Suppr超能文献

针对健康老年人的认知干预:一项系统的元综述。

Cognitive interventions for healthy older adults: A systematic meta-review.

作者信息

Velloso Vitória, Latgé-Tovar Sofia, Bomilcar Iris, Mograbi Daniel C

机构信息

Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Department of Psychology, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

PhD Program in Neuroscience, Autonomous University of Madrid-Cajal Institute, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2025 Jan-Mar;25(1):100538. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100538. Epub 2025 Jan 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

With increasing global life expectancy, cognitive interventions hold promise in mitigating cognitive decline and fostering healthy aging. Despite the demand for evidence-based interventions, there have been few attempts to summarize existing evidence. This study aims to assess the effectiveness and feasibility of unimodal and multimodal cognitive interventions for cognitively healthy older adults.

METHOD

Systematic meta-review, selecting articles from four databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Quality assessment carried out with AMSTAR2. Findings were summarized and discussed narratively.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine articles were included, with 21 meta-analyses and 18 qualitative systematic reviews. The total number of reviews was 38 for cognitive training, 4 for cognitive stimulation, and 1 for multicomponent interventions. Most reviews had low or critically low quality.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevailing evidence supports cognitive training. Continued research into cognitive stimulation and multicomponent protocols is encouraged. Longer follow-ups are important for identifying combined and clinically significant results. Rigorous risk of bias and quality assessment is necessary to enhance the evidence base.

摘要

目的

随着全球预期寿命的增加,认知干预在减轻认知衰退和促进健康老龄化方面具有前景。尽管对循证干预措施有需求,但很少有人尝试总结现有证据。本研究旨在评估针对认知健康的老年人进行单峰和多峰认知干预的有效性和可行性。

方法

系统的元分析综述,从四个数据库中选择文章:PubMed、科学网、Embase和Cochrane图书馆。使用AMSTAR2进行质量评估。研究结果进行了总结并进行了叙述性讨论。

结果

纳入39篇文章,其中21篇为元分析,18篇为定性系统评价。认知训练的综述总数为38篇,认知刺激的为4篇,多成分干预的为1篇。大多数综述的质量较低或极低。

结论

现有证据支持认知训练。鼓励继续对认知刺激和多成分方案进行研究。更长时间的随访对于确定综合的和具有临床意义的结果很重要。严格的偏倚风险和质量评估对于加强证据基础是必要的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f13f/11770512/df137ebcb5fc/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验