Greenlee Geoffrey M, Collins Jessica L, Leroux Brian, Allareddy Veerasathpurush, Jolley Cameron, Shin Kyungsup, Vermette Michael, Huang Greg J
Angle Orthod. 2025 Mar 1;95(2):149-156. doi: 10.2319/070224-518.1.
To investigate whether extractions in adult anterior openbite (AOB) patients lead to improved treatment outcomes and better short-term stability.
Records of extraction (EXT) and nonextraction (NE) adult patients were identified from all patients treated with fixed appliances through the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. Photographic Openbite Severity Index was used to assess treatment success and stability. Skeletal, dental, and soft tissue treatment outcomes were evaluated using cephalometric analysis.
Pretreatment and posttreatment records were collected for 115 patients. Thirty-three were treated with extractions; 82 were treated without extractions. The EXT group was younger, more crowded, and had less previous orthodontic treatment. Success rate of AOB correction in the EXT group was slightly higher (97%) than the NE group (92%) but not statistically different. No significant differences were observed in skeletal outcomes. The EXT group exhibited more lingual tipping and posterior movement of maxillary and mandibular incisors and less extrusion of mandibular incisors. Dental changes in the EXT group were associated with increased nasolabial angle and lip retraction. The small number of patients with AOB relapse did not provide enough power to identify differences in stability between the two groups.
Orthodontists have high success correcting AOB with or without extractions. The EXT group displayed more retraction and lingual tipping of incisors as well as increased retraction of soft tissues. Stability of AOB closure was more than 90% for both groups after 1 year, with marginal increases in stability after extractions.
研究成年前牙开(AOB)患者拔牙是否能带来更好的治疗效果和短期稳定性。
通过国家基于牙科实践的研究网络,从所有接受固定矫治器治疗的患者中识别出拔牙(EXT)和非拔牙(NE)成年患者的记录。使用摄影开严重程度指数评估治疗成功率和稳定性。采用头影测量分析评估骨骼、牙齿和软组织的治疗效果。
收集了115例患者的治疗前和治疗后记录。33例接受拔牙治疗;82例未接受拔牙治疗。拔牙组患者年龄更小,牙列更拥挤,且既往正畸治疗较少。拔牙组AOB矫正成功率略高于非拔牙组(97%比92%),但无统计学差异。骨骼治疗效果方面未观察到显著差异。拔牙组上颌和下颌切牙出现更多舌倾和向后移动,下颌切牙伸长较少。拔牙组的牙齿变化与鼻唇角增加和唇部后缩有关。少量AOB复发患者不足以确定两组在稳定性上的差异。
正畸医生采用拔牙或不拔牙矫治AOB均有较高成功率。拔牙组切牙表现出更多的内收和舌倾以及软组织更多的后缩。两组AOB关闭1年后的稳定性均超过90%,拔牙后稳定性略有增加。