Molano-Franco Daniel, Masclans Enviz Joan Ramon, Viruez-Soto Antonio, Gomez Mario, Rojas Harvey, Beltran Edgar, Nieto Victor, Aliaga-Raduan Fernanda, Iturri Pablo, Arias-Reyes Christian, Soliz Jorge
High Altitude Intensive Care Medicine International Group (GIMIA), La Paz, Bolivia.
High Altitude Intensive Care Medicine International Group (GIMIA), Lima, Peru.
Front Physiol. 2025 Jan 15;15:1520650. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1520650. eCollection 2024.
In high-altitude cities located above 2,500 m, hospitals face a concerning mortality rate of over 50% among intensive care unit (ICU) patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This elevated mortality rate is largely due to the absence of altitude-specific medical protocols that consider the unique physiological adaptations of high-altitude residents to hypoxic conditions. This study addresses this critical gap by analyzing demographic, clinical, sex-specific, and preclinical data from ICUs in Bogotá, Colombia (2,650 m) and El Alto, Bolivia (4,150 m).
A cohort of seventy ARDS patients, aged 18 and older, was evaluated within 24 h of ICU admission. Data collected included demographic information (age, sex), clinical characteristics (primary pathology, weight, height), vital signs, respiratory variables, cardiorespiratory parameters, blood count results, inflammatory markers, severity assessment scores, and comorbidities. Advanced statistical analyses, such as multivariate logistic regression and principal component analysis, were utilized to identify key clinical predictors of ARDS-related mortality.
Our findings indicate that in high-altitude ICUs, monitoring inflammatory markers may be more beneficial for improving ARDS survival rates than emphasizing respiratory failure markers. Unexpectedly, we found no significant differences in clinical outcomes between altitudes of 2,650 and 4,150 m or between male and female patients.
The study concludes that, in high-altitude settings, ARDS patient survival in ICUs is more closely associated with managing inflammatory responses than with focusing solely on respiratory parameters. Further large-scale studies are recommended to validate the impact of inflammatory marker monitoring on survival outcomes in high-altitude ICUs.
在海拔2500米以上的高原城市,医院面临着急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)重症监护病房(ICU)患者超过50%的死亡率,令人担忧。这种死亡率升高主要是因为缺乏考虑高原居民对低氧条件独特生理适应的特定海拔医疗方案。本研究通过分析来自哥伦比亚波哥大(海拔2650米)和玻利维亚埃尔阿尔托(海拔4150米)ICU的人口统计学、临床、性别特异性和临床前数据,填补了这一关键空白。
对70名18岁及以上的ARDS患者在入住ICU后24小时内进行评估。收集的数据包括人口统计学信息(年龄、性别)、临床特征(主要病理、体重、身高)、生命体征、呼吸变量、心肺参数、血细胞计数结果、炎症标志物、严重程度评估评分和合并症。采用多因素逻辑回归和主成分分析等高级统计分析方法,确定ARDS相关死亡率的关键临床预测因素。
我们的研究结果表明,在高原ICU中,监测炎症标志物可能比强调呼吸衰竭标志物对提高ARDS生存率更有益。出乎意料的是,我们发现海拔2650米和4150米之间以及男性和女性患者之间的临床结果没有显著差异。
该研究得出结论,在高原环境中,ICU中ARDS患者的生存与控制炎症反应的关系比仅关注呼吸参数更为密切。建议进一步开展大规模研究,以验证炎症标志物监测对高原ICU生存结果的影响。