Garau Javier
Department of Medicine, Clínica Rotger Quironsalud, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2025 Apr 1;38(2):107-113. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000001098. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
Optimal duration of therapy in SSTIs - a heterogeneous group of infections - remains unknown. The advances in knowledge of antibiotic duration of treatment in selected SSTIs that can impact clinical practice and published in the last 18 months are reviewed.
Recent evidence indicates that few patients receive guideline concordant empiric antibiotics and appropriate duration in the United States, although this likely can be extrapolated to other countries. One of the most commonly identified opportunities to improve antibiotic stewardship is duration of therapy more than 10 days. The long-standing debate regarding the significance of abscess size and its impact on clinical response to antibiotics, following proper drainage, is increasingly shifting towards the conclusion that abscess size is not directly associated with cure.In obese patients with SSTI, there is no benefit to longer antibiotic durations for SSTIs in patients with obesity, and it appears that longer antibiotic duration of therapy was associated with increased treatment failure. In diabetic foot infections (DFO), two randomized studies suggest that in the presence of osteomyelitis, the total duration of antibiotic therapy for patients treated nonsurgically does not need to be more than 6 weeks. In a prospective, randomized, noninferiority, pilot trial, patients with DFO who underwent surgical debridement and received either a 3-week or 6-week course of antibiotic therapy had similar outcomes and antibiotic-related adverse events. In patients with necrotizing soft tissue infections, successive observational studies clearly suggest that short duration of antibiotic treatment after NSTI source control is as well tolerated and effective as a longer course. It appears that 48 h would be enough. The possibility of fixed versus individualized approaches to therapy for common bacterial infections, including SSTIs merits to be considered seriously. Fully individualized therapy may be an ideal approach to maximize the benefits and minimize the harms of antimicrobials. Much more work is needed before this strategy becomes feasible.
There is increasing evidence that shorter duration of treatment is better in different types of SSTIs. Paradoxically, evaluation of real-life clinical practice indicates that long treatments continue to be commonly given to this population.
皮肤和软组织感染(SSTIs)是一组异质性感染,最佳治疗疗程仍不明确。本文综述了过去18个月发表的、能影响临床实践的特定SSTIs抗生素治疗疗程方面的知识进展。
近期证据表明,在美国,很少有患者接受符合指南的经验性抗生素治疗及合适疗程,不过这可能也适用于其他国家。改善抗生素管理最常发现的机会之一是治疗疗程超过10天。关于脓肿大小的意义及其在适当引流后对抗生素临床反应的影响这一长期争论,越来越倾向于得出脓肿大小与治愈无直接关联的结论。在肥胖的SSTIs患者中,延长抗生素疗程并无益处,而且似乎延长抗生素治疗疗程与治疗失败增加有关。在糖尿病足感染(DFO)中,两项随机研究表明,存在骨髓炎时,非手术治疗患者的抗生素总疗程无需超过6周。在一项前瞻性、随机、非劣效性试点试验中,接受手术清创并接受3周或6周抗生素治疗疗程的DFO患者,其结局和抗生素相关不良事件相似。在坏死性软组织感染患者中,连续的观察性研究明确表明,坏死性软组织感染(NSTI)源控制后短疗程抗生素治疗与长疗程一样耐受良好且有效。似乎48小时就足够了。对于包括SSTIs在内的常见细菌感染,固定疗程与个体化治疗方法的可能性值得认真考虑。完全个体化治疗可能是使抗菌药物益处最大化和危害最小化的理想方法。在该策略可行之前,还需要做更多工作。
越来越多的证据表明,不同类型的SSTIs治疗疗程越短越好。矛盾的是,对现实临床实践的评估表明,这一人群仍普遍接受长时间治疗。