• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结合多源遥感数据与机器学习优化模型估算叶面积指数

Estimation of leaf area index by combining multi-source remote sensing data and machine learning optimization model.

作者信息

Qin Zhen, Yang Huanfen, Shu Qingtai, Yu Jinge, Yang Zhengdao, Ma Xu, Duan Dandan

机构信息

College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.

School of Ecology and Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Front Plant Sci. 2025 Jan 15;15:1505414. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1505414. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpls.2024.1505414
PMID:39881727
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11775760/
Abstract

The Leaf Area Index (LAI) is an essential parameter that affects the exchange of energy and materials between the vegetative canopy and the surrounding environment. Estimating LAI using machine learning models with remote sensing data has become a prevalent method for large-scale LAI estimation. However, existing machine learning models have exhibited various flaws, hindering the accurate estimation of LAI. Thus, a new method for large-scale estimation of LAI was proposed, which integrates ICESat-2/ATLAS, and Sentinel-1/-2 data, and refines machine learning models through the application of Bayesian Optimization (BO), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Genetic Algorithms (GA), and Simulated Annealing (SA). First, spatial interpolation was performed using the Sequential Gaussian Conditional Simulation (SGCS) method. Then, multi-source remote sensing data were leveraged to optimize feature variables through the Pearson correlation coefficient approach. Subsequently, optimization algorithms were applied to Random Forest Regression (RFR), Gradient Boosting Regression Tree (GBRT), and Support Vector Machine Regression (SVR) models, leading to efficient large-scale LAI estimation. The results showed that the BO-GBRT model achieved high accuracy in LAI estimation, with a coefficient of determination ( ) of 0.922, a root mean square error () of 0.263, a mean absolute error () of 0.187, and an overall estimation accuracy ( ) of 92.38%. Compared to existing machine learning methods, the proposed approach demonstrated superior performance. This method holds significant potential for large-scale forest LAI inversion and can facilitate further research on other forest structure parameters.

摘要

叶面积指数(LAI)是影响植被冠层与周围环境之间能量和物质交换的重要参数。利用机器学习模型结合遥感数据估算LAI已成为大规模LAI估算的常用方法。然而,现有的机器学习模型存在各种缺陷,阻碍了LAI的准确估算。因此,提出了一种大规模估算LAI的新方法,该方法整合了ICESat-2/ATLAS和哨兵-1/-2数据,并通过应用贝叶斯优化(BO)、粒子群优化(PSO)、遗传算法(GA)和模拟退火(SA)对机器学习模型进行优化。首先,使用顺序高斯条件模拟(SGCS)方法进行空间插值。然后,利用多源遥感数据通过皮尔逊相关系数法优化特征变量。随后,将优化算法应用于随机森林回归(RFR)、梯度提升回归树(GBRT)和支持向量机回归(SVR)模型,实现了高效的大规模LAI估算。结果表明,BO-GBRT模型在LAI估算中取得了高精度,决定系数( )为0.922,均方根误差( )为0.263,平均绝对误差( )为0.187,总体估算精度( )为92.38%。与现有的机器学习方法相比,该方法表现出优越的性能。该方法在大规模森林LAI反演方面具有巨大潜力,可为其他森林结构参数的进一步研究提供便利。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/5f1292678bff/fpls-15-1505414-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/a8da675918fd/fpls-15-1505414-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/12fc71f53740/fpls-15-1505414-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/c582289aad75/fpls-15-1505414-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/d7c1219c61d3/fpls-15-1505414-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/08b13423b66c/fpls-15-1505414-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/5d8511af5741/fpls-15-1505414-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/89d2316970e6/fpls-15-1505414-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/cc8be62b3a20/fpls-15-1505414-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/71d2b340b53c/fpls-15-1505414-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/38d7db7a18b1/fpls-15-1505414-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/ca7045eba28d/fpls-15-1505414-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/090a5d823eef/fpls-15-1505414-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/83ec82ab8352/fpls-15-1505414-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/6a2129fec75e/fpls-15-1505414-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/21436853abc7/fpls-15-1505414-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/db87de20ba32/fpls-15-1505414-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/5f1292678bff/fpls-15-1505414-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/a8da675918fd/fpls-15-1505414-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/12fc71f53740/fpls-15-1505414-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/c582289aad75/fpls-15-1505414-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/d7c1219c61d3/fpls-15-1505414-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/08b13423b66c/fpls-15-1505414-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/5d8511af5741/fpls-15-1505414-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/89d2316970e6/fpls-15-1505414-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/cc8be62b3a20/fpls-15-1505414-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/71d2b340b53c/fpls-15-1505414-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/38d7db7a18b1/fpls-15-1505414-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/ca7045eba28d/fpls-15-1505414-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/090a5d823eef/fpls-15-1505414-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/83ec82ab8352/fpls-15-1505414-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/6a2129fec75e/fpls-15-1505414-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/21436853abc7/fpls-15-1505414-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/db87de20ba32/fpls-15-1505414-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/11775760/5f1292678bff/fpls-15-1505414-g017.jpg

相似文献

1
Estimation of leaf area index by combining multi-source remote sensing data and machine learning optimization model.结合多源遥感数据与机器学习优化模型估算叶面积指数
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Jan 15;15:1505414. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1505414. eCollection 2024.
2
Estimation of forest canopy closure in northwest Yunnan based on multi-source remote sensing data colla-boration.基于多源遥感数据融合的滇西北森林冠层闭合度估算。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2023 Jul;34(7):1806-1816. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202307.021.
3
Combining spectral and texture feature of UAV image with plant height to improve LAI estimation of winter wheat at jointing stage.结合无人机图像的光谱和纹理特征与株高以改进拔节期冬小麦叶面积指数的估算
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Jan 3;14:1272049. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1272049. eCollection 2023.
4
LAI estimation based on physical model combining airborne LiDAR waveform and Sentinel-2 imagery.基于结合机载激光雷达波形和哨兵2号影像的物理模型的叶面积指数估计
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Sep 29;14:1237988. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1237988. eCollection 2023.
5
The fusion of vegetation indices increases the accuracy of cotton leaf area prediction.植被指数的融合提高了棉花叶面积预测的准确性。
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Jul 4;15:1357193. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1357193. eCollection 2024.
6
Hyperspectral Monitoring of Powdery Mildew Disease Severity in Wheat Based on Machine Learning.基于机器学习的小麦白粉病严重程度的高光谱监测
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Mar 21;13:828454. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.828454. eCollection 2022.
7
Winter Oilseed Rape LAI Inversion via Multi-Source UAV Fusion: A Three-Dimensional Texture and Machine Learning Approach.基于多源无人机融合的冬油菜叶面积指数反演:一种三维纹理与机器学习方法
Plants (Basel). 2025 Apr 19;14(8):1245. doi: 10.3390/plants14081245.
8
Estimating leaf area index using unmanned aerial vehicle data: shallow vs. deep machine learning algorithms.利用无人机数据估算叶面积指数:浅层机器学习算法与深度学习算法的比较。
Plant Physiol. 2021 Nov 3;187(3):1551-1576. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab322.
9
Remote sensing estimation of aboveground biomass of different forest types in Xinjiang based on machine learning.基于机器学习的新疆不同森林类型地上生物量遥感估算
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 20;15(1):6187. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90906-3.
10
Inversion model of soil salinity in alfalfa covered farmland based on sensitive variable selection and machine learning algorithms.基于敏感变量选择和机器学习算法的苜蓿农田土壤盐渍化反演模型。
PeerJ. 2024 Sep 26;12:e18186. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18186. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimation of forest canopy closure in northwest Yunnan based on multi-source remote sensing data colla-boration.基于多源遥感数据融合的滇西北森林冠层闭合度估算。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2023 Jul;34(7):1806-1816. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202307.021.
2
Geometry- and Accuracy-Preserving Random Forest Proximities.几何与精度保持随机森林近邻关系
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2023 Sep;45(9):10947-10959. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2023.3263774. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
3
Ocean warming alters the distributional range, migratory timing, and spatial protections of an apex predator, the tiger shark (Galeocerdo cuvier).
海洋变暖改变了顶级掠食者——虎鲨(Galeocerdo cuvier)的分布范围、洄游时间和空间保护。
Glob Chang Biol. 2022 Mar;28(6):1990-2005. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16045. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
4
Deep forest.深山老林。
Natl Sci Rev. 2019 Jan;6(1):74-86. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwy108. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
5
Estimating the vegetation canopy height using micro-pulse photon-counting LiDAR data.利用微脉冲光子计数激光雷达数据估算植被冠层高度。
Opt Express. 2018 May 14;26(10):A520-A540. doi: 10.1364/OE.26.00A520.
6
An exploration of spatial human health risk assessment of soil toxic metals under different land uses using sequential indicator simulation.利用序贯指示模拟法对不同土地利用方式下土壤有毒金属的空间人体健康风险评估进行探索。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2016 Jul;129:199-209. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.03.029. Epub 2016 Apr 2.
7
Ecology. Biodiversity and climate change.生态学。生物多样性与气候变化。
Science. 2009 Nov 6;326(5954):806-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1178838.
8
Implications of differing input data sources and approaches upon forest carbon stock estimation.不同输入数据源和方法对森林碳储量估计的影响。
Environ Monit Assess. 2010 Jul;166(1-4):543-61. doi: 10.1007/s10661-009-1022-6. Epub 2009 Jun 11.