• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解独特的患者因果单一论和患者报告的结果。

Understanding the unique patient-causal singularism and patient reported outcomes.

作者信息

Meadows K A, Reaney M

机构信息

Health Outcomes Insights Ltd, Oxfordshire, UK.

IQVIA Patient Centered Solutions, Reading, UK.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2025 May;34(5):1221-1231. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03905-2. Epub 2025 Jan 29.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-025-03905-2
PMID:39881063
Abstract

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) now play a significant role in randomized control trials (RCTs) providing the basis for efficacy or safety endpoints. Most PROM data is quantitative and is summarized at the group level. Whilst PROM data is informative in providing the aggregated patient perspective on disease and interventions, it provides little information about the patients' individual experiences. For this, qualitative 'case study' research is needed. However, qualitative case-study research has traditionally not been considered as robust for establishing causal inference due to its singular nature and lack of quantifiable findings. The focus of this paper was to advance a proposal as to how to produce a single mixed-methods case analysis of an individual's experiences with treatment from PROM and narrative data that can be used in causal inference research; so-called "Causal singularism".

摘要

患者报告结局测量(PROMs)如今在随机对照试验(RCTs)中发挥着重要作用,为疗效或安全性终点提供依据。大多数PROM数据是定量的,并在组水平上进行汇总。虽然PROM数据在提供患者对疾病和干预措施的总体看法方面具有参考价值,但它几乎没有提供关于患者个体经历的信息。为此,需要进行定性的“案例研究”。然而,由于定性案例研究的单一性和缺乏可量化的结果,传统上并不认为它在建立因果推断方面具有足够的说服力。本文的重点是提出一项建议,即如何对来自PROM和叙事数据的个体治疗经历进行单一的混合方法案例分析,以用于因果推断研究;即所谓的“因果单一论”。

相似文献

1
Understanding the unique patient-causal singularism and patient reported outcomes.理解独特的患者因果单一论和患者报告的结果。
Qual Life Res. 2025 May;34(5):1221-1231. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03905-2. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Tailored or adapted interventions for adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and at least one other long-term condition: a mixed methods review.针对患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病和至少一种其他长期疾病的成年人的定制或改编干预措施:一项混合方法综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 26;7(7):CD013384. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013384.pub2.
5
Utilization and Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Randomized Clinical Trials of Acute Stroke (2010-2020).急性卒中随机临床试验中患者报告结局指标的应用与报告(2010 - 2020年)
Stroke. 2024 May;55(5):1174-1180. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.046209. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
6
Quality improvements of healthcare trajectories by learning from aggregated patient-reported outcomes: a mixed-methods systematic literature review.从聚合的患者报告结局中学习以改善医疗轨迹的质量:一项混合方法系统文献回顾。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Aug 17;20(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00893-4.
7
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.
8
Patient-reported outcome measures in oncology: a qualitative study of the healthcare professional's perspective.肿瘤患者报告结局测量:医护人员视角的定性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Sep;29(9):5253-5261. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06052-9. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
9
Are adequate PROMs used as outcomes in randomized controlled trials? an analysis of 54 trials.是否充分使用了 PROMs 作为随机对照试验的结局指标?对 54 项试验的分析。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2021 May;31(5):972-981. doi: 10.1111/sms.13896. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
10
Exploring what is important to patients with regards to quality of life after experiencing a lower limb reconstructive procedure: a qualitative evidence synthesis.探讨经历下肢重建手术后患者对生活质量的重要关注点:一项定性证据综合研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 May 31;19(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01795-9.

本文引用的文献

1
The Role of Philosophical Tools in Nursing Research.哲学工具在护理研究中的作用。
Clin Nurs Res. 2024 Sep;33(7):581-588. doi: 10.1177/10547738241267159. Epub 2024 Jul 27.
2
How qualitative methods advance the study of causation in psychotherapy research.定性方法如何促进心理治疗研究中的因果关系研究。
Psychother Res. 2023 Nov;33(8):1019-1030. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2023.2181112. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
3
Data Mining of Free-Text Responses: An Innovative Approach to Analyzing Patient Perspectives on Treatment for Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps in a Phase IIa Proof-of-Concept Study for Dupilumab.
自由文本回复的数据挖掘:在度普利尤单抗IIa期概念验证研究中分析患者对鼻息肉慢性鼻窦炎治疗观点的创新方法。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Nov 19;15:2577-2586. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S320242. eCollection 2021.
4
How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others.现象学如何帮助我们从他人的经验中学习。
Perspect Med Educ. 2019 Apr;8(2):90-97. doi: 10.1007/s40037-019-0509-2.
5
But Is It Phenomenology?但这是现象学吗?
Qual Health Res. 2017 May;27(6):775-779. doi: 10.1177/1049732317699570. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
6
Nurse-patient communication within the context of non-sedated mechanical ventilation: A hermeneutic-phenomenological study.非镇静机械通气背景下的护患沟通:诠释现象学研究。
Nurs Crit Care. 2018 Mar;23(2):88-94. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12297. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
7
A novel clinical framework: The use of dispositions in clinical practice. A person centred approach.一种新颖的临床框架:临床实践中处置的运用。一种以患者为中心的方法。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Oct;23(5):1062-1070. doi: 10.1111/jep.12713. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
8
Choosing a Qualitative Research Approach.选择一种定性研究方法。
J Grad Med Educ. 2015 Dec;7(4):669-70. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00414.1.
9
Interpretative phenomenological analysis as a useful methodology for research on the lived experience of pain.诠释现象学分析作为研究疼痛体验的一种有用方法。
Br J Pain. 2015 Feb;9(1):41-2. doi: 10.1177/2049463714541642.
10
Applying the Bradford Hill criteria in the 21st century: how data integration has changed causal inference in molecular epidemiology.21世纪应用布拉德福德·希尔标准:数据整合如何改变分子流行病学中的因果推断
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2015 Sep 30;12:14. doi: 10.1186/s12982-015-0037-4. eCollection 2015.