Backman Annica, Ahnlund Petra, Lövheim Hugo, Edvardsson David
Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Department of Social work, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Int J Older People Nurs. 2024 Jan;19(1):e12581. doi: 10.1111/opn.12581. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
Research suggests that person-centred care can be beneficially implemented and sustained, even though barriers remain that prevent uptake in clinical practice. Understanding barriers to person-centred care seems important, as this has an impact on care practices and resident outcomes. Moreover, there is limited knowledge about nursing home managers' descriptions of barriers when leading person-centred care.
To explore barriers to leading person-centred care as narrated by nursing home managers.
A descriptive qualitative design was used to collect data using individual interviews with 12 nursing home managers in highly person-centred nursing homes. Data were analysed using content analysis.
Multi-level barriers to leading person-centred care were identified on the (1) person level, (2) team level and (3) organisational level. Placing professional and family considerations ahead of resident considerations was described as a barrier on the personal level (1). Also, staff's divergent care values, processes, and priorities together with turnover and low foundational knowledge were identified as barriers on the team level (2). On an organisational level (3), constrained finances, functional building design and group level rostering were identified as barriers.
Multi-level barriers influence nursing home managers' ability to lead and promote person-centred care. Promoting the development of person-centred practices requires efforts to eliminate barriers on person, team and organisational level.
Identifying and overcoming barriers at various levels in nursing home care has the potential to promote person-centred practices. This study can inform stakeholders and policymakers of challenges and complexities in person-centred practices. Multi-level strategies are needed to target challenges at person-, team- and organisational level when striving to develop person-centred care.
研究表明,以患者为中心的护理能够得到有益的实施和维持,尽管仍然存在阻碍其在临床实践中应用的障碍。了解以患者为中心的护理的障碍似乎很重要,因为这会影响护理实践和患者的治疗效果。此外,关于养老院管理人员在引领以患者为中心的护理时对障碍的描述,相关知识有限。
探讨养老院管理人员所讲述的引领以患者为中心的护理的障碍。
采用描述性定性设计,通过对12所高度以患者为中心的养老院的管理人员进行个人访谈来收集数据。使用内容分析法对数据进行分析。
在(1)个人层面、(2)团队层面和(3)组织层面确定了引领以患者为中心的护理的多层次障碍。在个人层面(1),将专业和家庭因素置于患者因素之前被描述为一种障碍。此外,员工不同的护理价值观、流程和优先事项,以及人员流动和基础知识不足被确定为团队层面(2)的障碍。在组织层面(3),资金受限、功能建筑设计和团队层面的排班被确定为障碍。
多层次障碍影响养老院管理人员引领和推广以患者为中心的护理的能力。促进以患者为中心的护理实践的发展需要努力消除个人、团队和组织层面的障碍。
识别并克服养老院护理各个层面的障碍有可能促进以患者为中心的护理实践。本研究可以让利益相关者和政策制定者了解以患者为中心的护理实践中的挑战和复杂性。在努力发展以患者为中心的护理时,需要采取多层次策略来应对个人、团队和组织层面的挑战。