
Thirty-three studies were included. Over half were conducted in Western countries (n =20). Barriers and facilitators were grouped under four high level themes: Nursing and care staff factors, people living with dementia and family factors, organizational factors, and resource factors. Inadequate knowledge of person-centred care, staffing shortages, time constraints, and low wages were the principal barriers to implementing person-centred dementia care in both Western and Asian countries.
The findings indicate that staff encounter numerous obstacles and needs in implementing person-centred care for people living with dementia in long-term care settings. Educational levels of nursing staff in Western countries were generally higher compared to Asian countries. Additionally, work-related injuries and stigma associated with dementia care presented unique challenges for nursing staff in Asia and were not cited in Western studies. Conversely, family-related factors were more frequently and elaborately cited as influencing person-centred dementia care in Western long-term care facilities. Moreover, Asian studies identified a significant lack of educational training support for person-centred dementia care, as well as shortages in staffing and poor availability of personalized, home-like environments.
以患者为中心的痴呆症护理原则与其实际实施之间存在差距。然而,对于西方国家和亚洲国家在长期护理机构中实施以患者为中心的痴呆症护理的障碍和促进因素,缺乏相关的综述。
识别并比较西方国家和亚洲国家在长期护理机构中实施以患者为中心的痴呆症护理的障碍和促进因素。
按照阿克西和奥马利的方法进行综述,并依据PRISMA-ScR指南进行报告。检索了九个英文数据库和三个中文数据库,以识别用英文和中文发表的定性和定量研究。采用主题分析法总结和描述西方国家和亚洲国家在长期护理机构中实施以患者为中心的痴呆症护理的障碍和促进因素。
纳入了33项研究。超过一半的研究在西方国家进行(n = 20)。障碍和促进因素被归为四个高层次主题:护理人员因素、痴呆症患者及其家庭因素、组织因素和资源因素。在西方国家和亚洲国家,对以患者为中心的护理知识不足、人员短缺、时间限制和低工资都是实施以患者为中心的痴呆症护理的主要障碍。
研究结果表明,在长期护理环境中,工作人员在为痴呆症患者实施以患者为中心的护理时遇到了众多障碍和需求。与亚洲国家相比,西方国家护理人员的教育水平普遍较高。此外,与痴呆症护理相关的工伤和耻辱感给亚洲的护理人员带来了独特的挑战,而西方研究中未提及这些。相反,在西方长期护理机构中,家庭相关因素被更频繁、更详细地引述为影响以患者为中心的痴呆症护理的因素。此外,亚洲的研究发现,以患者为中心的痴呆症护理严重缺乏教育培训支持,人员短缺,且缺乏个性化、类似家庭环境。