Shin Jee Won, Scheitler Kristen M, Sharaf Basel, Mandybur Ian, Hussein Sara, Klassen Bryan T, Gregg Nick, Grewal Sanjeet S, Miller Kai J, Shin Hojin, Chang Jin-Woo, Oh Yoonbae, Vansickle David, Lee Kendall H
Medical Scientist Training Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester , Minnesota , USA.
Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester , Minnesota , USA.
Oper Neurosurg. 2024 Nov 18;29(1):93-101. doi: 10.1227/ons.0000000000001427.
A typical workflow for deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery consists of head frame placement, followed by stereotactic computed tomography (CT) or MRI before surgical implantation of the hardware. At some institutions, this workflow is prolonged when the imaging scanner is located far away from the operating room, thereby increasing workflow times by the addition of transport times. Recently, the intraoperative O-arm has been shown to provide accurate image fusion with preoperative CT or MR imaging, suggesting the possibility of obtaining an intraoperative localization scan and postoperative confirmation. In this article, we aim to evaluate the compatibility of the stereotactic frame system with the intraoperative O-arm system regarding lead accuracy and surgical flow.
A total of 17 patients undergoing DBS surgery for movement disorders were evaluated. One patient underwent both the stereotactic CT and O-arm localization, while 16 patients underwent only intraoperative O-arm localization. Following lead placement, intraoperative O-arm imaging was obtained to evaluate the accuracy of the lead placement. Accuracy was defined as the error measured as the distance from the center of the planned trajectory to the cannula.
Less than 0.1 mm difference was found between the O-arm imaging technique and CT image localization of the NaviNetics stereotactic head frame in DBS surgery. Of the 16 patients who underwent the intraoperative O-arm imaging alone, the targets included bilateral ventral intermediate nucleus (16 leads), bilateral globus pallidus internus (4 leads), and subthalamic nucleus (12 leads). The mean ± SD radial error in the probe's eye view was 0.71 ± 0.33 mm for n = 32 leads. No tract hemorrhage was observed.
Intraoperative O-arm imaging can be used safely and effectively for stereotactic registration and lead placement confirmation with the stereotactic system in both awake and asleep DBS surgery.
脑深部电刺激(DBS)手术的典型工作流程包括安装头架,然后在硬件手术植入前进行立体定向计算机断层扫描(CT)或磁共振成像(MRI)。在一些机构,当成像扫描仪距离手术室较远时,这个工作流程会延长,从而因增加转运时间而延长工作流程时间。最近,术中O型臂已被证明能与术前CT或MR成像提供准确的图像融合,这表明有可能获得术中定位扫描和术后确认。在本文中,我们旨在评估立体定向框架系统与术中O型臂系统在电极准确性和手术流程方面的兼容性。
共评估了17例因运动障碍接受DBS手术的患者。1例患者同时接受了立体定向CT和O型臂定位,而16例患者仅接受了术中O型臂定位。电极植入后,获取术中O型臂成像以评估电极植入的准确性。准确性定义为从计划轨迹中心到套管的距离所测量的误差。
在DBS手术中,O型臂成像技术与NaviNetics立体定向头架的CT图像定位之间的差异小于0.1毫米。在仅接受术中O型臂成像的16例患者中,靶点包括双侧腹中间核(16根电极)、双侧苍白球内侧核(4根电极)和丘脑底核(12根电极)。对于n = 32根电极,探头视角下的平均±标准差径向误差为0.71±0.33毫米。未观察到道内出血。
术中O型臂成像可安全有效地用于清醒和睡眠状态下DBS手术的立体定向配准和电极植入确认,与立体定向系统配合使用。