Suppr超能文献

基于生命周期评估方法的煤电发电水影响分析:马来西亚的一个案例研究

Water impact analysis due to coal-electricity generation using the life cycle assessment method: a case study in Malaysia.

作者信息

Mardi Nurul Hani, Ean Lee Woen, Malek Marlinda Abdul, Chua Kok Hua, Ahmed Ali Najah

机构信息

Institute of Energy Infrastructure (IEI), Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Kajang, Selangor 43000, Malaysia E-mail:

Institute of Energy Infrastructure (IEI), Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Kajang, Selangor 43000, Malaysia.

出版信息

Water Sci Technol. 2025 Jan;91(2):219-234. doi: 10.2166/wst.2024.402. Epub 2024 Dec 20.

Abstract

Coal power plants adversely impact air pollution, but they also pose a risk to our water sources. Discharge wastewater from power plants may degrade the quality of nearby water bodies. This study evaluates the potential water-related environmental impacts of electricity generation at an ultra-supercritical coal power plant in Malaysia using the life cycle assessment method. The inventory data were gathered from a Malaysian power plant, and supporting data were taken from the relevant literature. Utilizing the ReCiPe 2016 impact assessment method, this study analyses the mid-point impact categories of freshwater eutrophication (FEP), marine eutrophication (MEP), freshwater ecotoxicity (FETP), and marine ecotoxicity (METP). The results indicate that METP is the leading risk, with an average impact of 1.94 × 10 kg 1,4-DCB per kWh electricity generated, followed by FETP (1.40 × 10 kg 1,4-DCB), FEP (4.66 × 10 kg P eq), and MEP (2.95 × 10 kg N eq). About 95% of the mid-point impact is due to the extraction and processing of hard coal. These findings underscore a critical aspect of environmental management at the supply chain level. Furthermore, mitigating direct emissions from power generation could reduce the mid-point impact, as demonstrated by comparisons with previous research.

摘要

燃煤发电厂对空气污染有不利影响,但它们也对我们的水源构成风险。发电厂排放的废水可能会降低附近水体的质量。本研究采用生命周期评估方法,评估了马来西亚一座超超临界燃煤发电厂发电可能产生的与水相关的环境影响。清单数据来自马来西亚的一家发电厂,辅助数据取自相关文献。利用ReCiPe 2016影响评估方法,本研究分析了淡水富营养化(FEP)、海洋富营养化(MEP)、淡水生态毒性(FETP)和海洋生态毒性(METP)的中点影响类别。结果表明,METP是主要风险,每发一度电的平均影响为1.94×10千克1,4-二氯苯,其次是FETP(1.40×10千克1,4-二氯苯)、FEP(4.66×10千克磷当量)和MEP(2.95×10千克氮当量)。约95%的中点影响是由于硬煤的开采和加工造成的。这些发现突出了供应链层面环境管理的一个关键方面。此外,与先前的研究相比表明,减少发电的直接排放可以降低中点影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验